Well the devil who can only lie would say that wouldn’t he.
I just don’t pursue a science whose foundational claim is that attractive and repulsive electromagnetic forces absolutes cancel out which is a lie.
NO. YOU are!! ner nicky ner ner
Go and learn about facts rather than lies Sculptor.
Go and ask any scientist in the world to explain how all the attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force interactions NN,NS,SN,SS cancel out that exist right now between all spinning matter with N and S poles at both the macro and micro levels.
They won’t be able to tell you because they’ve lied.
Don’t take my word for it.
This is your problem Sculptor.You will believe anything you are told.
You are so gullible.
The whole of their science collapses overnight/becomes worthless just on the one fact that it’s impossible to cancel out attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force absolutes.
What about?
Which facts?
You really don’t get it Sculptor.
Atheistic science doesn’t have a science because it claims that attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force absolutes cancel out which is a lie and therefore atheistic scientists don’t consider these force absolutes in a balanced scientific theory because they have their religious belief system biases.
They have come up with a mythical 4th force called ELECTROMAGNETISM which isn’t a force at all if attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force absolutes cancel out as atheistic scientists claim.
One again ask any scientist in the world in which direction does this mythical force ELECTROMAGNETISM act and they can’t tell you.Their theories are complete nonsense.
Einstein guessed that mass bends space time which is impossible because mass is balanced out in space because all matter levitates in space.
The strong and weak forces had to be mathematically invented because all matter can’t be held together otherwise.These mythical forces are merely glue (gluons) to mend a broken theory.
It’s all cognitively biased nonsense Sculptor which is now being revealed by the JWT.
These scientists aren’t very clever Sculptor.Why do you give them so much credit? They pat themselves on the back and they have proved nothing at all scientifically because Einsteins theories don’t work and they know it.
The present scientific model is going to be totally scrapped.
You are philosophically,scientifically and psychologically very naive.
Consider this my last post to you.
I do not often spend much time on an analysis like this, but I thought I’d make a one time exception due to your persistence..
But really, this response is far more than you deserve. SO let’s look at what you are saying.
This entire statement is a confused, self-contradictory attack on modern physics that reveals a deep misunderstanding of the subjects it tries to critique. The attempt to label science as “atheistic” already exposes a fundamental category error. Science is a methodology—a systematic approach to understanding natural phenomena through observation, experimentation, and rational inference. It is not a belief system and certainly not one with a theological position. Scientists, religious or not, follow the same principles of empirical rigor. Calling science “atheistic” is an attempt to dismiss it on ideological rather than evidentiary grounds, which is not only intellectually dishonest but wholly irrelevant to the validity of scientific theories.
The claim that electromagnetism isn’t a real force because attractive and repulsive forces cancel out is not just wrong—it’s embarrassingly naive. Forces do not cease to exist because they are balanced. If two people pull on a rope with equal force in opposite directions, the rope does not float in a mythical vacuum of non-existence; the forces are still very real, just net-zero. Electromagnetism is one of the four fundamental interactions in physics and is extremely well-validated. It governs everything from the behavior of atoms and light to the workings of your smartphone and MRI machines. The idea that no scientist can explain its direction is demonstrably false. The electromagnetic force acts along the electric field vector and is described precisely by Maxwell’s equations, which have been tested and confirmed for over 150 years.
As for Einstein, the dismissal of his theories as mere “guesses” betrays a laughable ignorance of how general relativity works. Einstein didn’t just “guess” that mass bends spacetime; he formulated a mathematically rigorous theory with clear predictions—many of which have been spectacularly confirmed, from gravitational lensing to the precise orbit of Mercury to the detection of gravitational waves. The claim that “all matter levitates in space” as if this somehow invalidates spacetime curvature is not a scientific argument; it’s an incoherent assertion lacking even internal logic.
The criticism of the strong and weak nuclear forces fares no better. These are not “invented” forces or mathematical band-aids. They are the product of decades of empirical research, particle accelerator experiments, and theoretical work that led to predictions such as the existence of the W and Z bosons, later confirmed experimentally. Gluons, which mediate the strong force, are not “glue to fix a broken theory”—they are an essential part of quantum chromodynamics, the theory that accurately describes how quarks are bound into protons and neutrons. If this theory were wrong, high-energy physics experiments across the globe would not yield results in such close agreement with its predictions.
The appeal to the James Webb Telescope (which is presumably what “JWT” refers to) as if it is somehow “revealing” that current theories are nonsense is a complete fabrication. Webb is providing unprecedented detail about the early universe, galaxy formation, and exoplanet atmospheres—but none of its findings have invalidated general relativity, quantum field theory, or the standard model of particle physics. This is a textbook example of someone using scientific terms and instruments they do not understand to lend false credibility to a confused and ideologically driven screed.
Ultimately, this is not a critique of science—it’s a rejection of it. And not because the author has better evidence or insight, but because they refuse to engage with the actual content of what they oppose. It is the rhetorical equivalent of accusing the dictionary of lying because one doesn’t like what the words mean. If there is a broken theory here, it is not in physics—it is in the logic, understanding, and intellectual honesty of this non-argument.
So run along.
1 Like
Don’t bother responding Sculptor if you don’t want to.
The science you believe in is false and proven to be so.It’s a FACT.
Why? because attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force ABSOLUTES do not cancel out as claimed by mainstream scientists.The science you believe in is unbalanced and cognitively biased and adopts unknown mathematically invented man made forces which do not exist.
So run along and be deceived further if you want to.You can’t say that you haven’t been warned,for the record.
I gave you a comprehensive response.!!
you can think me later, but you will have to read it first.
Sorry if you were scared away by som many words.
You don’t scare me Sculptor.Don’t be silly.
Let the dust settle a bit and maybe you will see sense.
My philosophy,science and psychology is balanced and unbiased and makes perfect sense and explains all of the sciences.
You only need 2 attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force absolutes and spin to explain all of science.
Nikola Tesla was right.
You gave him a pretty decent response, but that’s not what he wants.
I’m not sure dude himself knows what he wants here.
He’ll never know.
He answers no questions, and never responds to statements.
He relies on a set of prejudices that he continaully reacts to without much thought.
A pretty decent response lol…whatever.
You guys need to tune into what is actually happening rather than what you are told is happening by cognitively biased +=- and -=+ scientists who haven’t the first clue what they are talking about.
Mainstream science is collapsing before our eyes.People have had enough of BS.
You at least got a glimpse of who might be the “cognitively biased” scientists? 
Cosmology and Particle Physics is a total farce and even scientists who have been in these professions will tell you this.The slate needs wiping when it comes to these two scientific disciplines.
It’s a total farce because its all been founded on a cognitively biased +=- and -=+ starting philosophy.
The JWT is finally confirming what some of us already knew.
You guys need to wake up and tune into reality.
The games up.
+/-=+/- philosophy doesn’t prove or disprove the existence or non existence of a God.But it’s the correct philosophy that explains the scientific reality of the cosmos.
The only two forces in the cosmos are attractive and repulsive electromagnetic force absolutes that are vibratory balanced out by the formula N/S=N/S.The spin speed of particles regulates the frequency of the NN;NS;SN;SS electromagnetic force interactions and thus the electromagnetic energy waves emitted from all matter types.
An individual interprets electromagnetic energy waves emitted from all vibrating matter.These energy waves are picked up by the body’s senses.
The individual is neither vibrating matter nor electromagnetic energy waves.
FACT!!!
LOL is that an atheist cognitively biased or theistically biased “scientist”.?
Both.
+=+ and -=- theistic philosophy doesn’t explain science either.
Mere theism is the cancer in society as well.
Even the devil believes in God.
Atheism/Theism=Atheism/Theism is binary.
Of what use is ethier Atheism or Theism on their own to anyone?
Its doing the will of God that matters.