I don’t feel good, so this is all I got right now… a Napoleon quote:
John - 9:41 Interlinear text
John 9:41 Parallel texts
( ohn 9:41 Meaning and Commentary
Last Updated on: December 15, 2025by Pastor David
“Jesus said unto them, If ye were blind, ye should have no sin: but now ye say, We see; therefore your sin remaineth.” – John 9:41 (KJV)
!()
“Jesus replied, ‘If you were blind, you wouldn’t be guilty. But you remain guilty because you claim you can see.'” – John 9:41 (NLT)
“Jesus said, ‘If you were blind, you wouldn’t be guilty. But since you claim you can see, your guilt remains.'” – John 9:41 (MSG))
Must I have the last word? Ok then, man yogi range to, the range is the lowest point in this mantra, the tantric pleasure denied as the ground, the dirt out of which the lotus flower is borne up.
…and as a parallel did not Jesu? Borne up in a manger?
[The name “Jesus” is derived from the Greek name “Iesous,” which is a transliteration of the Hebrew name “Yeshua” (ישוע). This name means “Yahweh saves” or “salvation” in Hebrew. Thus, “Jesus” and “Yeshua” refer to the same person, Jesus Christ, and both names convey the same theological meaning of divine rescue and deliverance. The name “Jesu” is a Latin form of “Iesous,” but it does not have a direct equivalent in Hebrew or Greek, making it less commonly used in religious contexts. ](Search - Microsoft Bing
5
The server messed up your image, here it is in another format:
My image? What was it and how was it represented, but I do like the one u posted, the paperfold plane, heck it is better the leanardo’s drawings of a flying machine!
Is that phenomenal,& am I like a dog in so thinking? They are man’s best friend and they do think, so ?
Can dogs think phenominally? - #619 by meno41 ?
It showed up like that, I’m really nosy, so I wanted to see what it was.. 
What was it, you tell me?
Who knows what dogs think? That they ponder things is, to me, pretty obvious
Thanks for that opinion.
But don’t you think it begs for a second opinion?
Or a third until the 41 st?
1 Like
I came up with this, because that’s what it converted to when I fed it in somewhere else..
That’s swell, is that a rocket, spaceship , or a paper plane?
Dunno, it was in your post. It is pretty cool though.
It kind of is, but then we’re faced with which of three things it may be.
The way to the nearest star-port? Something to warn people of the danger of nearby medieval arrowheads?
Sure, ask HG Wells, we are near that point of no return when we actually can go back to the future, who’d be able to tell except big brother who doesn’t exist?
I don’t believe time travel is possible, so I don’t give it much consideration, it is an entertaining idea though.
In case anyone moans about this getting off-topic, here’s something relevant:
What would a dog think of that symbol?
Do dogs interpret symbolism? We know that birds, simians, dolphins and cephalapods do, and can, but can dogs?
If a dog can associate an arbitrary symbol with an action or outcome, does that require phenomenal thought?
As for dogs let’s not forget they are still developing maybe taking parallel hyperbolic routs of catch up to get that bone or newspaper, maybe even exceeding human phenomenal rate of retrogression, has studies ever been shown lately of such backward time travel? Maybe we should try it with Charley and that is an ultra long. Shit, but why repress such an absurd thought.
No, but they stink and have appalling manners–same as their control-freak owners.
Everything alive is still developing, especially if it has a brain. What do you mean by retrogression? Developmental retrogression?
And I don’t know who Charley is..