Let’s remove all God concept from this discussion. This has nothing to do with God whatsoever.
For the sake of discussion:
Given, the observable universe was born out of singularity(?) Chaos churns and life is brought forth(?) Abiogenesis is the accepted theoretical mechanism(?) Chemical reactions alone are enough to account for life(?) Thus, no God, God’s, god, or gawds needed.
The paradox I present to the Atheist is this:
Even if, against all probability, against all mathematical odds, that chemical reactions randomly assembled into a codified structure capable of communicating a physical form into existence, even if that were so, has not the Universe somehow spoken? A code of life has been written. All speaking is accomplished with code, and all codes say something.
Let’s assume that one does not accept the genetic code as a genuine code. Instead, let’s assume it is a pseudo-code, or a template, or blueprint. Very well.
We’ll assume (for the sake of discussion) that this pseudo-code has pseudo-authored biological living beings into existence. But many of these beings are indeed capable of authoring new code beyond their innate genetic structure. The Wolf Howl, the Whale Song, The Figure 8 Bee Waggle, The Gettysburg Address…
Shall we deny any of these as being genuine codes as set forth by Claude Shannon protocols of Information Theory?
If we cannot deny this, then we must accept that the very words you see upon this OP are ultimately the Voice of the Cosmos. We must conclude that these scribbles on your monitor are ultimately Star Speak.
Does this not provide unwitting support for ancient myth and folklore of talking trees, whispering streams, and burning bushes that give instructions to birth a violent nation? If IT truly is as hard Marxist Dialectic Materialism would have us believe, then that belief begs us to accept the very mysticism that it would otherwise deny. Is the Atheist a parody of the Religious fanatic they would otherwise mock?
In Kindness.