A STATEMENT by someone I overheard OF HYPOTHETICAL TRUTH
All arent created equal, but none the less all can be happy.
Happiness reflects inner quality.
Covering of women is a means to level the playing field so that inner quality can rule the transaction.
It is if not democratic at least socialist.
Making love with the lights out.
I do think it applies to males as well.
Happiness in slavery?
Of course. Lets have some examples.
Happiness in being an object of desire or happiness in self discipline… or in defiance or whatever - whatever your values are your happiness is in pursuing them.
Thsi girl imposes a fascist regime on herself…
This girl is fascism.
You’re not convincing me Fixed.
Women are so ingenious
Me neither really Im afraid
They are nice.
Men, as starkly contasted as possible in one conversation
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVvNvuVXAnE[/youtube]
Why is a woman with tits a fascist, and one suffering from cancer not?
I’m never going to get this forums hatred of women, and need to superimpose unrealistic presumptions of what power is for men, on women. Neither sex follows your outlook. A woman with a great ass isn’t remotely like Adolf Hitler, and women aren’t as dominated by fashion trends as we like to think… it matters till you give birth, less and less the more secure you are in a relationship. By time their kids reach adulthood, most women don’t give a damn about looking cool or expensive, unless they are protecting a status of privledge (such as the queen, who doesn’t want to turn into a financially humble old woman, in fear cuts to her funds will continue with her successors).
So long as Bimbo Titsowitz isn’t around a insecure girls boyfriend, they are on great terms.
Why?
Or not.
Well Turd I was saying she is fascism. I meant it in a 7 fold irony referring to men who commit heinous acts on account of such womanly excess.
However this thread is one of the most weird ones that was made by my hands.
Listen, the rutting instincts of animals like Rams, Birds, and Dagoes aren’t hominid, we typically don’t fight one another in courtship.
I would never fight another man for some fresh pussy, and if I was with a woman, and a man threatened to fight me for the right to fuck her, and she got face flushed, hot and bothered with nipples.and on high, I would instantly dump the bitch and walk away… if kids are present and between us I’m taking them with me so they don’t got to see that foul mating ritual best reserved for ferrets. How I found and married the ape-woman who desires men to constantly fight for her is beyond me, I expect a more cerebral emphasis from the women I fuck. I want her to have enough defensive skills so as to protect the damn kids, either to hold her ground enough to intimidate or if she can’t, to get them out to safety. I don’t believe in fighting for dominance and showmanship. It is bizarre and rotten.
If fascism is built around getting attractive women, then the one nut wonder Hitler did a terrible job of it. Mussolini not too great either. A lot of those fascist soldiers died on the front lines, far away from home and their women. A lot of not fucking was going around.
During WW2, 2 million German women were raped by the red army. A deeply horrible act… but can you imagine how low the German population would be had they not done so, today?
Combat and mating don’t much mix. Women, especially young ones, do preserve that awareness of when men are fighting, often admit to liking the attention, but that is more a display of vanity that dimwitted personality types indulge in. I really don’t think they are mating material for a man interested in philosophy, desiring good children. A woman should reflect less a desire for sensual enjoyment, or a happy life… though they things would be great, than the ability to pass on intellectual innovation and rugged survival. The flip side if inventiveness is hardship, necessity is the mother of all invention. The ability to survive our mistakes in making a better world is paramount for a civilization building species. Given every great endeavor take risk, every great idea considerable time to contemplate the pros and cons of, how it fits, then these traits matter most.
I’m hardly opposed to the boxum bounty of a curvy body, but unless she has these other traits, she isn’t worthwhile. A woman lacking a long generational vision is a blind one. In our society, most people are blind. It wasn’t always that way.
Why is that ingenious? Every fucking mammal does that.
I think he was trying to say the one with tits thinks of herself as better than everyone else–an elitist.
That isn’t fascism, that is vanity and elitism.
If grandma thinks she is the top sewer at the Quilt Sewing competition in the 80+ category, is she a fascist bitch? If your the top Amish butter churner, are you secretly aspiring to be like hitler? All Amish can think about all day is genocide and world domination?
No, Turd was closer.
I meant to say that men fight over women, and that women act as if this is not the case, while exacerbating the fighting.
I am aware that not all men are prone to fascism.
The whole point was that that girl stays home when the men fight over her to be killed and then she’s there to be impregnated by the stronger army. And as history shows and evolution prescribes, women who take pleasure in that, or at least endure it well, predominate the more privileged layers of the genepool.
I don’t think that is the case, the more “privledged” layers have traditionally married out of political, economic, and territorial necessity.
If I am a princess, be I ugly or beautiful, I’m in high demand in the territories looking for a alliance with my fathers state.
When it isn’t a landed, but economic issue, it is the portfolios of combining the estates.
Of course, a successful man may chuck this all aside and marry whomever he damn well pleases… especially if he feels secure with his neighbors and liked by his people.
Or, he can have a mistress and legitimize his kids out of necessity (his legit kids all die).
These aren’t the guys fighting over women. That is your perpetually drunkards in the lower class beating one another in the bar over the same skank, half the time she is married.
Your reading too much into traditional pulp fiction, we pass it off as culture today, but it was written to be salacious and to be of interest, for profit or for fame. Only a dipshit fights for pussy, if she demands it, drop the bitch on her ass.
This isn’t the same as your wife or girlfriend being attacked, or you being unprovoked attacked to get to her… that is assault and battery with an intent to rape. Evolution, contrary to the SatyrThink on this forum, doesn’t favor this. How do we know this? We lock them up, hang them in many countries to popular applause. Evolution clearly favors society weeding these fucks out. It isn’t that the rapist has power, or society does… neither do, as power doesn’t exist. But there is a dialectic at play, and most psychological pressures the random individuals within a society has, is aimed at stopping this.
If anything, we lean more towards the bonobo in fucking anything that moves, including women. Look at Nietzsche, more or less a constant cuckold. That didn’t evolve through power aggrandizement, but the need of partners in a relationship sticking to it for the sake of it. No fighting necessary involved, no violence necessary. He may still impregnate her latter on, get away with deposits elsewhere, but he is around to take care of the kids, some of which are likeky his offspring too… hence how that psychology evolved in the first place.
In no society I know of, is male cuckolding openly accepted anymore, Marco Polo encountered a few in central asia, necessarry to avoid inbreeding in isolated villages. This is pressured out more than it is encouraged to continue. Men having mistresses was more common, but that is going bye bye too.
There is the lower class Nietzschean countercultures, but to use a biblical expression, that is built on the sands. No solid foundation. Im doubting a multigenerational, family friendly community can emerge around BDSM. Polyamory maybe, but the results look like shit so far outside the pilygamy of the mornons, which was veru short lived, or in Islam, where it is barely existent anymore.
People do all sorts of crazy shit, it seems like so many trends are inevitable, but it is the stable families producing children who can in return produce more stable offspring. The lower and middle classes are losing their children to drugs fast… lots of deaths, a genocide of sorts. The conservative aspevts exists for a reason… it will assert itself more and more as time goes by as they get greater shares of the genepool.
I can be short: Read Homer.