^^^ I dont know about that time cube stuff, but I do know there is an equally pressing question that we as a society must eventually address… and that’s whether or not black wives matter.
Now implicit in the premise that black lives matter is that a black wife matters because she is black and has a life. We deduce this directly from the premises. Black lives matter, this wife is black, therefore her life matters.
So the prez has a neice who’s about to explain in a book how he became such a worthless piece of shit. This might almost be interesting if it involves stories about family intrigues and stuff. Something about him falling under the influence of the grandfather who was worthless piece of shit #1 I guess.
So would it be cheesy to rename a song long after you made it? But here’s the thing… here’s why it might be cheesy. It’s a very complex matter I need to explain. When I made ‘moonlight kind’ with the beat maker go app, I used the sound set because it had keyboard options that produced steely dan sounding piano chords. That was the first thing that led me to fuck around with it and record that little couple minutes. Just a melody and a simple bridge that I should have made shorter but I was messing with the sound effects of the chimes and wolves and stuff.
HOWEVER, I did not manually create the chords… they were already steely dan sounding. Hence, our dilemma; can I say so much that simply because I FOUND something already steely danish (ew imagine eating a steely danish), I am licensed and justified to literally rename a song because of a current infatuation with their music and the happenstance memory of a track I made with an app?
It would be like pretending to do something on purpose post hoc, and that’s cheesy as fuck. On the other hand, while indeed I did not toil over a piano to produce those sounds, I still had in mind that particular Rhodes sounding electric piano and/or organ sound set when I choose to buy it.
We stand at the precipice of a very difficult decision. Can I now say… incidentally and perhaps only because of my current obsession with the band(s), that I meant to name it the fagen kind rather than what it was previously called?
Maybe you don’t understand the paltry abhorrence of having to face yourself before a question like this. The overwhelming gravity of its gratuitous grandiosity.
You prolly think I got a thesaurus open right now.
No but you can’t just say "just change the name dude. Jesus.’ Its not that simple.
And dont pay any attention to that gay ass picture on the couch. I should delete that gay ass picture on the couch pic, actually. Thw blue shirt one is good, you know sporty, sociable and extroverted or whatever.
Lol I’m imagining that flat look on the faces of anybody who listened to that dutch fusion band Crypto I posted couple days back. Then the analogy came to me, something I’d use in defense of fusion over simpler forms of music, any day.
Think of graphic art and what makes it good. Not the content - landscape, object, animal person, abstract, etc - , but the form. It is the complexity of many different ordered effects that give any content the possibility of being represented in an elaborate way. If the form is simple, the content can’t be well developed. In that two dimensional space on the paper you can produce through difficult texturing, shading, scaling and proportioning… or, you could just draw a stick figure. It would be of the same thing, but it wouldn’t be as good as the one with all the intricate nuance and organization going on between elements.
Same thing goes for a song. The same complexity of form is what gives tonal objects a space to be organized… and the more something is organized the greater its parts, you could say. Same kind of texturing and shading and scaling and proportioning is happening but not in visual terms. Okay. The stick figure is to the professional portrait what the power chord is to the bar chord. Same thing, but not as rich. The full range of the object content is not brought to bear in the simplicity of the power chord as opposed to the fretted four fingered bar chord.
Thats prolly a weak analogy but you get what I’m saying. Just because the perception of the complexity of more sophisticated music (classical & jazz, e.g.) isn’t available to the listener - I call them emotional listeners - it doesn’t follow that there is not a perceivable space in which these incredibly complex structures exist. You just caint hear it, and you moralize against it… call it pretentious… all because you can’t tap your foot in time to a 6/8. Omg I can’t enjoy it. Blah blah. There’s no feeling. It’s just technical excess.
Imma tell you what a musician is just like uncle frank told me. A composer is someone who manipulates air molecules to do his bidding. Now just as the graphic artist is limited precisely to his ability to create a space of expression, so is the musician.
Know what those idiots are doing at the art museums staring motionless at paintings for 45 minutes? Watching fusion. The others walking by can’t see it.
Oh shit here we go. Round two; American special forces drop into Mongolia alpha tango niner foxtrot boots on the ground in seven seconds, and plant bubonic plague on herdsman jacket in retaliation to conspiracy theory that China designed covid19 to liquidate all western whitey assets.
I’m now imagining a dystopian Orwellian nightmare future in which there is a new class of citizen based on immunity levels. All kinds of new diseases floating around and vaccinations aren’t free. If you’re wealthy enough to get the season three antibody upgrade, or STAU as we call it, you’ll live another year.
Dude that’s a great idea for a scifi novel. Prolly been done already though.
Wait I just found out it wasn’t an actual team that delivered the package but a RGFCCF (remotely guided flight capable cybernetic flea) that was dropped by a drone over Mongolia.
If you have seen Birx give a briefing without wearing a scarf, raise your hand.
S’what I thought.
And whatshername, the second shift CNN anchor, just told Tucker the fuck off.
Bitch ass talking about homegirl with no legs dont love her country. That chick was shot out of a fucking Apache helicopter or some shit, bro. Not only risking life and limb for her country, but quite literally giving them away. What’s tucker done to love his country? Put a little american flag on his desk or something. Fuck outta here.
A goddamn combat transport chopper man. That’s some straight GI Jane shit.
Imagine how bad she must feel everytime ‘she’s got legs’ by ZZ Top comes on the radio.
Jeremy Diamond always has the sharpest suits, duddint he? Kid’s going places.
He’s no Kaitlin Collins though. Kait could give you a comprehensive walk through the entire Gettysburg address in less than 60 seconds if she had to. She’s the primo stuff in reporting.
Squeeze him, Kait. Lemme tell ya something. It is not only entirely impractical and unnecessary to build a border wall out of steel, but more difficult to built and far more expensive (even if it costs peanuts compared to the trade deal that took priority). Dumbass goes on and on about a ‘stronger’ wall… as if the Mexicans crossing the border are driving fuckin tanks or something. What an asshat. Has the nerve to insinuate that Kait knows nothing about the construction industry and then says some dumb shit like that.
The best way to do that wall is to pour concrete into casts and reinforce/brace the american side with vertical supports. Done. Pedro ain’t climbing it, aint driving through it, and it’ll stand for hundreds of years.
Of the caucasian races, the English brand are the biggest idiots. You can tell this by comparing the positions of the U.S., the UK, and other predominantly white countries on this order of ranking: worldometers.info/coronavirus/
Course i understand there are variables involved but I’m guessing that if Sweden or Germany or some other reasonably lower country on the list was the size of the U.S. or as condensed as the UK, their numbers still wouldnt be as high.
Conclusion: the industrial revolution made the English speaking white people careless and arrogant.
Finally somebody said it right.
“Marxists, who are skeptical of right-wing populist conspiracy theories, also accuse the global power elite of not having the best interests of all at heart, and many intergovernmental organizations of suffering from a democratic deficit, but they argue that the superclass are plutocrats only interested in brazenly imposing a neoliberal or neoconservative new world order—the implementation of global capitalism through economic and military coercion to protect the interests of transnational corporations—which systematically undermines the possibility of a socialist one-world government.[94] Arguing that the world is in the middle of a transition from the American Empire to the rule of a global ruling class that has emerged from within the American Empire, they point out that right-wing populist conspiracy theorists, blinded by their anti-communism, fail to see is that what they demonize as the “New World Order” is, ironically, the highest stage of the very capitalist economic system they defend.[94]”
There needn’t be a deep state if capitalism openly conspires as it does. That’s the grand irony. Deep state conspiracies are distractions to draw attention away from the open conspiracy of capitalism. Lol check this guy out. From the criticism section of the wiki article on conspiracy. The principle here basically is that conspiracy theories are very difficult to manage even on relatively smaller scales… not to mention any collaborative efforts by secret deepstaters who are trying to create a world government.
"The physicist David Robert Grimes estimated the time it would take for a conspiracy to be exposed based on the number of people involved.[88][89] His calculations used data from the PRISM surveillance program, the Tuskegee syphilis experiment, and the FBI forensic scandal. Grimes estimated that:
a Moon landing hoax would require the involvement of 411,000 people and would be exposed within 3.68 years;climate-change fraud would require 405,000 people and would be exposed within 3.70 years;a vaccination conspiracy would require a minimum of 22,000 people (without drug companies) and would be exposed within at least 3.15 years and at most 34.78 years depending on the number involved;a conspiracy to suppress a cure for cancer would require 714,000 people and would be exposed within 3.17 years."
Check this out I just realized something. I have never drank a full glass of wine in my entire life. Never. I’ve sipped a few times, but that’s it. I’ont really like the way it feels in my mouf.