(this is on my phone. It will be quick)
No, I’m obviously not Christian.
What I propose is for all anarchists to adopt esotericism.
Esotericism means studying the occult. I don’t think we really need to talk about realms or anything. This isn’t really that type of discussion.
All I’m saying, really, is that if your recognize the need for (Masonic) anarchy, then either be a mason or oppose them.
Cause actually participating in the fighting is for the profane.
Morality is a catch all term for certain character traits. An evil person can be more highly intelligent than a kind person and outsmart them or defeat them, but that doesnt make them neccessarily more pure spiritually. It can also manifest as a non-materialistic intent to cause suffering, whereas this type of character trait will express more integrity than a materialistic sociopath. Evil is always a lack of a certain trait observed in an action.
some people just have that lack in character traits, but the intelligence and ruthlessness to apply occult practices effectively. not to mention consummation by the quest for temporal power and wealth at the expense of ultimate demise.
Anarchy is the operation by natural laws and naturalistic human behavior. government is operation by cultural mass delusion and oppression.
you should consider reading the OP in the thread ‘bullshit opinions and morality’ in the hall of questions. I think it corresponds well with your perspective.
Yeah, I wasn’t sure about using the word realm with an occultist… Fine then, spheres, whatever, I think you understand me, it’s not about the designation, it’s about exterior and interior, esoteric and non-esoteric.
Anyway, I think I can dig what your saying, even though I know little about occultism.
But to ask would-be terrorists to turn to advanced psychologic methodism… Maybe you misunderstand what an anarchist is after?
The role is not the friction that leads to a bomb. Maybe some would like the chaos. It’s itself the bomb that demolishes… Well, if you won’t say what, I won’t either. And it’s not the role that is sought, it’s not about the form.
Anyway, the fact that I’m not out there now waiving an AK around (excluding the possibility of me being a coward) shows that I’m not 100% on this. Firstly, it would be more like throwing an ant at a Rhino than anything leading to a bomb with any meaningful weight. Secondly, interesting people seem to be sharply against it, and I want to make sure before I act that anarchism isn’t, as you say, profanity. It seems to me to be a straight-forward issue of realtions of power, but I have allways been an exoteric type and, well, as Sun Tzu might say, If I don’t know the other side of the equation than I only have 50% chance of being right, or whatever percentage the side of the spectrum that I know represents.
So AF, you seeming like an interesting person, what I am driving at is this: what affection do you have for rules, who already defies christianity? Not rules that might be found, that might be rough maps of life, but rules that are given (on the basis of patently… profane? ideas and ideals no less!). You are not a christian, anarchism is simply the rejection of the christian system.
“Anarchist” does not define what you seek, it defines your opinion regarding the current state of the relations of power among humans.
Damn AF, I think I take it all back. I think your metaphor for anarchy before was spot on…
Thats all for now.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu-16Wz347g[/youtube]
By now, “appeal to Nietzsche” is probably a fallacy, but indulge me in watching from roughly 7:20 on.
Thank you, pezer, good film clip. 
I have some more to say on this.
When we drive, we follow rules. The rules are given authority. But, those rules aren’t oppressive or evil. If everyone followed the rules perfectly, it would be better that way.
Now we have beurocracies dedicated to things such as medicine, justice, science, police, etc. Specialists run each of these systems. A big part of modern government requires specialists. But if an office or a specialist fails, everyone suffers. If the police, for example, can’t properly function well, crime increases. Police are supposedto be part of the system of anti crime specialists.
If many specialists fail, we suffer. The national government is the specialist of managing taxes and diplomacy and many things.
It’s possible for a government to be so bad that we are better off without it, but we still need a set of social rules specialists to help guide everything.
The problem i see is more like failure of the species, instead of blaming it all on the government.
We’re not socialists in general. This means the government isn’t responsible for everything that happens.
Anarchists blame everything on authority and the government. That’s not true.
Marxists blame every bad thing on the rich and the upper class. That is also not always true.
Polarity exists in both anarchism and marxism. It’s over polarized and blames everything on one single type of class of people or systems.
We need to be smarter as a species. I think we need to seriously revamp the education system aswel as the mass media.
That i think is the main problem.