Hi Doc,
Agreed. The dilemma is in making the judgement in what it is we ‘know’ in contrast to that which we know only vaguely. If you couple that to a processual universe where even our knowing is conditional, it get’s to be interesting. I gathered from some of his later writing that ultimately, our knowing is always from a particular perspective, and even that vantage point is in constant evolution. If there is any importance to his ideas, any relevance, it is the understanding that the ‘static’ mechanistic view of the universe cannot be sustained.
JT