Consider the basic problems of the paradox.One to One correspondence does
not equate to a dimension of length. This proposes an idea of infinity,and more importantly an inconsistency with time and motion,Zeno’s paradox’s.
now lets step forward 2000 years and look at the current state of philosophy and metaphysics.A riddled mess of dualism,that reveals nothing into the nature matter,except for arbitrary definition and long strung out chains of reasoning.It never provides for a way to truly test the system itself, except for definitional comparison.In effect time has remained outside the logic of philosophy
Lets assume that there in fact is not a dualism that there is only matter
now lets assume (you) have a mind.How may your mind ever become aware that it indeed is a mind.(part of matter)
so either a,the mind is outside (you)-the system of matter(proof),or b,you do not have a mind
I am one that believes the first proposition is much more sensible and logical
though we may explore both possibilities
either way monism is false because communication would become impossible, starting from or leading to
Now lets consider a new abstract that I will propose and see if we can find some errors,ideas,or paradox
this my be flipped around if you like and flipped either which way, though I ask
2 questions
what are the consequences of a set of eccentric circles- and Is a mind and or time required to define the set
and does this set equate to a circle with infinite radius,and if so,is it a dependent zero
many more conclusions and metaphysical questions
interested on your hearing your responses first
or at least a defense that you have a mind