Burning Cash Hoards

globalpost.com/article/67343 … ti-strikes

Basically, the cash hoards have been targeted and blown up.

My question is… does the value of national currencies that constituted that hoard go up, or down as a result?

The bills before and after definitely would take a statistical dip, as far as existing goes, but do less bills automatically equate to a stronger currency? By stronger, I mean more buying power per bill?

What if nothing happens? No apparent fluctuation, despite blowing up hundreds of millions, perhaps billions, of dollars. What does this say about daily fluctuations of money markets, in relation to black markets, or third world banks using US Counterfeit currency not accepted by larger, national banks and overseas banks, but used as a low class currency. Do they all have a play in currency volatility, or do our markets only track institutions that trade with other institutions well regulated, taxed and tracked?

The amount they blew up is not a significant amount to markets. It would only affect the owners of that money. To affect markets a few major printing establishments would have to be destroyed. At least it could or should. Now most money is not in cash it is in computer accounts. That is where the real fear and affect is.

They’ll be banning cash before long.

So what then, is the harm in say, Joker having his own minor printing press for making currency, over ISIS losing a far more substantial operation? If, of course, it doesn’t matter.

You would need to understand something economists call a multiplication factor -only a small percentage of a nation’s wealth exists in the form of physical currency. But because of this multiplication factor, relatively small changes in the volume of physical currency available can have a much bigger impact on the overall total money in circulation.

If say Joker wanted to set up his own printing press, as a means of destabilizing some major currency, this would probably do little to advance his anarchist ambitions. Introducing more currency into the system (provided your fake bills can pass as real) would lead to inflationary pressures. For most countries, this would do little to destabilize their financial system, as deflation is the bigger threat right now. He’d likely be more effective if he could get his hands on a lot a cash and just burn it -not quite as profitable as counterfeiting however. But this coalition strategy of targeting ISIS currency reserves is doing just that -it’s a strategy that is likely to backfire.

For the record I personally despise money and see it as just another totalitarian form of control however with that aside I also understand the inherent selfishness of human nature where I am fully aware it isn’t going away anytime soon.

I do like studying the history of money and economics however as it is a very effective precursor to understanding human power, malice, or tyranny.

As for societies going cashless into electronic currencies this move is all about positioning a further stranglehold on humanity in the creation of a global totalitarian state.

They want all of humanity to drink two liters of pepsi a day.

Lets say his ambitions aren’t aimed at destabilizing the government, or the currency, but merely a attempt to destabilize his chronic poverty, found he was good at it, and became ambitious.

Nobody knows it’s him, they aren’t even aware of a master counterfeit operation out there.

Will they know? Will the money markets notice? Or does it go largely unnoticed, despite billions being pumped in all over?

My basic assumption is the reason the federal reserve operates as it does, in conjunction with Ft. Knox’s Hold Reserve, never really having a audit, is because a audit is pointless, kryptonite more or less to its success.

They operate off ambiguity… every trader, corporation, person with a bank account, has expectations for what is real, what is not. We highly regulate the middle players… banks, to force them to be very careful about who they lend loans out to… they want the smartest and best… everyone expect crash and burn cycles in the econony from this form of speculation (Marxism is pure speculation). As long as nobody really knows what is happening everywhere at once, the system remains solvent. Apple knows its market share compated to Microsoft, but Microsoft doesnt quite know it to Oscar Meyers, beyond holdings and ability to join in joint ventures… we allow absurdities like this to hapoen, but its usually like to like business mergers and ventures. Nobidy is quite sure what overall is happening… so these siesmic shocks we have to get occasionally have to be treated as just that… end of the world, or else everyone loses faith in the system. They want it based on something real… federal reserve gets it, but they are less concerned with real and more motivated by the need to make it feel consistently real.

This means, you gotta match the expextations of your smartest people playing in the economy, volitility is less a accudent and more design… my suspicion is guys like Smears who play volitility in tge markets will be progressively squeezed out of the market by new regulations over the next few decades, as they as essentially bullish parasites… they dont start businesses, dont produce, but technology lowers the threshold for increasing numbers of them. They’ll get flushed out, as the goal is to make material product, increase the physical wealth producing capacity. Its not uncontrollable yet, but will be a issue once new apps and systems increasingly try to figure out what the overall monetary wealth of the world is in real time. Thats doomsday for a federal reserve. It means thsy can’t fudge the numbers and say things arent that bad, or things arent going good. Money gets a independent sense of value, and loopy shit will occur. Industries left and right will crash and burn. No assets can back that.

its as close to Marxism we can get… you cant just print money for solving everything, they get pain and panic is a very will part of finance, you take it away and just say “we will print more” leads to industrial sloth abd decline. Why try that hard to put out new products, sell your products far away, compete, if all you had to do was “print more”. We wouldnt have industry, no farmers… we would starve as paupers without that incentive, and we know from controlled economies, like old China and the USSR, its a even worst system. Austrian Economics did a fantastic job diagnosing it… but at the same time Austrian Economics is one of many systems the Federal Reserve is simulating. It plays to its expectations the hardest. You expect a crash here… there will be evidence of one… but the reserve will weigh in, soften it. Wasnt one to begin with, we are simulating expectations from the finaces from the 1920s.

So its a game of expectations. I think uf physical money dried up… say from burning all the currency, we would notice money not showing up in the economy anymore… rations woukd be placed until more money could be printed.

I think short of everyone getting a massive suitcase with a million dollars, a few guys printing money would never get noticed… maybe the reserve woukd notice the same serial number on bills keep popping up, knowing something us going on, but wouldnt upset them too much… they can adjust, but needs to discourage it, as it risks threatening the realness of the system in everyone’s eyes.

There isnt a higher, more mature outlook. No “money is what we believe it to be”, print more attitude. Doesnt work, states that try fail. It isn’t whatever we want it to be… we would never accept it being that, system would collapse, it is it being what we expect it to be, both pleasurable and painful… it has to be painful on occasion. No one gets a infinite out.

I think the biggest test for my presumption would be sovereign wealth funds. In general, the Federal Reserve is only going to prop these up when it has to to keep countries necessary for the world economy in. Its a very bad idea long term for countries without physical assets… like Norway or Saudi Arabia will be post oil, to play the markets to keep undeserved socialism going.

A country that suddenly becomes a crucial war ally, in say, when a new international conflict pops up, will find it’s Sovereign Wealth Funds improving ever more… enough for them to venture paying for more soldiers, tanks, whatever is needed. Only some can come from market manipulation, rest will have to be nudged through Congress and Allies with new closer relations, and blah blah blah. Suddenly everyone will discover Norwegian Exports, like smelly fish, as a irresistible luxury. New branches of their banks will pop up all over, they’ll be able in “loan and invest”, nobody will really get what is going on. Lots of saavy people will be pictured in business suits shaking hands, and endless, mindless articles on psuedo-investment pop up.

I likewise think most large economies start steering far, far away from socialism and embrace capitalism once it finally occurs to their regulatory chiefs just what the US has been doing all along, how toxic Marxism is in terms of actually getting a economy running, yet how hopeless capitalism is for large states… works swell on small trader states, falls apart once it hits large scale, and periodic market crashes can ruin a republic permanently, like the Weimar Republic. Most successful way forward is to mirror the illusion, while encouraging the integration of your markets into theirs, while reducing the need to war on one another.

China gets it. US gets it. India is starting to. Some of Europe grasp this. Brazil, South America in general doesn’t have the slightest fucking clue to this day what is going on. Africa is a bit stumped, but some saavy local players are starting to get it.

We are more or less stuck with this till we figure out how to make Star Trek Replicators. If we make it too comfortable too fast, leads to system collapse. Too hard, system collapse. Just right leads to everyone striving, hitching, and scared. The people profiting the most aren’t necessarily the people pulling the strings on the puppet, but a necessary side effect. Its why I think someone like Joker could get away with mass counterfeiting… but only if he keeps his head down. You can’t be too notorious or obvious, and by default they gotta try to hunt your ass down if you are to restore faith in the system.

The system operates fairly smoothly if the vast majority of us never ask where all the money comes from in the first place.

The real shocks to the system are those things that can’t be anticipated. The Reserve knows that there is going to be a certain amount of counterfeiting, and a certain percentage of them are sort of going to get away with it. They can allow for this, based on probabilities. But you know what … we have Superman coins; we have Wonder Woman coins; and we even have Batman coins … these superhero coins from the RCM have proven to be pretty popular:

coinnews.net/2016/02/23/cana … ns-launch/

But alas, I guess super villains don’t have quite the same appeal as superheroes … but why shouldn’t the Joker have his own money?

Super villains need money also. Do you honestly think henchmen, secret lairs, and weapons are cheap or free?

Then there are travel expenses, women, and basic comodities or luxuries. Super villains have down time like everybody else.

Creating chaos and anarchy everywhere is tough fulltime work where one has to rest every once in awhile.