Anglo-Saxons, Christians, Jews

The U.S.A. is a mix of Anglo-Saxon protestant-paganism, Christianity, and Judaism. The original British colonizers of the United States were men of a strictly anglo-saxon cultural predisposition. The Irish and Scottish in particular, resisted English monarchical control over the British Empire. They were rebellious. And even the British monarchy themselves, resisted Catholic dominion of Christianity, from the mainland of Europe. The English Kings did not want to heed the word of The Pope. Thus, the Divine Right of Kings stood in direct conflict and protestant, against the Divinity of God Himself, The Pope and His Papacy. By this conflict, between Anglicisim and Catholicism, the English setup their own “Church of England”, a mock form of Catholicism, a shadow copy. Throughout the previous millennium, Anglicism has stood at odds with Catholicism, demonstrating the conflicted history of the British Isles, its people, and the British Empire.

The British Isles has a very unique history of warfare, with factions and clans fighting each other since the beginning. Long ago, the Native Anglicans inhabited the pristine islands and defended it. The Germanic and Celtic Saxons invaded, sometime, long ago. And these waves of conflict occurred between these two distinct tribes, Anglos, the Modern English people, and Saxons, English-Germanic crossbreeds. Out of the fight between Anglos and Saxons, clans, alliances, and factions were formed over time. And this is not including the spread of Rome into the British Isles, represented by the French “Franks”. So what we really need to understand about Anglo-Saxon descended people, today, is that they exist as a composition between three different powers–the native Anglicans (English), the invading French (Romans), and the invading Germans (Saxons).

As if this was not complicated enough, there was a forth, very important invader. These were the Norman “Norse”, the Scandinavians.

Anglican culture alone, isolated, represents European Romanticism, from the Roman Franks, and Anglican, native English paganism. These two groups, the English and French, are more closely, genetically and culturally related, than either English and French are to Germans and Scandinavians, on the British Isles. So it goes like this, Englishmen and Frenchmen, against German Saxons and Scandinavian Norsemen. The British Empire, thus, has a four part genetic composition and a two part cultural disposition. All of this combined, gives us the “Anglo-Saxon” culture, religion, society, and history.

Anglicism is a mock form of Catholicism. You could hardly call it “Christian”. But people make this confusion. True “Christianity” is a Romantic Tradition, of the Romans. Christ was born to the Roman Empire. And we can call the Franks also as Romans. But this has a loose, if any connection, to the Anglo-Saxon (AS) people. What AS people believe, is divorced from Christianity, almost completely. And because the AS people colonized and spread throughout the United States, this has given the people of the United States, and the West in general, a very perverse sense of “Christianity” and “Christ”. If a man desires to know “Christ”, then he should at least seek out a Roman, a Frank, an Italian, a Greek, or even a Spaniard, to authorize this Catholicism. Because the AS people have no sense of “Christianity”. It is a bastard form.

From this bastard form of Christianity, the United States has created three very perverse, and very popular forms of Christianity. These are the Mormons, Puritans, and Evangelicals. Minor forms of U.S. Christian sects ought to include Baptists, Adventists, Lutherans, Amish, and Unitarians. If there are others, then they ought to be irrelevant to postmodern history. Further perversions of U.S. culture include the new Scientology movement and the new Nietzschean movement. But both Scientology and Nietzscheanity, are offshoots of this “mock Christianity” and general AS perversion of Catholicism.

History needs restored.

The point of this thread is to demonstrate this brief history of Anglo-Saxonism, most of you on this forum are directly or indirectly involved in ASism or “Asism”. You are believers and participants in Anglo-Saxon history, no matter which sect of false Christianity you believe in. You are excluded from this, if you are a descendant of Catholicism. Catholicism is almost universally opposed to Asism “Protestantism”. The third party to this cultural conflict, is Judaism, who are loosely connected to Catholicism and Christianity. So it goes like this.

Leftism-----Anglo-Saxonism-Protestantism-------------------Center------Catholicism—Christianity----------------Judaism—Rightism

This should be a decent model of general U.S. culture and religion. As you can see, Asism is distinctly opposed to Judaism in terms of “left” and “right” politics. However! Both Asism and Judaism are very, very liberal.

Liberalism—Judaism—Anglo-Saxon-Protestantism----------Center----Christianity-------------------------------Catholicism–Conservatism

AS and Jews agree on “liberalism”. These are the “Neo-Conservatives”, the new AS political part merging with Judaic cultural values. The reason for this merger is prophetic, and due to the nature of general Protestant prophesies. We must make a distinction between Protestants, Christians, and Catholics. Protestants are NOT Christians. Catholics are. Mormonism, Evangelicalism, Anglicism, Puritanism, are all NOT forms of Christianity. These are forms of Protestantism. People confuse “Protestant” with Christianity. This is because people in the U.S. have no coherent or realistic notion of european history. They are almost completely ignorant, thus giving the possibility of Protestantism to rise in the first place.

The “Neo-Liberals” are Anglo-Saxon-Protestants who are anti-semitic. If you are a Neo-Liberal, then you are, almost necessarily, anti-semitic. Why is this the case? Because Anglo-Saxonism is built upon cultural distinctions and identities, which are opposed to Judaic identity and cultural practices. While Asism and Judaism share many liberal traits, specifically, Anti-Authoritarianism. Anglo-Saxons and Jews both hate central, male authority. They cannot stand Monarchy and Royalty. Because both sets of ideologies refuse the “Divine Rights of Kings”. But Judaism has some exceptions, based on religious prophesy. Jews believe in the “Divine Rights of Kings” strictly according to Judea-christian prophesies. Anglo-Saxons do not have this tradition or belief. This is where the division between “West” and “East” truly begins, in U.S. culture.

The Norse pagans are different, and I won’t go into their history and culture too much. But the Norse invaded Great Britain, conquered them, and setup strains of Monarchy and Bureaucracy which still stand today, including the current Monarchy and Royalty of the former British Empire. The Norse are the exception to Asism and Judaism. You can see this by way of World War 2, and the focus of Nazi Germany on Norse Paganism, including Arianism and Zoroastrianism. Hitler had to dispose of Jewish overpopulation in Germany, due to the inherent conflicts setup between Germanic and Jewish ideologies. Hitler wanted a strictly Germanic homogeneity that completely excluded Jews and Judaism. International Jewery could not accept this, and could not accept exclusion from the European populace, which Jews had spent literally hundreds and thousands of years, to integrate into. Jews wanted to conquer Europe. And they have. World War 2 marked the end of a Germanic, European people owing to the continent of Europe. The Jews proved superior to Germany, and perhaps Germanicism in general, including the remnants of the Saxon, Celtic tribes and peoples. The inner conflict of Europe was sealed, by the defeat of Nazism in World War 2.

The Slave Morality which Nietzsche had spent his lifetime to deconstruct, proved superior. Indeed, Nietzsche was “born too soon” as he prophesized.

The destruction and deconstruction of Master Morality in Europe, has precluded a new age or new transition or new “era”, which we see in U.S. culture today. Because although the European history has come to an end, a newborn history has just emerged, in “The Americas”. Pezer is wrong. “America” is just one country. We are the whole of the continent from north to south, west to east. “America” is the new “Europe”. Maybe we should just outright rename it, to “New Europe”. Because this is the age of transition.

The United States is experiencing a massive, inner tumult, right now, as I type this. There is a battle for supremacy between Anglo-Saxon general Anglicism, remnants of Christianity as Old Catholicism, and Judaism as a whole. Jews, having proved superior and confident after the defeat of Nazism in Europe, are taking more risks to assert themselves as the new “Supermen”, a stolen concept from the defeated Germanic ideologies. Jews want to enslave white and black “goys”. This is you. You are probably a goy. But the problem with Jewish supremacy in the United States is…it is unfounded. It is new, almost completely new. This could not have been possible 70 years ago, but it is possible now.

What this reflects is a division between these three overarching sections of culture in the U.S. Protestantism, Christianism, and Judaism.

We can even throw in more complexity here, if you want more to chew on. Islam. The advent of 9-11 has changed this cultural battle even further. While Protestians “Anglicans”, Christians, and Judians were attempting to subvert each other through the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, and up to 2000… 9-11 has introduced a forth party into the United States, and Western people in general. And this is the introduction of Islam and Muslims in the New World. This is actually damning to Judains. Jews and Muslims share more in common with each other, than even European Jews share with Christians or Protestians. We can divide cultural sects, then, into four parts, peoples, and histories–Paganism is European, Christism is Romantic, Judaism is Judaic, and Islam is also Judaic. Jews and Muslims are both “Easterners”, and never truly integrated into European or Pagan societies, peoples, or cultures.

There are genetic divisions here. Genes are Moral [Geneaology of Morality]. Europeans are genetically pagans. Christians are genetically romans. Jews and Muslims are genetically judeans. We can split these cultures and groups like this. They each have different beliefs, different values. Different ideologies, traditions, and histories. We can see these splits genetically. Moral beliefs are passed on genetically.

This is all I want to say for now. This is mainly an introduction into why the United States is so complex to both internal citizens, and outside foreigners. People who cannot understand these cultural paradigms, will never EVER understand the general U.S. culture, our previous history, our current history “Postmodernism”, or what is about to happen next in the End Times. You will stay surprised, shocked, stunned, and bewildered, unless you get off your lazy ass, and do just a MINOR BIT of reading. It’s not difficult to dig this information up. A quick search outside your normal crap, ought to be sufficient.

And this ought to be the standard, for a philosophy forum. If you don’t understand this, generally, then your philosophy is going to be amateurish at best and nonexistent at worst.

Science in Western society favors atheist anglo-saxons and jews. It does not favor christianity. Both atheistic anglo-saxon and jewish cultures are destroying christianity in the united states through the use of “science”. Jews in particular want to see their non-jewish, “goy” servants crushed and humiliated, through their subservience to “science” as an end. All must bow to “science”. Why is this? Why has “science” become so powerful a tool and weapon?

Is science greater than philosophy in America?
Is science greater than religion in America?

To the first question, I say no. To the second question, I say yes. Americans still value strictly “western, christian, pagan” philosophy. Jewish philosophy is inferior, and struggles to put its foot in the door. Zionism is controversial to support. Jews do not have the social and cultural power, yet, to be more open about their narcissism and hatred for goys. The neo-conservatives, anglo saxon pagans and white jews, suffered excruciating losses in terms of cultural power and significance, with the failure of George W. Bush’s terms as President of America. Many have rejected what neo-conservative stands for, by siphoning inclusion of zionism into its ideology and foundation. Neo-conservatism also includes Evangelicalism, an extreme post-christian faith. The inner divisions of neo-conservatism exists between anglo-saxon protestanism, evangelical post christianism, and judaic zionism. These three parts comprise Neo-conservatism as a whole. If you, yourself are neo-conservative, then you must include yourself into one of these ideologies necessarily—anglo-saxon protestantism, evangelical post-christianism, or judaic zionism.

From the 1990s to now, the united states have become swept up in the fanaticism of “science”, as if “Science is the New God :banana-dance: :banana-dance: :banana-dance: !!!” But this is false. The New Age Atheist movement, figurehead by the “four horsemen”, comprised of two anglo jews Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris, and two anglo pagans, Daniel Dennett and Richard Dawkins. These men have spearheaded the “supremacy of science” as if science can replace religion.

But there is a fundamental problem to this. And I’ll tell your right now, educate you FOR FREE BECAUSE I AM SO NICE AND KIND AND GENEROUS WHILE YOU DON’T TEACH ME ANYTHING…

Science is not epistemological. It’s not based on objectivity or knowledge. Science is based on EXPERIENCE. Science is based on SUBJECTIVITY. The Western philosophies have been duped. And this might have come about through Hume’s “contribution” to western “logic” by induction. But, the problem is one of Perspective. What is science?

Science is this----observing the world, subjectively, hypothesizing a statement, subjectively, testing a statement according to your own paradigm, subjectively, recording data on experiments, subjectively, critiquing your experiments through peer review, subjectively, and establishing theorems and paradigms, subjectively.

There is NO POINT AT ALL in which the “scientific” process is ever objective. EVER. It’s never been done in the history of history. The confusion of objectivity in science, that, science can pose “objective” facts, is a misnomer. It’s a false assumption. This is a remnant of the time before “science” even existed. Before “science”, it was called “natural philosophy”. Science is an extension of philosophical SUBJECTIVISM, not objectivity.

Objectivity remains, to this day, a matter of Divinity and Religion, a matter of Theism and Theology and Teleology.

The Nietzschean cultists are subjectivists, NOT objectivists. This is their fault, AND the fault of the New Atheist Movement AND Zionism. What the Nietzschean cultists, New Atheists, and Judaic Zionists all share in common…is a lack of universality, a lack of objectivity. For objectivity, we must turn to where Objectivity can exist, at all. And this is ‘G’. This is The Word of “God”, universality, complete objectivity, divinity. Universal Laws, Physics. Physics cannot exist without objectivity. Therefore, physics is NOT a science. Physics is a part of philosophy and religion, not science.

Physics is the “most unscientific” science, the least objective. Because in order to pose objectivity, physics must become teleological, positing “beginnings and ends”, such as those found by the limits of the Universe itself, the fraudulent “Big Bang”, the stupid “Big Crunch”. These are fantasies, illusions, grand falsity.

These are heretics posing as “Christian” men. These are “wannabe gods”. And the “scientologists”, the “science worshipers” and “New Age Atheists” who grovel at the feet of Steven Hawkings, or watch that stupid television show “Big Bang Theory”, are all a bunch of Satan worshipers!!! They worship Steven Hawking as if Steven Hawking were “God” Himself!!!

But, rest assured, there is very little “objective” about this type of “science”. Physics is NOT a science. It’s not. It’s religious. It has to be.

Objectivity is required for religion.
Subjectivity is required for “science”.

Philosophy exceeds the boundaries of both religion and science. O:)

Does this post come with its own dictionary. Please provide.

And the television show The Big Bang Theory is a hoot, not Satan worship … of course to enjoy it requires a sense of humor. Which this post had not even a shard of evidence. Laughter is a secret of the cosmos…

I think that’s a bit mixed up.
The first people migrated there 500,000 years ago. The Celts migrated there from central Europe in the 5th century BC. The Romans invaded 43AD, but withdrew 401 AD. The Anglos, Saxons, and Jutes invaded about 450 AD. These were all Germanic people, coming from what is now Denmark and the northern parts of Germany. So the Anglos are not native to England. The Vikings invade in 793 AD. The Vikings aren’t “Normans”, the Normans are French, and they invaded 1066 AD. The war between Normans and England ends in 1453 AD.

So it’s a mixture of Celts, Anglos, Saxons, Jutes, Vikings, and French. (However, today it’s now importing millions from the 3rd world).

Genetically, the Anglos, Saxons, and Jutes are related closer to the Germans and Vikings than the French. The Celts I am not sure of whom they’re closely related to.

Generally, I think this is correct. Protestantism is the root cause of today’s so-called egalitarian, humanitarian left. Protestantism is where the extreme suspicion of authority becomes a valid and ‘respected’ political doctrine and the dividing everyone up into individuals. You can see this clearly today in the modern Left with their hatred of authority of all descriptions and emphasis on the rights of weak individuals (not the strong, they must be punished for being strong).

So you are saying in general protestantism is against the beehive mentality. I don’t see it that way. Protestantism just believes in smaller beehives.

In fact, given the “body of Christ,” and " vine and branches" metaphors, Christianity in general is against individuality, and is a beehive mentality. Actually, all religions are beehive mentalities. There’s no such thing as a religion of one, or cult of one.

It’s the Arthurian Legends and questing for the Holy Grail where there’s no path that is strong on individualism.

The Big Bang theory used up it’s one running joke ages ago, it’s entertaining enough but not funny any more. 4 friends who live together format AGAIN which doesn’t help. American comedy is just formulaic shit these days. Said it before say it again, we are in the dark ages of US comedy, creativity and novelty.

Having met about 40 physics nerds at various times in my life, I have to say the show is totally unrealistic as well. Harking back to the 50s idea of what nerds are, not the 21st century where being a nerd has become 25% cooler in this information age. So its dated, has only one joke on a theme, and is not remotely funny because of it.

Sorry, I should have elaborated further.
Protestantism breaks up the stringent authority of the church by a number of avenues. One was it allowed the people the read the bible for themselves, rather than it being read to them through the clergy. It encouraged widespread education in order for literacy amongst the people. This encourages an individualism of sorts. The beehive mentality is severely fractured through individual interpretations of the bible; which leads onto to other “rights” for individuals. Protestantism eventually leads to the creation of the secular state and also individual rights over government infringement. The English were the best at espousing individual rights, this is why they have the classical liberal thinkers like Locke, Mill, and Burke arguing for minimal government. By this time though Protestantism isn’t really in the picture. But its after-effects are.

The “Irish” were probably the first native inhabitants of the British Isles.

These were the first “Anglican” tribes, who pushed the Native Irish out of their homelands.

No, Anglos were already there, and adapted to Roman occupation. The Native Anglicans mixed with Romans. Saxons and Jutes were the invaders. Anglicans were already there.

This is false.

I meant “Norsemen”, not Normans. That was a typo on my part.

Yes, but the first people on the British Isles were Irish, then Anglos, then Saxons, then Jutes Vikings and French last. Norsemen and Normans came at the end of British history.

That’s false.

The Anglos are genetically more closely related to Normans and Norsemen than to Germans. Saxons are closer to Anglos than to Germans. Jutes are closer to Germans. Irish are the outlier.

Anglos are not Germanic, but Saxons are Germanic.

Great wording, Fent, we agree about this.

I disagree. I think the Germanics and Norsemen were the best at espousing individual rights. The Nordic tribes resisted European catholicism better than the Anglicans did. The Anglicans just copied Catholicism and renamed it. The Germanic Lutherans were different, and had a different reaction to catholicism. The Lutherans outright rejected many critical aspects of catholicism.

The germanic response against catholicism, christianity, romanticism, and judaism was much clearer to see in the 20th century. The Northern european pagans rallied against jewish and christian civilization, while the English Anglicans accepted it. This becomes evident by both the european world wars.

I am not sure we you’re getting this from.
The Anglos, or Angles, are German and arrived after the Roman occupation.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angles