[b]Simon Critchley
I have argued that philosophy doesn’t begin in wonder or in the fact that things are, it begins in a realization that things are not what they might be. It begins with a sense of a lack, of something missing, and that provokes a series of questions. [/b]
He means serious philosophy of course.
It is so ridiculous to limit oneself to one version of the truth.
Unless of course there actually is only one.
Just to say “Well, God is dead” in one breath is to say, in another, that nothing means anything. This is the moment of nihilism. Nihilism is the affirmation of meaninglessness.
Essentially as it were.
For me philosophy begins with these experiences of disappointment: a disappointment at the level of what I would think of as “meaning,” namely that, given that there is no God, what is the meaning of life? And, given that we live in an unjust world, how are we to bring about justice?
Wow, he thought, does that take me back.
I’ve always been very keen on Pascal, and what I’m most keen on in Pascal is his emphasis upon human wretchedness. He has a phrase which goes something like ‘Anxiety, boredom and inconstancy, that is the human condition’ and I’ve always been very partial to that.
In other words, “very little, almost nothing”.
It’s complicated. On the one hand we’re killer apes, and on the other hand we have this metaphysical longing.
Simplify that, Mr. Objectivist.