Listen, its a an issue about factual truth which he doesn’t care about while continously trying to derail and detrack the arguement at hand, while never, ever responding to any of the counterpoints he claims doesn’t exist.
There is statistical information about psychological damage in war done about soldiers/combatants I named one great source for these. On the other point; as David Livingstone smith explains in “The Most Dangerous Animal” these psychological damage rates do NOT hold true to CIVILIANS in the same war zones. Faust tries to explain this away with nonsensical points about people being ‘forced’ into war (which would make all statistics about combatants globally useless when they are not).
He’s wrong and acts indecently about it, i’ll reply like I see fit.
Dude, I don’t want to buy the book. Just give me some links that back up what you say. I have found reports of several studies - none backs you up. You claimed that ten minutes of googling would do the trick.
May - I have not insulted this guy. Quote me - tell me how I have insulted him. I can certainly quote him to that effect.
They can immagine that the cute little things are 100% nice, because they cant express their thoughts as well. Thats my guess anyway. However I would say that the majority of people I know care more about human life than animal. It’s a shame we dont have exact figures, but I’m not sure that its a survey that would have been done or if it has, one that would have been done properly
Unless you visit mental wards all the time to be taking this survey, the people you are asking are just blowing smoke. None of them in practice, would have an easier time watching a cancer patient suffer say, compared with an animal that needed medical attention.
IN Practice almost no one feels that way, despite what they are willing to say about it.