I will post mirrors when these links are taken down. The liberal-left need Censorship to defend themselves, violating the 1st Amendment of the United States Bill of Rights:
that guy is getting the shit sued out of him right now and david hogg is going to start a pillow company with william legate and put him out of business lol u cant make this shit up
Most of this is stuff I’ve heard, but others might not have. They have recorded data of Dominion switching votes. They did an internet datalog on incoming and outgoing data transmissions, showing foreign interference in the election.
Honestly the Arizona data-analyst back-engineering the voting algorithm is still by-far the most obvious and damning proof of the widespread voting fraud.
Furthermore, the recent celebration article posted by the Times basically lays it out how the Far-Left organized to steal the overall election.
The Times article is especially damning; they basically openly admit to their methods and who was/is responsible.
I’ve posted those in another thread yesterday. This Times release is a huge blunder, almost as bad as the False Flag Capitol riot.
Yes, I saw that. They couched it in “they/we did it to save the USA from Mr Trump” in order to ingratiate themselves as much as possible (lying and fraud are ok if it is for a good cause - almost the definition of the Ugly Swamp in America).
But I am wondering what pushed them into having to state it.
You guys legit have no ability to determine what constitutes evidence and how it is distinguished from heresay, speculation, and conspiracy theories and if I’m being honest, it is fascinating to observe.
A counting machine that says there were 123.1 votes cast for O’Biden is a mathematical impossibility - Yet it was found to have happened (or a similar number).
K: if there was proof, you would think the 60 plus court cases would have found that…
you guys lost 60 cases in court… and there was no evidence of any kind brought forward…
you evidence is so weak and flimsy, that a court won’t look at it…
K: if there was proof, you would think the 60 plus court cases would have found that…
you guys lost 60 cases in court… and there was no evidence of any kind brought forward…
you evidence is so weak and flimsy, that a court won’t look at it…
O: That shows who it is that can’t recognize mathematical impossibilities.
[/quote]
K: and many, many of those judges were IQ45 appointees and so, I am not surprised…
but the more interesting thing is that you are depending on Mathematical impossibilities
instead of the law or any evidence… I note that “mathematical” bee’s can’t fly
and that it is “mathematical impossible” for life to have started…
and it is quite often billions to one odds that someone wins the lottery and yet,
it happens… to base your argument upon “mathematical impossibilities”
shows us how weak your argument really is…
we can use math for all kinds of things…including mischief…as you are using it…
K: ahhh, thus making the real argument here… that because you hold X beliefs, that you
are in some manner “superior” to us mere mortals…
you in fact hold to the “ubermensch” theory… in which because you hold certain
beliefs, that you are high above or superior to every other human being unless
they hold the exact same beliefs… you feel that the “sheep” are below you
and you are the “superman” high in the mountains…you may has well
call the rest of us" “Sheeple” for that is what you mean…
but the reality is, you are no different then we are… we mere mortals…
your beliefs don’t make you superior… I know, because I was,
long before you were born, I considered myself superior to everyone
because I held certain beliefs…I was a follower of Nietzsche at the time…
and I was “sure” I too was an “Ubermensch”… I found out, later, I’m not…
and granted it was a surprise to me, but reality has a way of bringing one
back to well, reality…our beliefs are a product of our age, our place,
our family, our state, our religion and the media… we are indoctrinated
into certain beliefs…just as you have been indoctrinated into certain beliefs…
and which you still hold… the difference between us is that I know what
beliefs were an indoctrinations and which beliefs that I actually do hold…
whereas you have no idea what your real beliefs are and what has been
indoctrinated into you…
so that is where to start… see if you, by some means of a reevaluation of values,
discover which values you hold are actually yours and which values you hold
are those pesky indoctrinations from your childhood…
you are basically on autopilot until you free yourself from your indoctrinations…
until you uncover what is truly and uniquely your beliefs…
and until you free yourself from your indoctrinations, you aren’t much
more then a robot just repeating what you have been told…