Nor does yours, as we’ve previously discussed (1,2).
But my argument is about the principles driving the pro-choice position, and in that sense it reflects the current reality. Your argument on that point seems to be that the pro-choice position is motivated by the love of death or something, and that does not reflect the current reality.
If you kill the body it doesn’t have the right to speech and assembly either, but that’s not what we’re talking about.
You oppose abortion because you think fetuses are persons and that killing a person is wrong. Others support abortion because they think women should get to decide what happens to their own bodies. Those are claims about different rights.