I’ll just add this to my lists of websites where I have been banned and deemed a dis-orderly fellow.
sciencechatforum.com/bulletin/index.php ( Bastards.)
I believe my last post went somthing like this:
I am also banned from this website too.
Just somthing else to add under my belt of achievements.
Truely ILP is the most tolerant of philosophy websites and the last centers of free speech.
I have thought about joining the RichardDawkins forum as a entertaining idea but I am sure I will be banned from there too eventually.
Tolerance is for the weak though right?
And I would say the richarddawkins forums aren’t that restrictive, i’ve seen threads advocating slavery go on for many pages.
Secular humanists …
ugh.
I think I’ll do something naughty to get myself banned properly …
Any ideas?
Just speak freely. You will definately get banned for that.
In many instances yes. I just like pointing out other people’s hypocrisy. I delight in crushing sacreligious beliefs.
I’ll try my luck there. 
I have been banned from so many sites I can’t keep track of them anymore. 
Good seeing you post Merakon. I wish you would post more often because I believe there is some excellent “ideas” within yourself just waiting to be expressed.
Then you’ll have to play solely on ILP, with us! 
Websites are property, houses if you will. The folks that own them have the right to make the rules. When you cross their rules it is a type of vandalizing. Its their house, they have the right to enforce their rules. Would you want someone to come in and destroy disrupt and vandalize your house? When entering these websites you are a guest in someone elses home. If you don’t like the rules, leave. Its no different than if you enter a person’s home. A guest is expected to behave with respect.
That being said; There are ways to do it that are much more entertaining, rather than blatant disruption. If you simply think these people are horrible people and need disruption, skirt the rules very closely stay within the boundries just barely. You will get people to cross those lines and make them look like complete idiots. But, they can’t touch you, you never broke the rules. I find this way much more challenging and productive. There are a couple of places I go that I do this. Wording is important, a certain mastery of the language is quite helpful. Hit them , then act innocent, be innocent, Even very well mannered. It has a way of pissing people off. You tie their hands by following the rules. I find this way much more entertaining, informative and interesting rather than vandalizing their house. You can even change other peoples views by doing this. Those that follow will watch the exchange, it can produce some interesting results from them. 
Joker, you have serious issues and should see a trained psychologist before you hurt yourself or others.
I am completely serious, and am not saying this to hurt your feelings or to insult you.
i was banned from stormfront and stirpes back in the day several times
Somehow I imagine I will survive and persevere… 
That was fucking hilarious. Thanks I needed the laugh. 
Cool. 
I joined the Richard Dawkins site. Look for me as DionysianJoker.
I wasted 10 bloody minutes getting this.
Hope y’all are satisfied …
You’re retard. Joker’s perfectly fine.
He’s fucking insane, man. He’s obsessed with rape, for one thing, and he has this weird fucking problem with authority.
I think that’s Joker’s only view i find totally unpalatable!
The problem with authority I can understand: as a lot of people have this problem with authority, too / now the rape fixation is weird and worrying: as rape is illegal for a reason (a fact that Joker hates hearing). The fixation seems to be with the fact that the ‘victim’ is not easy/beyond the reach of the attacker, and therefore more appealing than if she was up-for-it… 
No, not really. Seems like it’s based on primitivist stylings that are represented in his presupposition that rights don’t exist. Anarchy type stuff. Taking Darwinian domination as philosophy.