Abrahamism

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

The Demolition of Dingo, Part 2
Christians are Divisive Ones
Christians adopted the Jewish Worldview on Idols
Pagans were tolerant of the gods of others. Christians were not
Christians were handed a mission by Jews to serve their political agenda, that poses as a Spirituality

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

Abrahamism is the source of this psychological dis-ease.
Fermenting for centuries.

Abrahamism is the original Woke.

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

[MagsJ (Surya Loka.. triumvirate)]

@Lorikeet

Fake news…

[Sleyor_Wellhuxwell]

@Lorikeet

EMJ is back in the News…
“Suppose Some African goes to Poland, can he become a Pole if he learns the Language, THE ANSWER IS YES, that is exactly what could happen”
Catholicism to the Rescue of the White Race
Christianity denies Heredity, Genetics & Race

The source of this nihilism that produced Americanism, and postmodernism is Abrahamism.

It separates genes from memes, and uses memes, i.e., culture, to usurp or negate genealogy.

They let it do, because they do not do it themselves. Christianity has to do it for them and does it for them. They continue to do what they want.

They simply do everything they forbid us to do, for example: they use hate speech, conspiracy theories, racism, sexism, xenophobia, fascism/national-socialism, anti-Semitism (because Arabs are also Semites, even more than 90% of all Semites) etc. etc. etc…

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

Yes…nihilism is defensive…and it can be manipulated to produce a desired outcome.
Nihilism is entirely semiotic, making it the perfect tool/weapon, to subjugate thinking.

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

In Lampert’s book How Philosophy Became Socratic concerning the origins of modern western roots in Socratic (Platonic) thought he writes:

@Lampert

Language necessarily misleads, collecting particulars that are always parts of processes into classes of relative fixity named by words of varying generality that human propensity reifies into something like the ideas. Platonism as a doctrine pictures – and takes advantage of – the human propensity to ‘platonize,’ to treat as real the ‘ideas’ that are an indispensable part of understanding and communicating. Platonism as a doctrine reifies basic experiences of the beautiful, just, and good, the opinions that arrange the world morally; it lends the world moral foundation while inviting the philosophically inclined to investigate it.
Because the doctrine of the ideas is true to the human propensity to generate seeming permanence, it is untrue to what Plato reports about Socrates’ singular experience; his turn to study human experience lingered momentarily over the ideas as the solution to a philosophical problem but led him eventually to discover the desire-generated character of the beautiful and the good. Platonism as a doctrine does what human experience generally does: sever those desire-generated products from the activity that produced them. Platonism mirrors in theory the natural human propensity to detach the product from the process, occluding and denying its product-character.
Platonism as a doctrine gives this natural propensity to ‘platonize’ the gift of a theory plus arguments and images to secure it against doubts; it gives Glaucon a ‘philosophy’ of the sort to which he naturally inclines, a safe one that secures the beautiful, just, and good against doubts raised by philosophizing.
[How Philosophy became Socratic]

A wonderful exposition as to how Platonism merged with Judaism to form Christianity. Here we read, using different wording, how the propensity of a human mind, or any mind, to simplify & generalize, is exploited by Plato as a means of establishing core transcendental ideals.
Monotheism is introduced to Socrates, and through him to Plato, by a certain Thracian, named Zalmoxis.

@Wikipedia

Zalmoxis {Greek Ζάλμοξις, also known as Salmoxis, Σάλμοξις, Zamolxis, Ζάμολξις, or Samolxis, Σάμολξις} is a divinity of the Getæ, mentioned by Herodotus in his Histories IV, 93-96. In later interpretations, which begin with Jordanes (6th century AC) and have proliferated during the 19th and 20th century, mainly in Romania, he was regarded as the sole god of the Getæ (not to be confounded in this context with the Thracians or their relatives, the Dacians) or as a legendary social and religious reformer of the Getæ people to which he would have taught, following Herodotus, the belief in immortality, so that they considered dying merely as going to Zalmoxis. Herodotus states that Zalmoxis was also called by some of the Getæ Gebeleizis, which made some searchers conclude that Getæ were actually henotheists or even polytheists. Another discussion exists about the chthonic, infernal, or uranian, heavenly, character of Zalmoxis.

Socrates now turns out to be nothing but a social idol, a precursor to the coming monistic dogmas, and a pagan version of Jesus – one of his “prophets,” sacrificing himself for the good of the city, after he has offered them salvation in the form of a ‘noble lie’; a Satanic Promethean trickster that pays the ultimate price for his rule-breaking, i.e., his worm-tongue, his forked tongue.
Plato, at some point – playing the role of Philosopher King – realizes that too many accessible options are detrimental to a city’s stability. The unrefined minds of the brash and the vulgar must be offered an unforgiving, authoritarian, singularity, or else they will pull the social system apart with their unfocused passions. This, along with his ideals, is one of the pieces of Hellenism that would eventually be incorporated, along with Judaism, into a new unity that would be called ‘Christianity.’

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

Rabbi shocks the world !
Didn’t shock me.

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

Christianity…

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

The delusion that everything must be created from nothing, including morality, is an Abrahamic superstition.
The idea that everything can evolve from within existence, is incomprehensible to them…or unsatisfactory.
They need a creator…if not god then man must be the creator, because then it is correctable.

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

THE LIFE OF JESUS CRITICALLY EXAMINED BY DAVID FRIEDRICH STRAUSS PART 1

THE LIFE OF JESUS CRITICALLY EXAMINED BY DAVID FRIEDRICH STRAUSS PART 2

THE LIFE OF JESUS CRITICALLY EXAMINED BY DAVID FRIEDRICH STRAUSS PART 3

THE LIFE OF JESUS CRITICALLY EXAMINED BY DAVID FRIEDRICH STRAUSS PART 4

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

OMG Must Watch:
“Gentiles are Jealous of Us”
“We Think we are the Chosen People, Which btw we are”
“We are Elitist, We are the Chosen People”
“Only the J-wish People are the Children of God”
“The Nations of the World are not the Children of God”

Why would anyone feel anything but love towards these “innocent people”?
Why would they be expelled over 110 times?

Why?
Don’t understand.
It must be because we are envious.
It’s not them…it’s us.

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

Don’t Let Andrew Meyer Confuse You with his Kabbalistic Terms
Chabad: "Everything in this world into either Sitra D’Kedushah (the side of holiness) or Sitra Achra (the side of impurity)—literally meaning “the other side,” or the side of Kelipah
Light (Jews) vs Dark (Gentiles)

[Sleyor_Wellhuxwell]

@Lorikeet

Yes…nihilism is defensive…and it can be manipulated to produce a desired outcome.
Nihilism is entirely semiotic, making it the perfect tool/weapon, to subjugate thinking.

Are you thinking of something like Kabbalah?

[Lorikeet (Satyr)]

Kabbalah is an appropriation and corruption of Gnosticism.
They’ve done this with every idea they’ve come across - being expelled from host after host for centuries.

But nihilism can and has multiple variants, precisely because it need not abide by existing phenomena…but contradict them in seductive ways.

[Sleyor_Wellhuxwell]

@Lorikeet

The delusion that everything must be created from nothing, including morality, is an Abrahamic superstition.
The idea that everything can evolve from within existence, is incomprehensible to them…or unsatisfactory.
They need a creator…if not god then man must be the creator, because then it is correctable.

Correctable, yes, because if it is correctable, then it is criticizable, and if it is criticizable, then it is capitalizable, and if it is capitalizable, then it can lead to power over the world.