Actual Unemployment Analysis regarding Obama

It would seem that the idea that Obama hasn’t been helping the job situation is B.S. or otherwise people not having a general understanding of math and trending and statistics…
Yes it is not an amazing alteration, but it is a reduction of what was likely an uncontrollable result of an anomaly (unless you want to take the conspiracy side and say Bush instituted it intentionally to F with the next President…I don’t think so personally) if someone just miraculous made Jobs appear they would have to be some sort of miracle worker, things take time, and the trend is reducing!

P.S. If you want to think it is BS coming from a Democrat…I’m not a Democrat…I just look at the stats rather than someone’s interpretation of the stats…

Original graph from this place: tradingeconomics.com/united- … yment-rate

American dream? More like a American nightmare.

No wonder we see news skits about 60,000 Americans living in China or immigrating elsewhere.

Was unemployment really at 5% at the beginning of 2008? I don’t remember it being that low. Are there really skits about Americans jumping the border to China? Oh God. What’s the message there? The ultimate nightmare of the US middle class is having something in common with a mexican?

February of 2008, almost 5% on the nose.

ok.gov/oesc_web/documents/lmiuerates2010.pdf

I don’t know anything about any kind of skits.

A lot of the problem with jobs is the entrance of the “highly educated” into the workforce that won’t settle for any of the jobs they can get…part of that is understandable though considering the money put into getting a higher education on the idea that an easy high paying job would result…those desk jobs being taken over by computer programs…

usatoday.com/news/world/2005 … uide_x.htm

In this modern age technology is making us all more and more obsolete. Of course the capitalist favors dead mechanical labor versus a living laboring workforce because it’s very cost effective for them on their part.

With modern technological industrial society large segments of the population become assigned the state of being obsolete in terms of skills entering the labor workforce where their only choice is unemployment if they can get it or working various miserable jobs that require less skills that pays a much lower income. This is why in modernized society that the middle class is being eradicated and why there is the start of only a existence of the very wealthy where on the other side of the spectrum there is the very poor.

Were becoming a dual society where there is the better off educated specialists on one side where there is the uneducated impoverished peasants on the other.

What will inevitably arrive out of this paradigm is a war between the specialists and the nonspecialists because the nonspecialists will soon grow intolerably weary of their slavery.

Will this weariness lead to a second global communist revolution that is version 5.0? A very interesting question that is. Or will it just lead to global anarchy and chaos?

When it concerns social interaction and phenomena everybody forgets about the complex dynamics of technology entering the equation especially when it is controlled by the very people who exist by exploiting large segments of the population.

What the "Big cats’ don’t realize is that continuance of automation will lead to loss of the capacity to accumulate wealth in the long run and will cause their world to come crashing down, maybe their selfish and don’t care about the kids and think they won’t be the ones to suffer…I don’t know that so many think like that which indicates that reduction of that behavior may only need logical evidence of what will come of continuation of their behavior…I think thus that war and or total collapse is avoidable…

Avoidable? Were beyond that now… Inevitable chaos is on our front door step presently. It’s going to be fun world wide baby! =D>

Economical data can be manipulated and has been for some time now.

Time is money, if any institute withholds money for a period of time it has the capacity to put it in Hihg porbability return stocks & bonds, for even the shortest periods of time…
I.E. Debit cards: instant transmition of funds if run as debit, 1-2 days if transmitted as “credit”…nobody seems to know why except speculations of what is going on…like slow transacting due to this or that when that doesn’t make since due to ease of “debit” transaction. The only slight logical explanation I have herd is the possibility that certain laws in place require more checks…but I doubt they would take an addition 1-2 days…and who knows who payed for those laws…

Disagree. But you could be correct…we’ll see. i won’t be fun though if it does happen, fighting will only be 1/3 if such occurs…alot of it will being trying to survive after ability to rely on our technology begins to crumble…

Politics and statistics are the same game, one with words, the other with graphs. Each so easily twisted.

Indeed

Had to re-post the image there, they changed it on me…

Since they already know who is going to win and even if merely specualtion, the actual effect of Obama would have to have started earlier than what that graph displays. In fact, it puts the news of Obama’s probable election right before the unemployment was at its lowest. The tiny bit of improvement after his election is nothing compared to what seemed to have happened merely because of his election.

The fact is that he promised many things that people invested into only to find that he lied.

But paying attention at all to such political stats is ridiculous.

It would only have been a lie in so far as it didn’t come true in the way others thought…ultimately we didn’t get what was expected…but it does seem that he at least reduced the trend, you can’t expect someone to just magically get us out of stuff…most of the time…But I imagine better could deffinitely have been done…although who really knows it is possible he kept us from going into a hole…can’t know that of course…

Mostly your right, you can mostly only see some basic things, like just did spending really go up… and stuff like that…but most predictions are completely impossible to base on any statistical information…only on evidence of policy…