A message of Purpose

Exactly, that is what WW III Angry usually does.

Yes. WW III Angry is the one who has a very vage theory. So we are allowed to expect him to give evidence or a justification of his very vage theory, if it is possible, but he does not or merely in a very vage way again. That does not surprise me. But moreover, instead of evidence or a justification he mostly gives accusations (for example: “you haven’t …” [see also above] … and so on) or moral imperatives (for example: “you should …”, “you should not …”, “you need …” [see also above], “you have to …”, “you must …”, “don’t say …” [see also above] … and so on). That is so ridiculous.

Why are you so cucksure? Try to be full of doubt.