Religion (or lack thereof): New Confucian
Years spent studying philosophy: I’ve always thought about it, but I’d say that over the past 6 years it has been more about refining a position as opposed to building a base.
Favorite philosopher(s) to read: Tu Weiming, Bryan Van Norden, Zhu Xi, Mencius, Confucius, Xiong Shili, Rodger Ames, David Hall.
Philosophers you’ve adopted philosophies from: See above, plus: Wang Yangming, Luo Qinshun, Michael Sandel, Foucault, MacIntyre, Aristotle, Whitehead, Kirkegaard, Marx, Wang Fuzhi, Hume, Yi Yulgok, Putnam, and probably a bunch of others.
Philosophers you’ve adopted absolutely nothing from, but still enjoy reading (this may overlap with #3): “Nothing” is pretty strong, but “very little” or "learned through antagonism would be: Nietzsche, Zhuangzi, Thoreau, Sartre, Han Fei Zi, and probably a bunch but none come to mind.
Philosophers you hate to read/philosophers whose philosophies you hate: Again, hate is a strong word. But I’ll go with: Derrida and post-modernism in general.
Philosophers who you’d hang out with, just for fun - not to necessarily learn from (living or non-living): The Yan Xishan blog puts up a good case for Xunzi, and I can’t say I disagree with his logic. Van Norden seems like he is a bit of a dork, but I could hang with him no problem. Pretty much every regular poster on ILP.
Philosophical texts you love: I really like the Lun yu and the Mencius. I get something out of every reading. “Humanity and Self-Cultivation” by Tu Weiming is nice too. Wing-tsit Chan’s “A Source Book of Chinese Philosophy” is also pretty hard to argue with, for the sheer volume of information it contains.
Three words that describe you: Impulsive, fusion (as in cuisine, but with philosophy), unfocused.
One WORD of advice to aspiring philosophers/thinkers: Secondary-sources
Philosophy or oranges?: depends on the variety.