Chronicalling McCain(and Palin)

argument?

what argument?

obama is a socialist- he detests the free market

britan is socialist and you enjoy state mandated misery

britan hasn’t fallen under a socialist revolution because your economy is becoming freer (remember thatcher?) not more controlled by government tyrants…

britan’s economy has been growing since thatcher because she got governmental control out of the picture…

the obamamessiah and the liberal democrats want to go the opposite way and control the american economy and do away with private business…

armageddon? no… civil war over freedom from government tyranny definitely…

-Imp

Mortgage Crisis:
Cause - deregulation(free market)
Rep. Solution - government bailout(socialism :unamused: )

Oil crisis:
Cause - deregulation resulting in speculators(free market)
Rep. Solution - government intervention(socialism :unamused: )

Telecommunications crisis:
Cause - deregulation
result - two largest companies merging to destroy any semblance of a free market
Solution - ???

What you have yet to realize is that government regulations are required, not build a socialism, but to save capitalism. :unamused:

Personally I think we ought to let the mortgage companies fail and then burn all their records, which could help solve the energy crunch for one city. Then commnicate using telegraph just to mess with the FBI and plan a coup on all Chevron and Exxon gas stations and their plants. Then we make a grab for all the Churches because most are well built and can be defended. And we line up all the little IRS agents, politicians and petty beureaucrats we can find in front of the churches and that gas stations for even better defense I think crosses ought to hold them nicely. Then we tell all our kids in the military to come home pronto, we have a new game in town.

wrong. government regulations stop the free market.

but the revolution is close

-Imp

LOL
wrong, one sentence line, and an industry completely full of idiots
wrong, one sentence line, and drilling drilling drilling, despite the best evidence(from the Bush gov. mind you) saying it won’t do a damn thing.
wrong one sentence line…
LOL

Worthless.

I’ve already had the oil/drilling discussion with you, but you are apparently quite immune to facts, evidence, and data. So for everyone else:
eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/otheranalysis/ongr.html

youtube.com/watch?v=llZuoMXpr4s

Family values mantra - says he doesn’t want gay adoption even if a child will have no other home.

McCain says his wife ought to be in the Buffalo chip pageant
youtube.com/watch?v=N4X6XqNeF1o

Clip of Buffalo Chip Pageant:

*******WARNING********NSFW
youtube.com/watch?v=eVQHJd_3J7g

Olbermann clip
youtube.com/watch?v=skElJ8LF-Sc

McCain horribly misspeaks at sturgis - Obama’s response to McCain mocking his suggestion about tire pressure - and McCain giving a speach on Nuclear energy and it’s safety, ironically at a Nuclear power plant that partially melted down.

Tire pressure and fuel economy
nhtsa.dot.gov/staticfiles/DO … alrule.pdf

Blah blah blah data about number of underinflated tires and amount of under inflation = hundreds of thousands of barrels of oil saved a day.

Right, whatever happened to your philosophical acumen? Never be content to rest at the most proximate cause. Now, lets do this slowly, why did they extend loans to those who couldn’t pay them? Because your beloved free market has allowed them to do so i.e. because of deregulation. It is a weakness of the free, deregulated, market that this can happen.

I’ve got no major axe to grind with capitalism. I agree with Kurt Vonnegut: capitalism is what the people with all the money decide to do today. Sometimes the people with all the money are smart. Sometimes the people with all the money are stupid. I think its the governments role to stop them being too stupid. Hence, regulation.

Imp, my point, which you don’t seem to be able to get through your party-dominated skull, is that we do not live in a political world where we choose between true-blue (is blue associated with conservatism in the US?) conservatism and true-red socialism. Few western countries field candidates with recognisably socialist policies - my point was that our British Labour is NOT a socialist party, and it is silly to call it so, but if you want to do so then lets see what a ‘socialist party’ has produced: all sorts of wonderful growth for the last 10 years, which is now falling apart because the world economy is falling apart. Obama, similarly, is not a socialist. Everyone is an economic neo-liberal now.

Can you actually articulate in what sense Obama is a proper socialist? Socialists don’t just believe in regulation of the free market. Socialists don’t just believe in restricting off-shore drilling of oil. Socialists believe in wealth-redistribution on a grand scale (is Obama even pledging to raise taxes on the rich?), socialists believe in completely free health care (and I mean completely), socialists believe that people should have equality in actuality, as opposed to the modern ideal of ‘equality of opportunity’.

Imp - you probably won’t answer this one. This is something I will never, ever, understand. You claim to love economic freedom. You don’t want tyranny. Yet you vote for a party that is frighteningly socially authoritarian. Why does only economic freedom (and the freedom to own your gun) matter to you? Don’t other freedoms matter too?
As someone with sympathies for old-fashioned liberalism (laissez-faire economics and social permissiveness it makes no sense to me.

“Britain is socialist”

  • to such idiotic comments I can only respond with “you have absolutely no grasp of the meaning of the word in that sentence”.

Right, whatever happened to your philosophical acumen? Never be content to rest at the most proximate cause. Now, lets do this slowly, why did they extend loans to those who couldn’t pay them? Because your beloved free market has allowed them to do so i.e. because of deregulation. It is a weakness of the free, deregulated, market that this can happen.

I’ve got no major axe to grind with capitalism. I agree with Kurt Vonnegut: capitalism is what the people with all the money decide to do today. Sometimes the people with all the money are smart. Sometimes the people with all the money are stupid. I think its the governments role to stop them being too stupid. Hence, regulation.

Imp, my point, which you don’t seem to be able to get through your party-dominated skull, is that we do not live in a political world where we choose between true-blue (is blue associated with conservatism in the US?) conservatism and true-red socialism. Few western countries field candidates with recognisably socialist policies - my point was that our British Labour is NOT a socialist party, and it is silly to call it so, but if you want to do so then lets see what a ‘socialist party’ has produced: all sorts of wonderful growth for the last 10 years, which is now falling apart because the world economy is falling apart. Obama, similarly, is not a socialist. Everyone is an economic neo-liberal now.

Can you actually articulate in what sense Obama is a proper socialist? Socialists don’t just believe in regulation of the free market. Socialists don’t just believe in restricting off-shore drilling of oil. Socialists believe in wealth-redistribution on a grand scale (is Obama even pledging to raise taxes on the rich?), socialists believe in completely free health care (and I mean completely), socialists believe that people should have equality in actuality, as opposed to the modern ideal of ‘equality of opportunity’.

Imp - you probably won’t answer this one. This is something I will never, ever, understand. You claim to love economic freedom. You don’t want tyranny. Yet you vote for a party that is frighteningly socially authoritarian. Why does only economic freedom (and the freedom to own your gun) matter to you? Don’t other freedoms matter too?
As someone with sympathies for old-fashioned liberalism (laissez-faire economics and social permissiveness it makes no sense to me.

“Britain is socialist”

  • to such idiotic comments I can only respond with “you have absolutely no grasp of the meaning of the word in that sentence”.

idiotic until you understand the context.

-Imp

[size=200]OBAMA '08[/size]
Blow it out your tire gauge

-Imp

I rather like the recent Paris Hilton comercial for herself as president. the girl actually sounded intelligent. I think someone had to write it for her though, she probably got through the University on her back and on Daddy’s money.

Kriswest:I rather like the recent Paris Hilton comercial for herself as president. the girl actually sounded intelligent. I think someone had to write it for her though, she probably got through the University on her back and on Daddy’s money."

K: WOW. Who knew she got through college the same way George Bush did!

Kropotkin

I don’t quite understand how anyone could think that the free market has any validity in today’s world. If we pursued free market in this country, then the bail-outs of the financial institutions that let greed govern their lending practices wouldn’t be happening. Sure, let them go under. That would precipitate the collapse of the world economy. There is a teensy bit of difference between anarchy and chaos. Regulation, taxes, and the whole governmental ball of wax is an integral part of the world economy. To think differently is day dreaming. Liberal - conservative… who gives a crap? The only thing that matters is an equitable distribution of wealth, so pick your partner and live with it. All the name calling is just a diversion from looking at the issues we face daily.

:laughing: :laughing: I kind of think that is how most bluebloods do it. Bush and Hilton are probably related anyway. :laughing:

tentative:I don’t quite understand how anyone could think that the free market has any validity in today’s world. If we pursued free market in this country, then the bail-outs of the financial institutions that let greed govern their lending practices wouldn’t be happening. Sure, let them go under. That would precipitate the collapse of the world economy. There is a teensy bit of difference between anarchy and chaos. Regulation, taxes, and the whole governmental ball of wax is an integral part of the world economy. To think differently is day dreaming. Liberal - conservative… who gives a crap? The only thing that matters is an equitable distribution of wealth, so pick your partner and live with it. All the name calling is just a diversion from looking at the issues we face daily."

K: The one fact that is forgotten is the U.S tried free and unfettered free market and 30 years and than we completely rejected it. From 1870 to 1900 or so,
we had a free and unfettered market. It was clearly a disaster for Americans otherwise they would have kept it. This love of a free market is by people
who haven’t studied history in any way, shape or form. This mixed economy we have is the same one just about every country on earth has and there
is a reason for that. And equitable distribution of wealth is a great idea. In the United States, states with a higher income inequality have
a host of far greater issues including lower life expectancy, higher infant mortality rate and higher homicide rates vs states with a lower income inequality.
This is also shown in countries with lower income inequality vs higher inequality. The way to explore this is the gini co-effcoefficient which is in wikipedia.

Kropotkin

double post.

K

You have to understand that there are two basic and unspoken assumptions about the free-market being employed here. One is that the free market lives and dies by it’s utility to society, and it ought to be protected or disassemble in accordance with it’s waxing and waning utility. I generally think people that hold this assumption see American commerce as dominated by a select few companies and a select few individuals, it is parasitic on the individual. It has come to dominate every facet of society, from the culture of consumerism to the circus of lobbyists and campaign finance. For the sake of freedom and rational policy, this assumption demands regulation of the commercial giants.

On the other hand you have the assumption that the free-market is indicative of a larger ontological order of might makes right, thus making it a self-justifying reflection of the natural order of things. This assumption disregards all utility of the market place, and views any regulation or argument against the free market as an assault on nature and existence - as a denial of what is, and ought to be. Naturally, this assumption views itself as realist, and thus doesn’t realize that it is an idealism. Hence, for this assumption, any attack on the free market is an idealism trying to overturn the actual.
Here’s where you get name calling and type casting whenever regulation is advocated, because for this assumption, regulation is not a matter of social utility or rational policy. Economics has nothing to do with such things. Regulation is a denial of the self-justifying trial-by-fire human relationship that reflects a larger ontological order. It is a denial of what is real.

McCain’s tire rotation:
After weeks of mocking Obama about his idea to inflate tires, McCain agrees with him.

blogs.reuters.com/trail08/2008/0 … ure-debate

Anyone who is a car person understands that maintainence gives better gas mileage. mcCain probably does not know crap about cars and probably niether does Obama, Obama’s people just got him the information first then mcCains people had to play hell trying to figure out the truth. I doubt anyone in either party understands the exact whys of maintainence. Cut all the idiots some slack here, their hobbies include only storytelling, fleecing and collecting expensive toys that people give them. :laughing:

Like George W. Bush, McCain got his first career breaks from the connections and money of his family.
Because his father and grandfather were admirals, he was admitted to Annapolis. There he did poorly scoring fifth from the bottom of his class. Nevertheless, the Navy commissioned him as a pilot. He crashed three planes before he failed to evade the North Vietnamese missile that destroyed his plane and landed him in a prison camp for more than five years.
After his release, McCain was lauded as a hero. But he knew his weak military record meant he’d never make admiral, so he went into politics.