You caught pretty much the whole pattern, including the epistemic asymmetry - you gotta prove stuff a hellava lot more than he does in discussions with him.
Some responses and quotes that confirm what you’ve noticed:
I asked him: Are you infallible when it comes to knowing what is True and Real?
Anew1: Yes, and this is just because of the formula I have and the process I use.
My bold on the Yes.
Some other quotes that may shed light on what he is doing:
While discovering these I also came across a formula that, to me, shows what will lead us all into living in peace and harmony together.
I may be a very simple person but seeing and understanding all of ‘life’s’ so called problems, and answers is really rather easy. I can see and understand why every person is the way they are and why they do the things they do.
As long as we are open, and thus not believing nor disbelieving (in) anything, then we are being truly intelligent enough to learn more and absolutely anything, including how easy it really is for all of us to being living in true peace and harmony together.
He claims to neither believe nor disbelieve anything.
All of you here are in a cult, but since none of you even recognise which cult that is, you do not even realise that you are in a cult.
You believing that you are not in a cult means that you don’t even recognise which cult you are in. This justifies my assertion. That you don’t even notice that you are in a cult, also justifies my assertion.
One of the hardest things, I think, for human beings to do is show that what is right when others do not and will not believe (in) them.