A Human is completely human only when s/he plays

A Human is completely human only when s/he plays

”Our repressed desires are the desires we had, unrepressed, in childhood; and they are sexual desires…The axiom on which Freud constructed…his basic hypothesis is that the pattern of normal adult sexuality is not a natural (biological) necessity but a cultural phenomenon.”

Properly understood, Freud’s doctrine of infantile sexuality is a scientific formulation and reaffirmation of the fact that children seek pleasure. In childhood innocence, as displayed in their delight with their body, remains wo/man’s indestructible unconscious goal.

Children on one hand pursue pleasure and on the other hand are active in that pursuit. A child’s pleasure is in the active pursuit of the life of the human body. What then are we adults to learn from the pursuits of childhood? The answer is that children play.

“Play is the essential character of activity governed by the pleasure-principle rather than the reality-principle. Play is ‘purposeless yet in some sense meaningful’…play is the erotic mode of activity. Play is that activity which, in the delight of life, unites man with the objects of his love, as is indeed evident from the role of play in normal adult genital activity…the ultimate essence of our being is erotic and demands activity according to the pleasure-principle.”

As a religious ideal childhood innocence has resisted assimilation into rational-theological tradition. Although there is a biblical statement that says something to the effect that unless you become children you cannot go to heaven, this admonition has affected primarily only mystics. However, poets have grasped this meaning in its philosophic-rational terms.

In his “Letters on the Aesthetic Education of Man” Schiller says that “Man only plays when in the full meaning of the word he is a man, and he is only completely a man when he plays.” Sartre says “As soon as a man apprehends himself as free and wishes to use his freedom…then his activity is play.”

H. H. Brinton, modern American archaeologist, considers the essence of man is purposeful activity generated by desire. The perfect goal generated activity is play. Play expresses life in its fullest. Play as an end, as a goal, means that life itself has intrinsic value. Adam and Eve succumbed when their play became serious business.

Jacob Boehme, a German Christian mystic, concluded that wo/man’s perfection and bliss resided not in religion but in joyful play.

John Maynard Keynes noted modern economist, takes the premise that modern technology will solve wo/man’s need to work and thereby lead to a general “nervous breakdown”. He thinks we already experience a manifestation of this syndrome when we observe the unfortunate wives of wealthy men who have lost meaning in this driving and ambitious world of economic progress. He says “There is no country and no people who can look forward to the age of leisure and abundance without dread.”

From the Keynesian point of view it will be a difficult task to transfer our ambitions from acquiring wealth to that of playing. But for Freud this change is not as difficult because beneath the habits of work acquired by all wo/men lay an immortal instinct for play.

Huizinga, a noted anthropologist, testifies to the presence of a nonfunctional element of play in all of the basic categories of our sapient cultural activity—religion, art, law, economics, etc. He further concludes that advanced civilization has disguised this element of play and thereby dehumanized culture.

The author, Norman Brown, concludes that psychoanalysis have added to these expressed statements regarding the importance of “The play element in culture provides a prima facie justification for the psychoanalytic doctrine of sublimation, which views ‘higher’ cultural activities as substitutes for infantile pleasures.”

Quotes from “Life against Death” by Norman Brown

Exactly, and this is the scientific basis, on which modern researchers/scientists/educated laypeople, can deny freuds nonsense claims. Because theres massive evidence that normal adult sexuality is a product of natural biological adaptations.

In all societies men/women look for CERTAIN traits in females, these traits ALSO correspond to things like how fit the woman is to have a child (for example a certain waist/hip ratio (or within a certain framework) is lusted for in all human groups (or almost all) its also found, that this hip/waist ratio, corresponds to levels of certain essential fatty acids vital for infant development. Symmetry.

For females, they often-times look for traits that correspond to high levels of testosterone (certain facial appearances) and many many others (that i don’t feel like getting into)

anyway the point is that in all cultures everywhere, this ‘evolved’ sexuality is VERY apparent, in mate-choice tactics in both sexes, in all groups.

We can point where other areas of sexuality, like incest-avoidance is totally against freud’s theories, but Westermack knew that before freud anyway, and made predictions (that unvieled new information we were ignorant about) which shows that people set up incest-avoidance mechanisms by judging cues in co-habitation with family.

As some hilarious evolutionary psychologists point out, Freud’s theories about sexuality probably had more to do with the fact that he wasn’t raised with his mother/siblings, the way 99.9% of people are, and probably developed an attraction for them, based on this adaptation never getting the chance to set up in Freud.

hilarious.

Coberst:

Anyone who observes little children will see their sense of wonder and trust, towards the world and their parents, their willingness to almost immediately let go of the silly “small stuff, and they tend to live “in the moment”. I think that Christ was pointing to these qualities as ways in which to get into Heaven.

These are the same qualities, I believe, that when we “naturally” experience them (except for the “parent” part), we are able to be forgettable of our “ego” and free to be playful, to sense that natural wonder in the world around us, to stand “in the moment” and to be free to trust people thereby revealing ourselves as we are, in our playfulness, in whatever form that takes.

I think it can only be when we sense that kind of personal freedom that we are able to “become like a little child” and be playful/play. I think we all must have at some time or another sensed that kind of “freedom” rising up in us (it is unstoppable) when we were then able to just throw caution to the wind and show ourselves in all of our playfullness without worrying about feeling silly or any of those other negative feelings that get in the way. It is both cathartic and energizing at the same time.

I think this is probably what Joseph Campbell meant when he spoke about “following your bliss”. That kind of joyful play can be anything from sexual play to reading a book of philosophy, running, dancing, rolling around on the ground with someone, any kind of passion that causes joy to rise up inside of you. Have you ever observed the passion with which children play.

Strange…I don’t remember Jesus walking around in the Bible doing silly things himself? :-k

Oh, that’s right! He didn’t have to because he was ALREADY a God! :confused:

Pandora

Don’t you remember that time that you and I were following Christ for such a long time and we were so tired on our feet. Well, we finally got to sit down and that’s when His apostles brought him the loaves and fishes and He decided to multiply them because we were all so hungry. Do you remember how good that bread and fish was to us – being that we were so so hungry? Now wasn’t that a silly thing for Christ to do… to multiply those loaves and fishes for the crowd. Only having fun – trying to put us into that time… :banana-dance: :banana-dance: :banana-dance:

Anyway, seriously, your statement was – if Christ was ALREADY a God (he didn’t have to walk around doing silly things – okay, again, so if He really was/is the Son of God – and we are told He was also “fully” human, then why couldn’t He do very silly things – being that he was as much human as He was Divine. As for myself, I do many very silly, silly things – isn’t that part of being human?