Are you a racist?

[phyllo]

Okay. Now I’m confused. The rolling eyes seemed to be saying that my analysis was not correct - that removing the added detail that the child is a family member is not the better approach.

So what are you saying?

[MagsJ (..a chic geek)]

@phyllo

Okay. Now I’m confused. The rolling eyes seemed to be saying that my analysis was not correct - that removing the added detail that the child is a family member is not the better approach.

So what are you saying?

…that Urwrongx1000’s scenario was flawed, as who Who WHO would save someone else’s child over their own, so not an indicator for racism, but for stupidity

[phyllo]

…that Urwrongx1000’s scenario was flawed, as who Who WHO would save someone else’s child over their own, so not an indicator for racism, but for stupidity

Okay, that clarifies it.