How about no threads or posts about gender or sex. Can it be done? Surely minds can get past this to the many other important subjects. Gender seperation has validity in very few ways. How about it? No more gender specific threads?
A lot of men here certainly have issues with women. Apparently it is such a big issue that it finds itself in nearly everything they say. A topic about something philosophical all of a sudden provides an opportunity to point out how inferior females are. I don’t know why it became so central to so many guys here, but I consider it weak minded. The best philosophy is the one that transcends whatever valuation of gender that anyone has, its a philosophy for all people, essentially.
Philosophy does not equal human nature. I stated The best philosophy is one that “transcends whatever valuation of gender that anyone has”…
Now that means it shouldn’t be for gender specific, it doesn’t need to be a focus either. Philosophy that engages everyone, that makes everyone “better”, is better than one that makes only one sex “better”, which really could mean it is making them inferior by thinking poorly.
The problem is neither philosophical nor even complex. It is nothing but the frustration of those men who are not getting laid, nothing else whatsoever. Simple as that.
In other words, the grapes are sour, just because they are beyond the reach.
In the philosophical postulations or analysis of civilization and society the inherent differences along with the conflict between the different sexes is going to come out. Of course politically correct individuals like yourself would rather dismiss it all and kiss the asses of women instead.
I would argue that any philosophy that has discussions where human nature is taken out is one that revolves around stupidity. Spare me these transcending nature idealizations.
So, philosophy should be about equality for everybody?
Again, philosophy does not equal human nature, so obviously human nature is beyond “male nature” or “Female nature” or homosexual nature, or white nature, or black nature, or any other myopic subset of humans
Obviously philosophy should not be about equality for everybody, its ridiculous that you think that anything I said here implies that.
It is very hard, as hard as it can disturb the whole mental balance of effected male, as we see in many male posters here. It is a natural physical and mental requirement of all the grown-up males. And, when this does not happen, some unwarranted consequences are bound to happen.
Because of some biological and psychological reasons, women can survive this shortcoming relatively easily. They can cope up with the lack of sex, but men cannot.
I never said there wasn’t far more differences, did I?
No, it’s beyond just mere personal issues and of course personal issues could be extrapolated as having environmental causes outside of the individual themselves.
Alright, well if philosophy is not about the totality of equality then there should be nothing terrible in discussing the inequality of the sexes. Inequality being a huge facet of human existence.
No, human nature comprises all of those things and isn’t beyond them whatsoever.
Difference does not entail conflict, if you can understand that.
Secondly, I would be last person on the earth who wants to be politically correct regarding anything.
Lastly, litetally speaking, i do not have any problem whatsoever in kissing a woman’s ass (cheeks), or I rather enjoy and do that ragularly, besides many other things, but only with that woman with whom I am entitled to do such things. She likes and appriciates all that too, thus servers the purpose for both of us.
a challenge is not censorship. If you must think about sex all the time then clearly you are not qualified for the challenge. It is not just males doing it is the females as well that do this or or make replies. How about it? You think you can get past sex?
True, but there can be differences between the same gender (men) too. Like between Bush and Saddam, Obama and Putin, US and Europe vs ISIS. There is no role of women whatsoever in these conflicts.
How are you going to address those differences and thus derived clashes between the males? By spanking or some other kind of dominant gay sex?
HHH,
You people need to come out from your this useless women bashing. It is blinding your intellect as you cannot see or think of anything else. It is not philosophy by any stretch of imagination.
Others will hesitate in saying this, but I would not that, at a philodophy forum, you and some likewise other male posters too are seen as a bunch of fools by most of the other members. That is only why they never engage with you people.
Do not confuse it with the victory of your mindset. No one from you, I repeat, no one from you can ever win an argument, but others consider engaging with you people as a waste of time and energy. That is only why they avoid replying.
And I think you can’t handle this simple challenge, you are complaining way too much and pulling crap out of the air like celibacy. Dude don’t worry if you can’t, you can’t . Sometimes addictions are way too hard to put aside.
a challenge is not censorship. If you must think about sex all the time then clearly you are not qualified for the challenge. It is not just males doing it is the females as well that do this or or make replies. How about it? You think you can get past sex?