A “moral person” should be considered to be: a moral relativistic asshole
An “ethical person” should be considered to be: somebody who’s not a hypocrite and stands by their word
A “moral person” should be considered to be: a moral relativistic asshole
An “ethical person” should be considered to be: somebody who’s not a hypocrite and stands by their word
By who’s moral and ethical standards?
Whoever claims to be “moral” or "ethical of course!
Don’t ethics sort of stem from moral principles?
Ok then we will go by my morals and ethics so i would have to disagree. My standards relieve of such egotism.
Don’t ethics sort of stem from moral principles?
Yeah, I’ve never understood the difference either.
Morals work off good and evil, and ethics work off good and bad. I think. Maybe ethics is more about consistenty.
Ok then we will go by my morals and ethics so i would have to disagree. My standards relieve of such egotism.
If you disagree, then you disagree. Though, I am still right!
Morals work off good and evil, and ethics work off good and bad. I think. Maybe ethics is more about consistenty.
I think that this is accurate. Ethics is more about principles based on ‘consistency’ regardless of whether those principles are ‘good or evil’.
I read this book when I was in 9th grade called “the ethics of an immoralist”. Not too bad really.
I read this book when I was in 9th grade called “the ethics of an immoralist”. Not too bad really.
I can tell.
Was it about you…?
Nope. It was about that transparent poetic queer Nietzsche. I’d recommend it to a 9th grader.
Kriswest:Ok then we will go by my morals and ethics so i would have to disagree. My standards relieve of such egotism.
If you disagree, then you disagree. Though, I am still right!
Thats fine, you go over to the right and I will be the one that is correct :-"