I’m curious: How many more or less trust Chomsky? How many don’t? How many know of him, but haven’t really read his stuff?
It’s my opinion that he is a Zionist agent.
I’m curious: How many more or less trust Chomsky? How many don’t? How many know of him, but haven’t really read his stuff?
It’s my opinion that he is a Zionist agent.
I read quite a bit of Chomsky years ago, when he was in a lot of journals, including political ones. He may still be. I agree, in the main, with the quotes you have posted.
I used to kill his books back in the day. They open you to a world… but then he tries to close the door.
I know of Chomsky. I can’t read him because what he writes is to thick for me to understand. I like what Arthur Schlesinger said about him.
Nevertheless, here is an interesting interview with him: youtube.com/watch?v=fOIM1_xOSro
He was inspired as a scientist. But he’s good evidence of why we shouldn’t be swayed by the opinions of actors, singers or other celebreties on social issues.
Chomsky … “If we choose, we can live in a world of comforting illusion,” ; “Or we can look at recent history, at the institutional structures that remain essentially unchanged, at the plans that are being announced – and answer the questions accordingly. I know of no reason to suppose that there has been a sudden change in long-standing motivations or policy goals, apart from tactical adjustments to changing circumstances.”
Gatekeepers are the zionists in hegemony.
Chomsky is so beset with impressing his readership of the the moral depravity of America and its foreign policy that he disingenuously portrays the facts to overstate the case. An instance of this is found in his book “9-11”, published in the wake of 9/11. His purpose is to convince the reader that America too is a terrorist state. As evidence for this he offers the bombing of the pharmaceutical plant in Sudan, in August 1998, and points out that it resulted in thousands of children dying as a result of being deprived of medicine. He leaves it to the reader to conclude that the bombing was morally equivalent to bombing of the towers.
What Chomsky pays no attention to what the Clinton administration thought it was doing when it launched the missiles. Did it comtemplate depriving thousands of children of medicine? Of course not. The pharmaceutical plant was mistaken as an Al Qaeda chemical weapons factory. The purpose of the bombing removes it from the unspeakable moral depravity of the 9/11 bombing. Does Chomsky believe many readers will not catch on to his slight of hand? It’s far too obvious.