cancer patient REQUIRED to receive chemo therapy?!

[Impenitent]

@Polemarchus

Imp wrote

…morality itself, like beauty, truth, evil or good et.al., are never directly percieved

A.C Grayling literally wrote the book on Berkeley. Check it out.

“Berkeley gives the name perception to any way of having ideas and notions before the mind, in sensing, conceiving, imagining, remembering, reasoning, and the rest. It is accordingly a generic term, and is not restricted to sensory perception alone.” Berkeley’s Argument for Immaterialism

I know bishop berkeley thought he could percieve morality- he was a shill for the church- I never said I thought berkeley was correct in all things did I? no; as an empirical matter, esse est percipi is correct.

…this is a world without absolute morality.

Back pedaling! You denied that both morality and moral agents exist, period. But now you’re qualifying your denial by the inclusion of the word, “absolute.”

nothing of the sort. I have denied that there is an absolute or simply objective standard of morality as berkeley (and any religious devotee) demanded. you have yet to produce one that can be empirically evidenced…

Game over. Thanks for the friendly argument, Imp.

Kind regards,
Michael

anytime. but next time stick to the original argument and quit bringing up straw men.

-Imp

[Polemarchus]

Still pushing your pawns around after the game is over.

You’re a riot, Imp.

[Impenitent]

yes, the game ended when you stopped arguing the original point

-Imp

[GliderPendalehaven]

----leading cause of death in america (and every were else, but that’s not important) is life-----

and it has an easy fix a court order to kill everyone with bullets (we use guns to shoot them)

this way noone dies of cancer, yay

saddly the death through gun violence goes up, but no one is around to care