Quite clearly, China contributes massively to world pollution because they are selfish cunts…should the world collectively team up and destroy china before it’s too late…
No, China is saving the environment.
You mean by them killing themselves?
No, by putting carbon in the air so plants can breathe.
Only reason why not is they stole the prototypes of the F23. Traitors in America did it for peace, and I guess peace is what they got. Peace is not inherently good. If some blabbering, stupid gorilla is trying to bite my leg off, I should not make peace with it.
so what did plants do before the industrial revolution?
They grew in environments full of carbon dioxide producing animals.
Now that we have psuedo-enviromentalist megacities like the San Francisco Bay Area polluting the fuck out of the sea, sucking up dustant water resources, and butchering the Amazon, we need to make it as easy as possible for plants elsewhere, untouched by liberals, to survive.
Hard to do if all liberals want to do is suck carbon out of the atmosphere without considering long term reprocussions. We all can’t live in the UK, that imports trees to burn in it’s power plants, because wood is considered renewable.
We need to he very careful and protect our carbon reserves. First step on the road to protecting plant life, which were dependant upon for survival.
But let me remind you the most environment-friendly state in the world is Cuba. By Carbon emissions per person, America is the one of the biggest polluters in the whole world. (America is 17.5, China is 7)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_dioxide_emissions_per_capita
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rreBKDko6OY[/youtube]
Let me also remind you that many pollutions, especially air pollution in China is caused by some American companies relocated to China. China attracts so many foreign investors because its environment protection law is the most lax comparing with Europe and America.
Both China and America still have a long walk ahead.
So what your saying is, that the world should come together and mass attack manni, instead of China?
No, I 'm just presenting a bigger picture to Manni
I don’t know whether China has stolen the prototype or not, but one thing I can be sure, the pentagon as well as China’s defense department need to regularly release such information (whether it is fake or not) to justify their own agenda (spread fear to increasing military budge, etc.)
China has its own brilliant engineers and scientists with its own research facility and capacity, it can develop its own fighters and battleships, we don’t need to blame China every time for stealing the technology from us whenever we saw a new high-tech weapon in China.
Here is another high-tech thing China owns, maybe it is also stolen from US?
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SRV3rnULO0[/youtube]
They stole that from Cuba. That’s the Golden Eye.
thanks, I want to watch this filmhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GoldenEye!
What do you mean by “bite my leg off”? could you give me an example? Thanks!
Please don’t Trixie. Please.
Well, Trixie, if peace is not inherently good, then why not have another US-China war? I 'm tired of all those warmongering speeches in US and in China over the years. Pushing for US-China war seems to become the new political correctness in those two countries. And people seemed to truly believe in it as if they have all be brainwashed by this new politically correct warmongering.
Near the end of that film John Pilger asks Stephen Starr, a senior scientist studying nuclear proliferation one question:
John Pilger: in one nuclear exchange between US and China, what will be the consequences?
Stephen Starr : Well, let me give you just one example of what one Chinese four or five-megaton warhead could do to a US city if we got it through: The detonation of that weapon over a city would instantly ignite about 600 or 700 square miles on fire. Then, within 20 to 30 minutes all of those fires would coalesce into a single gigantic firestorm, there would be no escape from it so all the people there would perish. So, the US, with say hundreds of nuclear weapons on Chinese cities, well, when you combine all the smoke from these nuclear weapons detonating, it actually creates millions of tons of smoke, (cold laughter), black carbon smoke, that will rise above cloud level into the stratosphere, where it is heated by the sun so it acts like a solar collector and that smoke because of that will stay there for ten years or longer. The smoke blocks warm sunlight from reaching the earth’s surface, and it becomes so cold in a couple of weeks that the temperatures will fall below freezing every day for one to three years, and it will become too cold to grow food crops for at least ten years or longer…
^^ He who doesn’t live by the sword, gets their face eaten off by lions.
They grew in environments full of carbon dioxide producing animals.
Now that we have psuedo-enviromentalist megacities like the San Francisco Bay Area polluting the fuck out of the sea, sucking up dustant water resources, and butchering the Amazon, we need to make it as easy as possible for plants elsewhere, untouched by liberals, to survive.
Hard to do if all liberals want to do is suck carbon out of the atmosphere without considering long term reprocussions. We all can’t live in the UK, that imports trees to burn in it’s power plants, because wood is considered renewable.
We need to he very careful and protect our carbon reserves. First step on the road to protecting plant life, which were dependant upon for survival.
there are 7 billion humans breathing out carbon dioxide though, and no shortage of carbon atm, hence global warming. I take your point of the trees though.
Well, Trixie, if peace is not inherently good, then why not have another US-China war? I 'm tired of all those warmongering speeches in US and in China over the years. Pushing for US-China war seems to become the new political correctness in those two countries. And people seemed to truly believe in it as if they have all be brainwashed by this new politically correct warmongering.
The problem is that we cannot have a nuclear war. That is boring.
There is no sport in it.
The problem is that we cannot have a nuclear war. That is boring.
There is no sport in it.
The war will be anything but boring:
If a regular war between America and China break out, who can be sure the war will not escalate into a nuclear war? During the world war 2 America did use the nuclear weapon.