Absolute proof of reincarmatio/eternal return

Here’s absolute proof that you can turn lead into gold…

It (al)wa(y)s already …

pluripotent

transdifferentiation

Complete creativity. Finished work in progress.

What at first appears as a gap… is only meant to draw attention… so you’ll remember it in its fullness.

Someone beyond all that sees no gap in the first place. Just beauty before it’s born. Beauty he has always known.

No, not by any means.

Cut out could as well mean out of the back-grounded enclosure. That’s part of the paradoxical.

Cut.

:

Insight in way to redemption/enlightenment

Thought about immortality today in Siamese temple and suddenly 'saw’IT.

Kerouac came to mind in / through ‘dharma bums’ as when trudging up big Sur mountain when he too seized by the feeling/thought that made him express: This is the Golden Eternity we live in.

The limits of endurance that the Crucifiction presented, made Him realize so many things namely the need to separate levels of reality from the original atjnopromorphic image of unity, into it’s many firmed aspects.

Why?

Because without such process , eternal time would manifest an existential impossibility, that would block the analgam(analog) of realizing IT’s particular existentially bound beings.

The negatives of shade necessarily pains the WORD, the biblical representation-Gutenberg rightly introduced IT) as the beginning of that challenge.

The current Pope is having a tough time convincing holdouts with residual stubbornness to relinquish the Latin Mass.

So the living immortality that every second of existence reflects, carries the price of pain, a kind of separation anxiety which precedes the original birth angst, the premonitive for shadow of the search for the light, out of the cave.

Look: at colors wittgenstein’s exposition: colors bleed into each other, as if meaningful reflexions( look back) can be stopped at a certain level of cognition. But there need a will to do so, a will to desire to delimit the intuit (and above) , within brackets of sensibility

If intuition be thought of a sensible, or another sense through which phenomena can manifest: then there is a de-differentiaton between the levels above and below 'consciousness. (And the ‘blending of colors’ reduce to all or nothing, black[ total lack ] &/or white [ total presence] .

dark greys gravitate toward literally understood emergence, according to pleasurable developmental progressions , ( based on undifferentiated abstracted preordinate imagery, (with darker , blue-green energy spread ; -while lighter grey’s gravitate upwards toward colors that are in the yellow-orange-red energy spread.

The reversibility of the two color spreads, along the grey core, is due to the relative counterposition of acquisition of phenomenon. ( as if, the thinker can displace himself within the opposing sequence of the spread. )

The nominal subjectivism of a majority of sensibility, can be formed under an authoritarian central will’s power-supression , for instance.

Cut gut

Identity power plays of willing the course from or away toward the sense of certainty or that of redundancy can be changed merely by destabilizing the former,.

It started long time ago with the cynics, …but their beyond the scope of reflection (to the original -( image) always lagged a few spotty steps behind intuition -hypothesis.

The mixing of colors that can be reduced to the equivalent of the dynamic converter into a kind of pantoscopic central modem/modulator, to create a simulated equivalent mixes.

I just wanted to say that I have read your post. :slight_smile: I’m going to let it blend flavors.

islamicity.org/6015/quantum … ter-death/

Will this blend ?

islamicity.org/6015/quantum … ter-death/

That article makes a lot of claims without evidence. Trash.

However, it did link to this, which is cool:
esa.int/Science_Exploration … background

Also - if the part on microtubules and quantum computing using brain matter is real - I need names.

OK .Big bear. It’s a lot to ask of Creation , for man to get to the point , this point. above reason, lefting things fall say.

Simply another animal but imprinted by myrIad others’ of every shade of impression, of persuasion so loaded with stuff, that snowballed, from that point in space , pregnant with all other points that had still some dimension inward and out , and each not fixed but zigzagging , meeting, colliding constantly. They firm a very large hive at times as bees stick unto one another.

Thy become aware of each other at first through their singular orbits, channeling into the beams all around like spectral prismatic lights razors into a singular phase" a sheath cutting singularly and arriving to some other sudden always to rest there for another moment of eternity.

There are no possible spaces between the points because expansive instant fill-ins, the can change size and breath to the tune of zillionth of powers up and down the scale.

Here that there hearing her from perching on a new burn starred new shoot of a deep greened foikaged branch a blackbird one still?

Saw one wise owl do that so noticed carried of the soul one time years ago after my son passed like a falling, during midsummer’s night, one,
Never seen one before of after, but it stayed there unmoving for days on end, only moving it’s head around, then left as sudden as it came.

The sheets of the prismatic slices as with the music down, briefly atoning fir the charged e this of HIS unanswerable presence.
Without Which the absence could be of no account

Last day on Big Bear

That’s why we need all three (reason, purpose, understanding) and should abandon none of them, but most importantly should put our hope (purpose, passion, joy) in the eternal that is true, lest we be deceived, and are most to be pitied, like sandcastles for the tide.

Yes , sure, but standing under reason and purpose is like that of passing under the incline formed if a leaning ladder against the wall, archaically bad luck, versus standing over it, and being closer to the firm of the junction.

Vis: con troll- iing it from above at least appears less fraught with danger.

Course6 playin’ the advilcate of the negative here, as it must be to prove point.

this song… Charles Manson stole from the Beatles… and we’re stealin it back.

youtu.be/cLdvK7KuMcc

From Manson yes and he ’ stole’ it from the stolen back promise of mr. Melcher record producer’s promise to comes through to record Hanson’s very unique and original song.

Then he nixed that offer unkindly setting up the dangerous events to come which he may or should have seen.

That is an unbalanced assessment that sounds like you align yourself with Manson.

That is where the blade cuts both ways. Even if it’s a single blade rotated around imperceptibly .

because if I said those things, I would feel like I was trying to justify his behavior

Do you think a perfect God has less right to hold Manson accountable for his actions in the end, than Manson has to (order) murder unjustifiably—regardless whether foreseeable?

God has to give us a chance, down to rock bottom, or all love is impossible. Only he can know when it is right/wrong to intercept. Who are we to say the perfectly good God screwed it up?

There is no way to justify Manson’s actions.

removed for just cause

removed what?

i counter-remove just because