Necessary for the creation of the universe is a first existent in the pre-universe. There are three possible first existents in the pre-universe: immaterial space, a powerful being and others of an immaterial nature. A powerful being can never be eliminated unless all that exists is the material and that will be determined later in this post. Other existents in the pre-universe can be introduced by human imagination. There are sound reasons for the selection of immaterial space as the first existent. The connection between immaterial space in the pre-universe and immaterial space in the current universe is obvious. The material could not create itself; therefore, the immaterial created the material and immaterial space is ideal for a material universe. There can only be one immaterial which eliminated a powerful immaterial being. In considering the creation of a universe, it is easy to arrive at the view that a universe can only be one of matter and space. Quantum Mechanics’ particles, waves and fields significance is weakened by the assertion that matter is fundamental regardless of its composition because its composition was created by the first existent, immaterial space in the pre-universe.
A “powerful being” never existed in the first place in order to be eliminated. That is your imagination making stuff up to fill your voids of knowledge. The human brain “makes stuff up” to fill in the gaps. It’s why eyewitness testimony is almost worthless.
Why assume matter is what is being created instead of space that is being created? Suppose that infinite 3 dimensional distance was filled with infinitely dense matter by default, and that empty space was being created. Then it is empty space that is being created by infinitely dense matter deteriorating and creating empty space. So it is voids of mass, otherwise known as “empty space” that is being created over time. It is deteriorating because that’s what mass does over time, it evolves to space.
Thanks for your post. I welcome all views, but I just don’t believe that space is being created since I believe that it has already been created.
What happens if now there is a bucket of water outside, and tomorrow when you look at the bucket there is no water in the bucket? There was no “empty space” in the bucket yesterday because it was filled with water, but today it is “empty space.” The water mass evolved to space over time.
What if today the sun was a massive object in space, but 1 trillion years from now it was all burned up? Mass evolved to space.
What if today the universe existed, but in the future it was gone? As usual, mass evolved to space.
If our universe was the only game in town then all that would be left when it was gone is an infinite empty space.
So long ago there was mass and in the future there will be no mass, because nothing lasts forever. Nothing was ever created it is everything evolving to space. In other words it is not something evolving from nothing, it is nothing evolving from something.
I don’t believe that the universe will ever end. My principles: from nothing comes nothing and no entity can create itself. What always existed, in my view, is immaterial space. In the pre-universe, there is no time and neither is there ontological time–only conceptual time.
What do you think ontology the ISNESS is?
What does “pre” mean?
pre means before
actual created existence; being basic in the beginning
So you believe some things last forever. If that is the case then there is no end, so what makes you think there was a beginning?
There are 4 possibilities:
- The universe had a beginning and it will have an end.
- The universe had a beginning and it will have no end.
- The universe had no beginning and it will have an end.
- The universe had no beginning and it will have no end.
So you believe 2 and 4 are possible and have eliminated 1 and 3.
How did you determine to eliminate 1 and 3?
What makes you believe in 2 and 4?
On 1, space is immaterial, so there is no end.
on 3, in pre-universe, there was no beginning because there was no universe, then
with the creation of the universe, there was a beginning.
On mass, the universe should not have an energy death because if it grows cold, the big crunch
should ensue followed the explosion of the big crunch. This is what I think, but who knows?
The universe will always exist because NOTHING does not exist. Since nothing does not exist, there will always be something, no energy, crunch or whatever.
Reality is something of a virtual mass of material existing in and out of our of the meta verse. Prime-Earth is that which in this dimension of here and now co-exists with this universe. Multi-verses exist outside of this virtual material world we perceive and is living along side other universes alike in said meta-verses. So to live in this Prime universe is as if your co-existing in the multi-verse’s meta-verse (universe). Prime-Earth exists now in what our dimension is perceiving as reality in a dead land no longer inhabiting humans and where all life is already dead. Now because we exist outside the realm of death we contradict ourselves as perceives by our own senses and live in a universe of so much life it’s teeming with it. So as there is no existence in Prime-Earth where we already inhabited millions of years ago and are now on the age of discontinuity we find ourselves already existing in every perceivable way imaginable and still don’t recognize how life with all it’s paradoxical anomalies dispersed into a void-less mass. Well that’s clearly a blunder all it’s own and we only know so much.
So before we forget how use science maybe we re-use our mathematics and do the math ourselves. The beginning has always been and with no end in sight we only see the end as a means to start over what is already conclusive.
Death can’t exist without life having first existed you see?
Death was an infant of what life offered. One truly trying to feel free can only be perceived so much outside the box we’re apart of and can only deduce so much before the accompanying truth that all existence is death and death is existence just outside of the time we’re apparently use to.