Anarchy

Yes he is an internet anarchist

The question of right and wrong is a matter of subjective interpretation, you say.

Would that be positive nihilism? The idea that meaning is not something that is inherent to the universe but something that is created using one’s own mind?

I think you are that guy who said that Satyr is a positive nihilist.

Nietzsche said that masters are “creators of values”. Some people take this statement too literally. They interpret it to mean something it does not really mean and that is that every person who authors his own values, meaning, who does not adopt them from the outside, is a master.

That’s not true. It’s not enough to simply author your own values in order to qualify as a master.

Where do you think Christians got their values from? Certainly not from God. God does not exist. Never did. Somebody had to invent these values before people could adopt them.

Christianity was invented by Christians for Christians. It was authored by themselves for themselves.

According to your positive nihilism, Christianity is an okay system of values so as long people who adopt it do so voluntarily.

The mistake that you’re making is that you’re reducing everything to a very superficial aspect that is volition.

Volition does not matter. What matters is the effect of one’s actions on one’s being.

What Nietzsche really meant when he said that masters are “creators of values” is that masters determine the value of their actions based on the effect they have on their bodies. Whatever strengthens, organizes, the body is good. Whatever weakens, disorganizes, the body is bad.

It is possible, and often the case, that people voluntarily choose to act in the manner that is harmful to their own self.

We call such people self-destructive.

Do you deny the existence of self-destructive behavior? Where minds choose, nay, prefer, to act in the manner that harms their bodies?

Do you think that every action is necessarily self-affirming?

Do you think that whatever you do, you do the best you can do, thus necessarily what is useful to you?

Do you think it’s impossible to act in a self-harmful manner?

Once you accept the existence of the manner of interaction between mind and body that we designate by the name self-destruction – and often also by the name self-disrespect – then you also have to accept that there exist situations in which we can, and we should, speak on the behalf of others and against their will.

Thus, right and wrong is not a simple matter of subjective interpretation.

I do not deny that right and wrong is conditioned by one’s biological constitution. What I am denying is that everyone acts in harmony with their biological constitution.

They don’t.

Not even when they think they do.

Not even when they make decisions on their own.

You need to observe what truly matters and what truly matters is the relation between one’s action and one’s body. Its effect on it.

But you reject Nietzschean concept of self-determination. Instead, you embrace self-determination of positive nihilism.

Your values are not grounded in your body. Instead, they are grounded in its rejection.

Like how transsexuals create their values, by first rejecting their bodies, who they really are, and then creating a plan inside of their heads on how they should live their lives, then figuring out what methods to use in order to suppress, ignore, forget, deny, reject, tyrannize their bodies so that they can at least maintain their belief that their plan will one day be executed, that one day they will become what they want to become, the opposite sex, the sex that they are not.

That would be the Apollonian disease of mind without body, mind rejecting its body treating it like a blank slate, and of the concept of will as some kind of magic pen with which one can define oneself any way one wants.

Um…you’re the guy who blames his misfortunes on daddy government…not me. I’m a criminal. So what you’re saying just simply doesn’t fit. You’re a slave. So maybe you meant to say this about yourself?

Could you just restate what it is that you’re trying to say here?

I am a positive nihilist and an introvert too. I am just passing through so nothing really matters. Only in the here and now but not beyond. I have no power or influence so keep to myself. I am slowing learning to let go. When I do die no one will miss me but it will not bother me either. Being alone gives me physical
and psychological space. I function better when alone so it is what I choose. Time is running out for me but I am not bothered. I simply accept it and let it be

Doesn’t seem positive to me.

Maybe not but how others perceive it is academic so their opinion does not matter
It is however entirely realistic and that is more important as far as I am concerned

How do you know

I do not know for certain but even if I am wrong it does not actually matter
Since I only worry about things I can change and just accept everything else

Yeah it does matter. The equation of reincarnation. You can possibly change your reincarnation destination

I have absolutely no intention of living another life
Since I plan on dying and then staying dead forever

Good luck with that

You gonna use your magic powers?

We do not have any magic powers
We do not believe in any nonsense

you believe you have the power to not ever be born

Me being born is not something that I have any control over so the question is academic
And I shall leave you alone with your strange thoughts since this getting a little bit silly