By request

It has recently been requested of me that I post more on Ernst Werklempter. This is gratifying, but something I can only do a little at a time. Most of the Great Man’s works have not been translated, a task which I spend many an hour at. Not to complain, but this undertaking is complicated by the fact that I speak almost no German, and so must do all my work with a german-english dictionary at my side. But I persist. Here are a few gems that I have recently uncovered.

These are all from his edifying but opaque, “Why I Wrote this Book”.

W on Hume: “I’ve read Hume, and frankly, I’m skeptical.”

W on Plato: “How do we know a cat is a cat? What else could it be? Take my cat. Please.” (A little known fact is that Ernst’s cousin, Hauser Werklempter, is the originator of the rimshot, as he was the house drummer at a Berlin nightspot called Der Poopenschaft. Kind of a burlesque house, where many acts - among them comedic ones - were performed.)

W on Hegel: “Thesis - I had a bad hard-cooked egg last night. Antithesis - I had a good soft-cooked egg this morning. Synthesis - I vomited them both up a couple of minutes ago.”

W on time: “You think time doesn’t exist? You weren’t on my last three dates.”

W on existence: “Last month my gout acted up. So did my cholick, and I’m sure my spleen, liver and kidney were distended. All this while bedridden with extreme dysentery, painful warts on my head, face, hands and feet, and an agonising swelling of the armpits, due to a cause unknown. My task then was to figure out how not to be. You morons. Fortunately I was able to recover, due to my generally strong constitution. And sheer force of will.”

Hope this will satisfy for now. Perhaps W’s views will prove provocative enough to cause some discussion. As I seem to be one of the few here familiar with him, I will be glad to help in any way I can.

I love it.

Twisted Short-cuttish logic… Ernst is definately worth some examination

Hopefully this thread will pick up some speed.

I am in awe… I just wish I could find more of his works…

did you search in german?

-Imp

Aporia - “Brief, crappy thread”? It was a brief crappy thread? Who was the author of this thread? Just wondering. You know, who wrote the crappy thread. Was it a guy called “monk”? Was it? The crappy thread, I mean. Just curious.

I mean, how crappy was it? Real crap? Or were you just disappointed at the brevity of the thread? Just wondering. I may know this “monk” guy. Imp might, too. He gets around a bit.

I vaguely remember that monk character from a board that I used to run. I loved the Hegel reference…

Hi, someoneisat. There are those who will say that W is simply regurgitating Hegel, but I think the truth is that he understands Hegel…eggsactly.

Shame? What is shame?

f

Monk? Might that be art monk? or perhaps
someone is channeling the spirit of Thelonious Monk?

As far as Ernst goes, I keep telling you all,
he is the greatest philosopher of all time.
I am presently researching some of his earlier works
and hope to come up with some critique of them.

I shall post when I can. As I am also busy writing a
philosophical poem.

Kropotkin

I actually think that he’s performing a radical reheating of the Hegelian stew - by using the metaphor of regurgitation with reference to the synthesis he is, perhaps, suggesting that synthesis isn’t not an end point but a departure at the origin itself.

as far as I’m concerned, we’ve all got a bit of Ernst Werklempter in us…

but Werklempter’s legendary urbaness is world reknown…

I figured it out… you probably did search in german, but did you search in east german?

-Imp

Hi, aporia. I can assure you that I am not an urban legend, or a legend of any kind. Well, I’m a bit of a legend in certain barrooms. Faust is my real name, and I am a real person, who used the name “monk” on the other board you visited. Hegel was a real guy, too. Surely you can find some reference to him. Imp is a real person, seperate from the rest. Hope that clears things up for you.

f

Werklempter on Marx:

Catch a man a fish, and you can sell it to him; teach him to fish, and you can sell him bait!

From each according to his abilities - to each according to his wife’s shopping habit!

Old locomotives are the locomotives of history!

The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways - the point is to find a way to grow tomatoes in this climate!

The production of too many useful things results in too many closets! (see “wife’s shopping habit”, above)

The bureaucracy is a circle from which one cannot escape. Do you have any idea what it takes to get a license to sell bait in this town?

How do I find some of this philosopher’s works? I am looking to expand my horizons in all things philosophical think. Your guidance will be much appreciated.

Hi, sand. There is a project afoot to bring more of the Great Man’s thought to light. Stay tuned. Do you wear a lot of t-shirts? Just wondering.

In the meantime, I present here another bit of Werklempter on Hegel, as someoneisat seems to be interested in such things. It is my own translation, from several years ago. I have recently added footnotes and made some corrections. The scholarship continues…

"Hegel’s genius: he was omnivorous - a truly gluttonous thinker. A fat philosopher, he swallowed the whole Universe(1)(2)(3) and all of time (Time) - his recipe contained every ingredient. While some have left their cake out in the rain*, he has his in his inside vest pocket, wrapped in paper, saved for later. In case he gets hungry and needs it. Clever that way, he was. Wish I had some cake.

Hegel’s downfall: he could not burp!"

(1) or, in some editions, “Universe whole”
(2) or, in one early edition, “Universe hole”, possibly a premonition of black holes
(3) or, in some editions, “whole universities” - perhaps a reference to the Young Hegelians movement. Or maybe not.

*This is the first known usage of this phrase, made famous later by Richard Harris, the actor/singer. Well, the actor, anyway. Loved him in Mutiny. And Silverado. Sucked in Camelot.

Hope this helps a little.

Fausty

I am reminded of the epic game - Mornington Crescent.

Hey Mmm,…faust, were your parents Goethe fans? …yeah I know, you’ve never heard that one before. Anyway, I still believe W’s take on bread making to be one of his greatest works (anti-crust indeed) to date. The man is a genius. As far as shirts go, nope, same old shirt. Other persuits were at hand, not to mention the daunting task of drafting my second philosophical post. Upon visiting the old playground, I witnessed that all too familiar wall head banging prompting me to meander, just a little, to places fresher. I see the doorman has been quite busy.

I wasn’t sure it was you, sandy. Glad you’re here, with your spritely mind.

As long as I am getting away with it, I will reproduce the piece you speak of, with some recent footnotes added.

This is from the Great Man’s mind-nourishing but nervewracking, “Gnashes to Gnashes, Rust to Rust”. (1) One of his many works on the existence of God and the history of religion. See also “Why I am Not an English Lord”.

sec 4,395 p 52

"God is bread, and we have eaten him. (3)

We wandered for generations, searching, ever searching for fertile fields of fecund faith, until we found the Promised Land of Arableness. We plowed through this land, like a frozen people trying to find the warmth of God. (4) We looked around and said ‘okay, we’re stopping’. Then we argued a lot. The women didn’t like the colors. The men thought the fishing wasn’t good enough. Then, someone said ‘Shut up already - you’re giving me a headache!’ We don’t know who.

Anyway, we planted the seed of God there on this land. We watered Him with our tears - tears for fears. (5) We waited. We watched. We played a primitive form of croquet on our days off. And, in time, He grew there, straight and tall as a stalk of wheat before us. We were so proud of Him! We harvested this bounty - and then we put Him through the mill. Oy vey! (6)

We bleached Him until He was pale as a spirit. We seperated Him from the chaff of worldliness. Then we began to make some dough from Him. Plen-ty of dough. Do-re-mi dough.

Once we started to make dough from Him, we of course kneaded Him more than ever. We kneaded Him and spread Him across the board. We spread him far and wide, to every corner of the kitchen counter. (7) We rolled Him and patted Him - the flour of our creation.

Then we baked Him. We made some bread, there, I can tell you. We watch Him rise with the yeast of our nurturing love. Then we sliced Him and toasted Him. Then we ate him. Some say it was a crumby thing to do.

Now, He is gone - consumed by the very forces that created Him. God is bread, and we ate Him. He was getting a little crusty, anyway."

I realise that some will say, “What does Werklempter know - he’s the anticrust”. But others will read this with a rye smile.

(1) translator’s note: Can be rendered, “Gnoshes”
(2) p. 53 in the illustrated Pimpzug edition
(3) in my earlier translation: “and we have baked him” - an error
(4) can be rendered (after comma) “like a bat out of hell”
(5) yep!
(6) can be rendered “Holy shit!”
(7) Werklempter is of course speaking metaphorically here - he really means ‘…to every corner of the table in the dooryard’.

Just one further note- for those who claim E. W. was a critic only and had nothing positive to say, I will mention appendix 73 of this work, paragraph 142 in the Sitzbaath edition, where he provides a delightful recipe for turnip and lamb’s knuckle soup. The mother’s milk can easily be substituted for.

Faust

Man, the genius dripping from this great mind’s mind is mind boggling. I mean, this guy is deep. He has an unfathomable depth. He works on and in so many layers it’s not funny. I better stop before I cause a scene.