I have just finished an essay by this title and thought I’d post it here for those who may be interested. Then I figure we could hold a discussion on it in this thread if you like.
dtstrainphilosophy.blogspot.com/ … dhist.html
Thanks 
Daniel
It’s possible for “souls” to enter into new bodies…
But reincarnation is partially a myth.
IMO:
SACM:
Bias effecting the results from any test–shows that a state of human belief and being alters reality. Let’s talk about how that happens. [Remember that more then humans are doing this to reality!]
Our world opinion, our values and our state of being–are a way that the entirety reacts to the world. When matter and energy interact with one another, they “remember” each other.
Example: Light reflects off of matter; enters they eyes; reacts with the living system; living system reacts; reaction is projected into the world by whatever means at all possible by the living system. Just think about it. Don’t all life forms on earth want to eat matter and energy if they can, and then give birth to/build more of their own works, will and species? Well, they want to do that in every way. They want to make the entire universe exactly how they want it to be.
When a sentient being interacts with the neutral matter or energy–then it retains some sentient attributes. The bahavior of matter can be slightly reprogrammed—sub-atomically. All atoms have subatomic structure, and structure is information. Information can be understood, decoded and recoded. By means of energy intent/reflections & reactions, our ZD and physical energy output “programs” the quantu around us, and it especially programs the quantu that we focus upon. Our belief alters the quantu. Because of our entire universe consisting of a reverse-engineerable structure, hardly anything is impossible. [Recent works on earth include building of atomic structures, molecule by molecule; if that’s not reverse engineering the structure of reality, then what is!?] Strange beings exist, even though science cannot yet proove that they exist or how they work, but just as the bias of a scientist alters the structure of his local reality, so does the independent programmed quantu exist. Billions of dead souls, superstitions, desires, emotions, thoughts, spells and firm beliefs have fed a vast amount of programming into the earthly quanu. This mass of diverse programming, I will call it the “sub-atmopanic code mass” (SACM). Spells mostly consist of Sub-Atomic Code (SAC). The extent in which the quantu can be programmed–is limited. The extent in which a being can program the quantu–is also limited.
Within the SACM, there are ghosts, angels, demons, everything! In some way or another, though it’s hard to really take it literally–these things sort of exist… They don’t “really” exist, in an absolute sense, but they do partially exist, and they do partially live/act/effect reality, and even the partial effect can be very powerful [depending on the SAC].
Not only is the mind a reprogrammable machine, but also is the entire universe–a reprogrammable machine.
It’s too complicated to figure out were all of these SAC creatures came from, or how, but it’s of great benefit for us–to simply acknowledge their existence and form a reasonable theory on how they exist.
Dan~,
Your response has nothing to do with the subject matter of my original post. It is clear that you haven’t read the article, or that you are ignoring it. In either case, your post would be better as a thread of its own, and has the potential to completely derail this one.
But please do start a new thread with those concepts, because I would like to see how they play out in discussion with others - just not here.
I would therefore hope and ask others not to reply to Dan~'s concepts in this thread.
Thanks
Wouldn’t what I said apply to reincarnation?
I’ve read other things also.
Karma reincarnation orders were listed off by Indian(?) religious peoples in a very similar order compared to evolution. This was done many hundreds of years before the theory of evolution was written. The idea was that maybe these spiritually “enlightened” people were consciously becoming aware of the history of their own DNA, and it was a sort of “passed life”.
I will now read your blogz some.
I feel like **** 2day n I don’t care hwo InA propriate my repliez R.
I suppose it would apply to reincarnation, but my essay is not about reincarnation. I would appreciate this thread be more about the article referenced in its first post, meaning about the concepts involved in a Naturalistic approach to karma and rebirth (not reincarnation).
But, as I mentioned, yours are interesting ideas deserving of their own thread.
Sincerely,
Daniel