Cats vs. Dogs

Point 1) Women are “cats”.

“Mwwweeeeoooooowww!!!”

Let’s not fool ourselves; women are cats. They are domesticated, yet independent. They are cute, yet clawed. They are horny, yet prude.

Why do cats make such good pets (for women)???

It’s not too hard to see – women desire to be like cats. Women actually envy their feline nature! Because this is the case, cats make the absolute best pet (in general) for women. Women and cats … just have a mutual understanding with one another! And this is why they have such good relationships. Women understand, completely, the nature of felines. Therefore, to women, cats make the best pets! (I already know there are exceptions to the rule, but like always, the exceptions themselves do not change the rule – they simply add to its objective validity.)

Here are some things to know about cats. #1 - They fuck around when nobody’s watching. Given the chance, cats open to sexual reproduction do so in a way similar to rabbits. They fuck & bred like demon-possessed little creatures! This is why they must be spayed & neutered (similar to why humans must also be spayed & neutered). However, “cat-fucking” (as I shall be calling it) happens “in the dark”, “behind your back”. This means that you often won’t actually witness cat-fucking, because they do it in the dark (with the lights turned out). The reason for this “deception” (if it’s seen this way) is that the actual appearance of innocence is vital to cats/kittens. If they are seen for what they are, rather vile, then they lose their “cute”, “cuddly”, “charm”. They’re actually little fucking whores!!!

:evilfun: :laughing:

However, like with all things, the goods balance out the bads, otherwise the creature in question dies-off. Let’s get back to some more things about cats though … #2 - They are cute. Let’s give them that; nothing can melt a heart like a young, fuzzy, warm, kitten. They’re so vibrant, innocent, and playful – exactly the way men desire their women to be! It’s no wonder why cats love women, wait, I mean why women love cats. 8-[ #3 - They clean-up after themselves. How great is this? How wonderfully domesticated is this? What other pet is so perfect as to come in a clean-up package? Throw some sand in a box and a cat will instinctively shit in it! That’s wonderful! #4 - Cats don’t require much, well, except for attention!!! And this one is annoying – to guys! Guys don’t like giving attention; we just don’t (unless we’re physically desperate). The only men who like to give attention to cats (or females in general) are D-O-M-E-S-T-I-C-A-T-E-D. That’s right – if men had our own way, then we would use the female as an object and be done with her until next use (cough sex, with unintended consequences cough food, make me a 'sammich cough comfort, massage my gentials cough). Alright, alright, time to move on…

If women are cats, then what are men? :-s Hmmm… :-k

Point 2) Men are “dogs”.

“Woof woof woof woof!!!”

Let’s not fool ourselves; men are dogs. They are free, yet leashed. They are ugly, yet loved. They are sexual, yet directed.

[b]Why do dogs make such good pets (for men)???[/b]

It’s not too hard to see – men desire to be [b]like[/b] dogs. Men actually envy their [b]canine[/b] nature! Because this is the case, dogs make the absolute best pet (in general) for men. Men and dogs … just have a mutual understanding with one another! And this is why they have such good relationships. Men understand, [b]completely[/b], the nature of canines. Therefore, to men, dogs make the best pets! (I already know there are exceptions to the rule, but like always, the exceptions themselves do not change the rule – they simply add to its objective validity.)

Here are some things to know about dogs. #1 - They fuck around when everybody’s watching. Given the chance, dogs open to sexual reproduction do so in a way similar to rabbits. They fuck & bred like demon-possessed large creatures! This is why they must be spayed & neutered (similar to why humans must also be spayed & neutered). However, “dog-fucking” (as I shall be calling it) happens “in the daylight”, “in front of your face”. This means that you often will actually [b]witness dog-fucking[/b], because they do it in the daylight (with the lights turned on). The reason for this “obviousness” (if it’s seen this way) is that the actual appearance of vulgarity is vital to dogs/puppies. If they are seen for what they are, rather base, then they lose their “strong”, “proud”, “charm”. [b]They’re actually large fucking monsters!!![/b]

:evilfun: :laughing:

However, like with all things, the goods balance out the bads, otherwise the creature in question dies-off. Let’s get back to some more things about dogs though … #2 - They are loyal. Let’s give them that; nothing can melt a heart like a patient, obedient, waiting, puppy. They’re so vibrant, innocent, and playful – [b]exactly the way women desire their men to be![/b] It’s no wonder why dogs love men, wait, I mean why men love dogs. 8-[ #3 - They make a mess of themselves. How horrible is this? How wonderfully [b]undomesticated[/b] is this? What other pet is so perfect as to come in a mess-up package? Do your best to clean your rug and a dog will [b]instinctively[/b] shit on it! That’s wonderful! #4 - Dogs don’t require much, well, [b]except for respect!!![/b] And this one is annoying – [b]to girls![/b] Girls don’t like giving respect; they just don’t (unless they’re physically desperate). The only women who like to give respect to dogs (or men in general) are U-N-D-O-M-E-S-T-I-C-A-T-E-D. That’s right – if women had their own way, then they would use the male as a subject and be done with him until next use (cough seminal impregnation, with intended consequences cough food, bring me a turkey 'sammich cough comfort, massage my feet cough).

Conclusion: Women are “cats”. Men are “dogs”.

Is it truly difficult to see why this predominant analogy is so powerful? It may difficult to see for retards & imbeciles, but to the fine geniuses of ILP, it won’t be difficult to observe at all. Women are “cats”, because they are feminine. Men are “dogs”, because they are masculine. By domesticating both of these creatures, humanity has attempted to “humanize” the traits of cats & dogs. Cats are adored, because they represent the female human animal. Dogs are adored, because they represent the male human animal. Who reinforces these metaphors? Everybody and nobody do. Everybody does, because people create a false interpretation of theirselves. Nobody does, because the interpretation is actually false. Cats are cats. Dogs are dogs. Then again, everybody knew what I meant by posting this post (unless you’re stupid).

Satyr’s description of the human animal is an accurate one. It is the most truthful philosophy on this website and everybody speaking about other “philosophical” issues are merely derivatives of the separation of what it means to be “human”. And what does it mean, to be “human”? What does it mean to be a social, human, animal? Does anybody know? Or, shall we engage in some more mental-masterbation about so-and-so’s thoughts on rap music or how drug use affects institutional grade-point averages???

What does it mean to be a “woman”? What does it mean to be a “man”?

What does it mean to be a “cat”? What does it mean to be a “dog”?

RU, you just like to stir things up a little now and then, don’tcha? :wink:

i think RU is the worlds best internet troll.

10/10 would read again

Honestly, it’s pretty hard for me to fake this stuff. I’m either really bad or really good – either way I can’t tell.

All this stuff you’re doing is pseudoscience. You state racist claims with a kind of structure that at first glance warrants the creedence of scientific evidence, but it’s just not scientific. It’s a systemization of your opinions. It is not philosophy, it’s not even sociology, it’s not even bad sociology. You’re the biggest emotivist here.

Since you seemed to have learned all the wrong lessons from Satyr, I am not sure that is the angle you want to be arguing.

Felines are independent creatures – even when we make them dependent they resent the crap out of it. Dogs, on the other hand, are slaves. Anybody can make a dog love them. And that is without effort!

I’d reconsider that position. Within the context of the “feminization” paradigm, cats represent the masculine and dogs represent the feminine. Now, if you want to reject that paradigm, we can talk, but within it I think you’ll have a rough time . . .

Men are attracted to independent women, not clingy ones.

Women are attracted to loyal men who beg at their feet, not ones who ignore them.

The role reversals work perfectly, which is why women see themselves as cats and men see themselves as dogs.

I agree.

have you interviewed every woman or man?

do you have any empirical evidence to support this assumption?

sorry just my healthy skepticism kicking in :smiley:

One of the most disgusting things in my life I saw less than a week ago:

A very beautiful man & wife were walking along, both of the children holding the hands of the father and the mother walking ahead of the pack independently. She was going to go and talk to somebody or something, so she leaves the kids with the father. He stands around and does his fatherly things … completely clueless as to how whipped he is. The woman is off being independent. The guy is duped.

That is not ever going to happen to me. I would be dead first before being relegated to watching over the kids. That’s the “woman’s job”, not the man’s job. If I pursue a new girlfriend, then there’s no way in hell I’m going to ever be “holding her bag”. If she hands it to me I’m going to drop-kick it.

Women need to be put back into their places.

RU, are you sure the father is clueless? Have you ever spent any time with kids? If not, then maybe you don’t know how amazing children are. You might be surprised, if and when you do have children, how much you enjoy being with them and playing with them. They are honest, earnest, and everything is new to them. If anything, that father was probably totally in love with his children and not “duped” at all.

I’m ignoring all of the sexist comments - I know better than to try to go there with you. Hopeless. :unamused:

This has got to be the most erroneous statement on the subject I have ever come across.

Attracted to and rationally desiring of, are two different things.

You have a lot to learn if you think women are attracted to groveling weaklings. They want them rationally and practically but this does not make them attracted to them.

They actually find such males disgusting and are never sexually satisfied by them.

In their youth, when the instinct has a more complete dominance over their choices, the bad-boy with his indifference towards them as individuals is what they find attractive.

It is only after life has forced a need for compromises that they opt for the male you describe, which is manageable, reliable and totally controlled.

As for males, they do not like the “clingy” ones as you call them, but neither the totally independent ones.
A man is not attracted by a woman who has more money than him or that is bigger and stronger than him.

Time to smell the coffee.

That’s why men love dogs. Dogs are loyal, disciplined and totally controlled by them.

I guess you it was a “you had to be there” kind of thing. I should have went and put a leash around his head to teach him a lesson.

Now you have no hope in me too? Thanks a lot!!!.. :evilfun:

You should write some laws together to put me away into prison just by typing a few sentences … something to think about.

I have trouble telling apart female rationality from actuality.

In the end, people are attracted to whomever they successfully bear children with and that’s the bottom line!

I still have hope for you, RU, just no hope that I’ll be able to talk you out of your totally incorrect, absurd, unsubstantiated views on women. That’s all. :wink:

You and I have had our go-around. Perhaps you just threw in the towel too quickly… :-s

It is easier to train a dog than it is to train a cat.
If men represent dogs, then it would mean that men are also more easily brainwashed then women.

Oh yeah, for some reason, dogs also like to eat shit. Go figure.

Would you like fries with that?

(Women brainwash men very easily by the way.)

Is that supposed to be a counterargument?

I showed you the logical inconsistencies of your analogy of men and women. Why don’t you defend your analogy; or was it not even supposed to be an argument to begin with?

What is the purpose of your thread?

…train them at what? How do you qualify “easier” training?

I agree that it is “easier” to train a dog than a cat in general.

That’s a good analogy, but like I said, a dog & cat are both easy to “brainwash” if you know how to do it.

Here’s your logical argument for you.