All Identity is: Variable; Form; Process; Everything; Sense; Nothing; is; Assertion; Claim

****All Identity is: Variable; Form; Process; Everything; Sense; Nothing; is; Assertion; Claim

I

  1. There is --A.

  2. There is -A.

  3. What remains as both is A thus all identities are variables.

II

  1. There is a picture of a waterfall.

  2. As a picture of a waterfall the picture is not a waterfall.

  3. The picture, however, is dependent upon an existing waterfall.

  4. As dependent upon the existing waterfall it cannot exist without the waterfall thus is connected to it.

  5. As connected to the waterfall it is the waterfall as connection is equivocation as the form equivocates across degrees.

  6. The picture is both a waterfall and not a waterfall.

  7. What remains is the form as intermediary

III.

  1. One senses that one senses.

  2. Sense becomes self referential and without contrast therefore without form as only sense remains.

  3. Formlessness is unable to be sensed thus one cannot sense that they sense as to sense is for attention be impressed up, this impression requires form.

  4. However we only know of sense through sensing it.

  5. The sense of the senses is the sense of the form of the senses as a recursion.

  6. What remains is process.

IV

  1. Everything is senseless as everything cannot be sensed given it is indistinct as having no contrast, otherwise it would not be everything.

  2. This is sensed.

  3. Everything is sensible.

  4. Sensible means anything considering it is everything, thus is non-sense.

  5. What remains is everything.

V

  1. There are empirical senses.

  2. These empirical senses are sensed by the mind through the abstraction of memory.

  3. The memory becomes empirical as it exists through the actions it directs.

  4. Sense is both abstract and empirical even though abstract/empirical depend upon contrast as opposites.

  5. What remains is sense.

VI

  1. Reality does not exist beyond the senses.

  2. We sense the senses but no-thing exists beyond the senses.

  3. In sensing the senses we know the senses exist.

  4. In sensing the senses “sense” we sense everything as reality does not exist beyond the senses.

  5. The sensing of sense leaves sense as self-referential and without comparison (as only sensibility exists) thus sense is no-thing.

  6. In sensing sense we sense no-thing.

  7. Considering reality does not exist beyond the senses and the sense of “everything as the senses” we are left with reality as no-thing.

  8. Reality does not exist beyond the senses but the senses are nothing; reality does not exist beyond nothing.

  9. What remains is nothing.

VII

  1. Everything is separation.

  2. Everything is connected through the same underlying act of separation.

  3. Unity is the connection of parts.

  4. A part is separation as a part and not a whole.

  5. What remains is “is”.

VIII

  1. “Everything is infinite”.

  2. This is a finite statement.

  3. “Everything is finite.”

  4. This is an infinite statement.

  5. What remains is assertion.

IX

  1. In saying “everything” we summate to a “something”.

  2. In saying “something” we diverge to “everything”.

  3. What remains is claim.

1 Like

@eodnhoj7

Everything is mind or mental projection?

:clown_face:

No.

Distinction.

Mind, no-mind. They operate through distinctions. They are distinctions. Distinction is a transcendental event that is both and neither.

I do not claim a mental or non-mental universe or existence. Mind and no-mind exist, in context, absolute in context, but are not the sole primitive.

1 Like

@eodnhoj7

What is the sole primitive?

How can distinction exist without mind?

Instinct, or unconscious?

:clown_face:

Distinction.

Mind is a distinction.

Instinct and unconsciousness are degrees by which distinctions are made relative to a context: intuition as distinction through feeling, unconsciousness as the containment of all possible distinctions of the mind simultaneously…potential distinctions of the mind with potential distinctions being a distinction.

The mind is subject to being an event of distinction.

1 Like

@eodnhoj7

Is distinction tied to identity?

:clown_face:

2 Likes

Distinction is what allows identity to be and not be.

Their is a indistinct point, it is indistinct because there is no contrast:

The indistinct point self-contrasts, by repetition, where the once indistinct single point is now distinct:

●●

The point as distinct now has an identity in the respect it is definite, the event of distinction is what allows it to have an identity as a point:

●●

Prior there was no identity:

● =

1 Like

@eodnhoj7

This line of thought you’re using to reach these conclusions, what do you call it?

I would like to read more on this.

:clown_face:

Responded in another thread.

1 Like