Should Mick leave, because he is proving himself incapable or unwilling to philosophize?
- Yes!
- no…
I say Mick should stay in england and move his spammy as out of ilp. All in favor, click.
Should Mick leave, because he is proving himself incapable or unwilling to philosophize?
I say Mick should stay in england and move his spammy as out of ilp. All in favor, click.
NO. I think what he post is not philosophy but so fuck what.
I don’t think we should just ban people for whatever ticks
us off. Then we should ban you for wanting to ban mick,
I mean in the end, all the banning just gets stupid.
NOOOOOOOOO banning of people.
Kropotkin
Ha ha ha, it seems my presence here is making some atheists rock n’ roll, I’ve seen it all before, they can’t beat me in debate so they start squawking “ban him”!
I also detect a whiff of fear from them
Just so you know, I am an atheist. I stood up for you
because banning people is stupid and unnecessary.
And you do not smell fear from me, for the simple reason
god does not exist.
Kropotkin
No try to reason with him… psmlll … Or just ignore him… I’ll take the latter… peace
I can’t beat my dog in a debate either…He just won’t see the light, I keep telling him he needs to repent his sins… Ahh well… I guess all dogs don’t go to heaven huh…
You nasty boys need to lighten up.
MOVED.
A
For the record, ILP is an ENGLISH site!
Mike, where are these threads in which nobody can beat you in a debate on god? Always happy to help fix that…
I refer you to this thread:
ilovephilosophy.com/phpbb/vi … p?t=150905
You made an ass out of yourself there too. This is not a secular site, and this is not the way to get someone banned. [size=50]The way to get someone banned is to wind them up so that they insult you repeatedly, then you make a complaint to a moderator. Do this two or three times, or enlist the help of someone else to make it seem more plausible, and you’ll see results.[/size] But this is like ‘hands up who doesn’t like Amanda’. It’s for 14 year olds. However, you may be 14, in which case you won’t understand a word that I’m saying…
What SIATD said. He has a frighteningly accurate idea of how things work around here.
To the contrary we need more like Mick. This is normal evolution. We are all one. How elitist of you to think otherwise and protest against evolution.
Who is Mick?
Evolution, like Justice - is blind - and, like the plot of a daytime soap - directionless. A ‘natural’ process should not be equated with a ‘good’ process.
Time to lay the thumb of aesthetic judgement on the scales of that blind cow.
Tab
What a terrible thing to think. How elitist and judgmental. Who are you to think that you have aesthetic judgement? Of course the natural process is best. You must learn to trust man’s nature. How can you learn without trust?
Tab, we are all one and you must trust in our universal oneness to get what we deserve.
We are all one. Or rather, all ones. Each pathless path winds outward from a single pair of feet to embrace the myriad tracks of the celestial Gigapede.
Btw - My Tao’s bigger than yours.
Tab
All this trouble because of a single pair of feet. Jesus stressed the importance of washing the feet but did we listen? No. So look what happened.
Hrrmmmmph…circumsised no doubt.
Absolutely, and I’ll admit, it does leave me in a quandry as to where to put my loose change.
saitd,
If winding 'em up actually worked, they would have banned me a couple of years ago…
Tab,
Nick get’s his rocks off annoying “the great beast”. Acknowledging him in any way is contributing to his orgasmic pleasure of pretentious putziness.
tz,
Bans are a last resort and are not determined by a democratic polling of the membership. If you don’t like his posts, ignore them.
I was tired. And dumber yesterday than today. And yes I am 14. An I apologise for this post.