Anyone here into Stylistics or Computational Linguistics?

For those who aren’t, it’s a branch of the study of language, that usually involves word and phrase frequency or average sentence length, among other inspections. It was used to identify the una-bomber, attributing authorship to his manifesto.

I’m just getting into it and find it fascinating. Anyone go to school for this, or study it on their own?

I truly wonder if computers will ever write a best selling book or create a best original screenplay.

Its a derivitive of voice recognition where a reverse topographic model is created subsisting of similar characteristics as facial De cognition

Just a guess …of coming unattractions…

like deep fake porno . . . ? just another guess.

Be yond(err) Arian fallacies. One …never knows for sure

One can never be certain from the ground up.

A certain potency or poignancy, complained Portnoy.

Ok the nonobug sighs with affrontal melonchaly

haha, that’s me in a bug shell. :smiley:

not directed at you, but this is melon collie, affronted

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97sYm0Bkd3Y[/youtube]

Now you know I could if I really wanted to, given access to the right interplay of mirroring affects/effects.or could I or even should i?

Well, thinking of Céline…in my own days as a security guard.

I don’t know about you, but my nights as a guard had a thick atmosphere.

Yes, I will finish celine now that he’s in america.

I know this branch. It’s not that evolved.

The unibomber was caught because his brother turned him in.

It was his brother, without any psych-linguistic training that knew for a fact that the manifesto was written by his brother decades ago.

right, but I would venture to guess fbi linguists had testified in court. They were after all the ones who greenlit publication for that reason.

It doesn’t have to be that evolved to grow and and gain interest among some. Besides, the turning test for some blog articles has already fooled a bunch of people who didn’t realize ai wrote it. I’d say its a relevant study with the major current trends in tech. Sorry to disagree.

But the panpsychic forces reveal u to be winding down interest, so adieau, until the next kick of inspiration reveals it’s born again demi urge. In fact as previously indicated I was borne upon the wings of disagreement to agree.

To clarify: i’d rather nOT but with infinite patience take it to some limit, as to reassure you that my concern is absolutely nor referential, lest you perhaps get that damnable impression.

yeah, second wind maybe

Oh … no, no, no

You can disagree with me.

Here’s the deal though…

There’s a reason why parodites wont let shiggoth debate me… I’d destroy that machine.

ilovephilosophy.com/viewtop … 1#p2846891

two things, it doesn’t have to know why beating you in chess is a bad thing if it can simulate having a bad feeling about it. I half believe that, anyway.

secondly, for some reason, as bad as the result is, tons of people continue to buy chess and go game boards. There was a damn shortage of go boards after the best go player was defeated. Wow. What can one really take away from that?

People are wasting their minds. If you choose a competition it damn well be one that gives everyone everything they want at the expense of nobody.

Otherwise, your life meant nothing.

Now. I’ll be perfectly honest. I’m the only human capable of this. Am I judging people for being mentally handicapped? No. I’m not.

Barkley Babes said:

“yeah, second wind maybe”

me no says :

"There really is no outward reason to suppose any noticeable difference between the first gust and the second, from the point of view of that melange, who was quoted to say that “my wings are cut”.

I’m fairly sure my reluctance to name any one stems from a deep desire not to be banned, not to speak of my stuff-s limited appeal to generate the wide interest that would access any particular reader of this forum.

So it’s merely hersay nothing else.

Now it’s my turn to come out of the woodwork with total honesty: years ago when I went under a different name: Orby, I was matched up with someone in a chest game and win, in spite of confusing me with an ongoing boxing match at the same time .

That i won on a technicality offered me no respite. Since.

But that has no bearing here much, except the dark ravages of timeless curiosity to realize the predicament I landed in.

That would be the mystery of chessboxin

People waste a lot, not much I can say there. A famous Russian author once called the human race ungrateful wretches, and I agreed with him, at least at the time.