No… I tend to think that it is plausible that maybe the determined reality that is progresses in the best possible manner despite that it seems harsh nonetheless…that which happened it is good did not happen… But maybe not… either way surely what will now result will result in different things… and it will be interesting to see what…
Perhaps that which relies more on its body then its exterior creations is better off in that it does not allow its abilities to atrophie and does not require fail-likely complex mechanisms to support itself…
That is not to say we’re less creative, less imaginative, on the contrary, because of civilization, and because we had to adapt to a more cold, harsh, hostile and unforgiving climate, we had to be more socially and naturally inventive, we had to be socially and naturally progressive to survive. Ultimately, this lead to the development of civilization, we realized we didn’t have to stop inventing, even though and just because we were fairly comfortable, we could keep on inventing. I think they’re better at being inventive on the spot, more inventive in their execution. However, in the main, I’d say they’re more socially and naturally conservative. Improvisation is not necessarily the same thing as being imaginative, creative and progressive.
I don’t know that we are better at living up to them…
But this makes me think of how a people that stays in the natural habitat is less likely to have to evolve such as to develop means of living…
So he who leaves the box must learn to survive outside…
I wonder how many civilizations have gotten this far and then nuked themselves…
There is a lot of room for shit to get fucked up…but maybe that is always the case…
Man made viruses…
Atrophieing immune systems due to to cushoned life styles…