Complete Reality

Complete Reality School of Taoism

Prologue

This posting, however long, should still be viewed by the reader as a transient exposition of the intended subject matter, not a complete rendering of possible information. To do so in totality would require far more historical expertise than contained within the author’s knowledge base, and mortality is finite, with respect to time.

The reasoning for this post is simple. There are individuals whose misunderstanding of the subject matter lends them to a mindset that Taoism is comprised only of superfluously ornate and extravagant language, to coddle a student or practitioner into a less than serious philosophical view point of the world and Tao. Add to this the oft heard pretensions of Taoism being based upon majiks and illogical mysticism, and the final assessment becomes ubiquitously negative. Correct information may help to curtail this, or not.

For those who wish to take issue with historical information contained herein, I have neither the interest nor the time, to spend in rebuttal or debate. Academics even to this day continually bicker and moan over authenticities of historicity, to no avail. The pursuit of such would last a lifetime’s lifetime, with still only a muddled outcome.

Throughout, the attempt will be made to maintain as much simplicity of language as the subject matter lends itself to, although not always possible. The Chinese names are as they are, and due to the inherent differences of translations, Pinyin or Wade-Gilles may fall over one another. The lack of consistency rests with the author of the post, not noted informational texts or internets links.

“When the home is empty and peaceful, the spirit naturally resides there.”

Historical Perspective

The precursory information given here, is to simply set the stage, and is more a matter of folklore, concerning the entire great nation of the Chinese people, and not likely common knowledge to most of those of the Western traditions, nations, and educations.

The following will show that the fundamental roots of Taoism, sometimes referred to as “church” or “religious” Taoism are firmly entrenched in the shamanism of the nomadic settlers, before the greatness of the Chinese was solidified into a nation. The forefathers of China are said to be the Three August Ones; Fu Xi (original founder and credited with the first “signs”, technically the trigrams, of the yijing, commonly, The Book of Changes), Shennong (first teacher of agriculture and horticulture), Huang Di (first leader, given to ignorance, and discovering enlightenment through internal self-cultivation and education). Of these, only Huang Di is of particular concern to this writing, for his instrumentality to Taoism, as it has often been called by his name, the Yellow Emperor. To him is attributed what some academic historians claim to be the first literary writing of Taoism, the Yin Convergence Classic, which details the spirituality of strategic living, especially as concerns the internal benefits to health and longevity.

To illuminate the complexities of both Taoism and it’s history, proper mention must be given, generally, to the fusion of Taoism, Confucianism, and Buddhism, (most particularly Pure Land and Chan Buddhism, as being more assuredly Chinese forms, Chan being the predecessor, academically accepted, of Zen Buddhism). How these three survived the many dynasties, emperors, warring factions, social and civil decay and rebirth, is a dynamic of many volumes. Each one was accordingly saved by one or both of the others, at some point historically, and with each defense, the infusion furthered, and even academics agree, to the benefit of all three systems.

Complete Reality School owes Chan Buddhism for its alchemical understanding of the inner workings of the human body and energy, as from the classic Flower Ornament Scripture. It also owes a debt to the Confucian system, for detailed outlines on individual character, and effects upon society. Although the legalism of Confucianism is also academically accepted as a benefit to Taoism, I particularly disagree with said item, as it is concerned with the lower order, matters of social/civil/governmental acceptance/adherence, and the practicality of concerning oneself with matters of society, over matters of cultivation. (It is worth mentioning that the two greatest teachers of Confucianism, Confucius and Mencius, are considered part of the Taoist lineage. Confucius is absorbed for his alleged meeting, and four written references to, Li Er, commonly known as Lao Tzu. Confucian writings do not, in my opinion, reflect Taoist traditional belief, although the influence on Mencius is palpable in his writings).

Although I am still searching, I have not yet been able to trace a direct lineage from the earlier teachers, to the ones that lead to the founding of the Complete Reality School. From the Tang dynasty it falls from Zhangli Quan > Lu Yan > Liu Cao > Zhang Boduan.

Zhang Boduan is the center of my interest, and particularly because of his authored discernment with regards to Taoist esoteric practices, metaphorical meaning, and the aberrations he considered failings with most sects or schools, including the aspect of “secret knowledge”.

Zhang Boduan, founder of the Southern Complete Reality School, is the author of Understanding Reality, which in my readings, is the most succinct and pure of Taoist teachings, and strips away the unnecessary metaphysical baggage, applied mostly from the infusion with Buddhism, from my perspective.

Language

I would like to look at Taoist language through the thoughts and words of this particular Taoist master, along with the corresponding dissemination of information regarding paths and techniques.

Alchemy. Put away your magician’s hat, and cast off the images of the White Witch, we aren’t venturing to Salem or a castle. Alchemy is a matter of the physiological and biochemical processes of the internal microcosm, definitively, the body and mind. The final goal of alchemy is to remove duality of spirit and essence, (read mind and body), because the Taoist belief is that they are one, in the original state.

Source. The archaic character for this is literally “three springs under a cliff”, yuan, and makes the clear distinction of source as a natural instance, not a theological or metaphysical one.

Cosmos. This one is so simple, it hardly needs mention. This means “boundaries moving”, yuzhou, telling us that all is continually changing.

Duality. This means “distance” and “return”. As described, “distance” is the particular object/instance as it becomes increasingly distinguished. “Return” is the same particular object/instance relinquishing the current perspective, to be resolved into other things. This is the interplay from the Dao De Jing, “It is given the makeshift name of ‘the great’, being great it is further described as receding, Receding, it is described as far away, Far away, it is described as turning back.”

Non-action. This does not mean to do nothing. It means to apply deference to all involved players in an instance, allowing the highest degree of individual autonomy, without applying force of will. It is strategically flowing with instance.

Fire. This is directly the fervor and impetuosity of the passionate and volatile human mind.

Water. This describes the calm, thoughtful, logical character of the mind, which tempers the fire, to create balance.

Tiger. This is representative of the physical nature of life, all things of physicality, including the martial practices.

Dragon. This is the internal nature of life, the spirit (mind) activity, ostensibly the cultivation of character through meditation and daily practice of virtue.

Jade Furnace. Jade in the Chinese culture is the epitome of calm serenity and quality of work. Much like jade, serenity and quality are inherently fragile. Furnace is obvious in this instance, a place of depth to slow cook. It means the evolution of qualities comes about slowly, refined character is not made in a day. There is no physiological location of the Jade Furnace.

Medicines. These are not physical substances ingested, as is often wrongly played in many of the aberrant forms of religious Taoism. It refers directly to the internal state of knowledge, correct discernment and continual practice of such, and the fact that correct living, driven from the internal state, corrects many of the ailments of daily living.

Mysterious Pass. In alchemical texts, and throughout Taoist reading, this reference, or one of its variants, will be seen numerous times. It is far too often confused with a physical location in the body. I have even seen the misrepresentations go so far as to apply measurements from the spine, kidneys and navel, to show an exact bodily location. Utter rubbish, bordering on forethought of deceit. The Mysterious Pass is discernment, objectivity, clarity, of the processional wavelength of Tao, whereby the microcosm, the inner you, is a direct reflection of the macrocosm, because you have cultivated your mind out of acculturation and the mendacities of mundane human social life.

Golden Elixir, Golden Embryo, Golden Blossom, Golden Pill. All of these refer to the understanding of time and circumstance for solidifying the reality of spirit and essence, (again, read as mind and body). Gold is even, shining, and quality, which the mind must be to unify with the body it, has forgotten. In actuality, it is the condition of autonomy and non-personal knowing in attainment.

Immortal Embryo, Immortal Infant, Uncarved Block. This refers to the original state of being, brought into physicality. At the time in human existence where we are being born, all the vitality of life is present, and the originality of the mind with respect to such is awe and reverence for life itself, and the spirit and essence are one state. The mental and physical gyrations that many erstwhile practitioners and students go through to return to this state are for me, ludicrous beyond belief. They use the eyes to “look” into the forehead, or chest, stomach, genitals, actually believing that the Immortal Embryo physically resides there. This then, is the monument of their failure.

These are just the examples I have chosen to use, a multitude of linguistic pitfalls await the neophyte, especially in illusionary belief that these things fall under the pretense of the physically attainable.

The reader is likely to ask “why then this use of language?” First, there is a natural prose to the originating language, which comes from it being based upon pictograph, which makes it highly interpretive and dialectical. Imagery and visualization are inherent to the language, and in knowing the linguistic visualizations, the appearance of complexity will force more direct attention and focus. Attention and focus will lead to objectivity, clarity, and conscientious daily practice. This then will lead to the state of encompassing discernment. Secondly, in both historical Taoism and Buddhism, many practitioners were given to the belief that the attainment of correct discernment was a path easily taken, and shortcuts were allowable and usable. This was the cause of many tragic and painful deaths from poisoning, starvation, and other forms of bodily destruction due to ignorance, delusion and ego. The ancient teachers “encoded” the language, in order to facilitate the much lengthier passage of time for character development. Hence the development of labeled “secret knowledge”, which is truly nothing of the sort.

How likely is failure? Considering what is believed in the Complete Reality School, there are a minimum of thirty-six hundred methods, and none lead to the desired end result of harmonically balanced spirit and essence. There are gradient degrees of difference of illusionary practice, which illustrated by Zhang Boduan, translate to thirteen gradations of practice. Only the higher road of discernment and dissolution of distraction and ego meet the requirement. This isn’t to say there is only one way. Many paths, one finality.

“When the home is empty and peaceful, the spirit naturally resides there.”

When one has achieved internal silence, the mind can break free of the compulsions of mundane human conditioning.


Sources:

  1. The Book of Balance and Harmony, Thomas Cleary, New York, North Point Press © 1989
  2. Understanding Reality: A Taoist Alchemical Classic, Chang Po-Tauan/Thomas Cleary, Univeristy of Hawaii Press © 1987
  3. Yuan Dao: Tracing Dao to Its Source, D.C. Lau/Roger T. Ames, New York, The Ballantine Publishing Group © 1998
  4. Lao Tzu: Tao Te Ching, D.C. Lau, London, Penguin Group © 1963
  5. The Shambhala Guide to Taoism, Eva Wong, Boston, Shambhala Publications, Inc. © 1997
  6. The Texts of Taoism: Tai Shang Tractate of Actions and their Retributions, James Legge, New York, Dover Publications, Inc. © 1962
  7. flowinghands.com/mbs_htm/mbs.art.alchemy.htm
  8. alchemicaltaoism.com/
  9. egreenway.com/taichichuan/kft1.htm
  10. acupuncture-hi.com/foundermessage.shtml

I haven’t made any forays into eastern philosophy so this is all interesting to me.

I wonder if you could suggest any reading material that would introduce me to this part of world thought.

The first three books listed in the sources are a good start for an inquistor, as they provide extensive introductory sections for historical perspective, and the authors do a fair job of clearing away the clutter created by the translation from interpretive Sanskrit forms to definitionally restrictive Latin forms.

If your target is Chinese philosophy, I also suggest an extensive ancient history of the nation as a companion. Understanding the philosophy is impossible without knowledge of the socio-political underpinnings which created the need for such.

This would hold true regarding any of the “eastern” philosophical formations. The credibility of the logic is inexorably tied to the history of the nation.

amazon.com/gp/sitbv3/reader/ … 014095144X

I loved this. Read it and then wrap it up for your favorite nephew. It has all the basics, and Satyr, it is so you. Thanks, Mas… I’ve been waiting for something like this.

Why do you think that the indescribable things in life can’t be grasped in words - we try, but this concept in particular is so challenging, and because it is Eastern it seems so foreign to many Christian cultures when I think it is a great philosophy to enhance any faith. You?

(Hi, Mas)

:smiley:

Thank you Bessy. I hope it was clear enough, and that I achieved at least a modicum of simplicity in the explanations.

This concept is difficult because of one particular, deciding factor: acculturation. The clinging to that trait, is the foremost downfall, in my opinion.

We humans adore our habits blindly, and with the utmost faith that they are correct and beneficial.

I appreciate your reading, and certainly more, any comments or critiques that you may have for the writing.

First, let me say, a noble effort, Mas. The Tao, as most eastern thought, is frustratingly difficult to understand even by the best student. I’ve studied Tao for many years and I’ve found that I’m not one of the best students. While I refuse to accept the label of mediocre, it is probably fairly close to actuality.

I agree that grasping the subtleties that lead to the AHA! Experience requires some historical background of the times in which the Tao began appearing in pictograph form. Knowing the social history as well as the development of the Chinese history of ideas makes the study of Tao itself more intuitive. In some cases, what is Tao almost demands an understanding of the Chinese cosmological constructs. Further, like all philosophical thought, there are many specific concept words that open what might be incomprehensible otherwise, to understanding. To grasp the significance of Tao requires more than a Sunday afternoon of light reading.

Over time, I’ve developed a “reading list” that I’ve found useful, and I’ve asked people to look at specific translations of Tao Te Ching. Xunzian pointed out that as a introduction, the Chuang Tzu gives a better feel for the mindset of those who grasp and practice way making. I think he is right. To that end, I would suggest a particularly good translation of Chuang Tzu. It is:

The Book of Chuang Tzu translated by Martin Palmer with Elizabeth Breuilly. Published by Arkana/Penguin Books.

Satyr, you would find Tao to be right at home with the pre-platonic Greek thinkers. There is a similarity, a kinship, of early philosophical efforts that crosses cultural lines.

Mas, you know I’d like to dive in, but all I would do is splash about and muddy the water. I’ll follow along as best I can and add my 2 cents if I think I can keep from mucking it up.

Two really fascinating things came up, right in front of me, even though I’ve owned all the books for about fifteen years:

In the Yuan Dao, Balance and Harmony, and Understanding Reality; the best description I think I may have ever seen for Tao, and as usual, utter simplicity: Tao is the flow of the universe in “self-so-becoming”. Strange how many times I’ve read that, and it never connected to anything … so much for my studying skills.

Then the other, in the Yuan Dao, was the nature of Tao as utterly different from the theism most of us encounter, which demand the initial, causal “why” of everything. Tao, being “self-so-becoming” is a generational flow, and as each generation grows outward/forward, it is still an attached antecedent of the previous generation “self-so-becoming”, and the need for the initial, causal “why”, is distinctly obviated, with no effort.

Beautiful. It only took me fifteen years and numerous readings, and finally that tiny little spark was sent off in my mind. If I live another thousand years, it may all be revealed to me … but not if it’s in one of my books, I’ll still miss it.

self-so-becoming… It is sooooo frustrating to use the term processual knowing full well that only the tiniest handful can shed enough ‘knowing’ to wrap themselves around what that simple word carries with it. I remember hitting the wall with the concept. I understood it intellectually but realized I was still carrying too much garbage around to internalize it. I took a week of vacation, disappeared into my high desert hide out, and alternately practiced meditation and sweating blood, but finally managed to get it firmly in place. Nothing has looked the same since. It is the sine qua non of being in as opposed to being as…

That seems to be the crux of most of Yuan Dao, and it seems to capture it directly. Tao can be nothing short of processional, and to see it otherwise, is to not see it at all … I liked the way they went from Tao as “non-personal knowing” … to not Tao as personal knowing …

I know what you’re thinking … muds rising up already, isn’t it?

Hi Mas,

I don’t want this to become a two way between us, so I’m going to shut up and let others ask questions or comment. And yes, I’ll sit still and let the mud settle…

No one else will come, it’s okay tentative.

Most others don’t relish in this, it doesn’t fit “philosophy” and it doesn’t fit “religion” …

Have it at, it’s going to be no more than three people.

A processual universe. So much contained in a single word. “One may never step into the same river twice”. It is a great visual, is it not? The experience (river) constantly changes. What too many fail to recognize is that the observer is in constant change as well. What we experience changes us in the experiencing. It is a mutual interaction, this thing called experience. All experience is provisional and indeterminate. As an experience unfolds, new thoughts change both our thinking and acting. In turn, our immediate thoughts (perspective) proscribe and order the new thoughts within that experience. Each experience is a transaction between an affective and cognitive shaping of the experience and being affectively and cognitively shaped by that experience. The relative persistence of structure (from rocks to symbolic language) allows us to declare “things”. This is all together necessary to make sense of the world, but all things and symbols are but convenient contingency and the processual flow of both experience and perspective suggests that the river and our experiencing of it is always unique.

In this understanding, one can see that a processual experiencing of the world denies a fixed rationality because all knowledge of things (structure) is contingent. We know specifically, but only to the extent that we are willing to allow the specificity of our knowing to change as we experience.

It is the recognition of a processual universe that is found in so many chapters of Tao Te Ching that call for an emptying out of knowing (static) until there is nothing but the immediacy of the present experience. So many view this as suggesting a return to naine ignorance, but it is the opposite. It is a call to not become trapped in the illusion of concrete knowing, to hold the understanding (perspective) and enter each new experience with as little pre-conceived knowing as possible.

This is my interpretation and understanding so there is every good chance I’ve got it all wrong, but there it is. This barely scratches the surface of how the concept of a processual universe permeates every word written about what is Tao.

Sometimes in public forums when two or three debaters become involved in an interesting discussion which expresses, in general, the opinions of those reading along, the audience prefers to listen or read and learn and admire.

When there is nothing the individual can add to the discussion at hand then the individual should keep silent and simply listen.

Learning to listen is no less a talent to be nurtured than learning to speak.

Please proceed.

My two cents.

And doesn’t this “processual universe” cause vertigo?
Does it not fill us with anxiety and fear?

It’s a little disconcerting to think of ourselves as a river of thinking having no core thinker - a melody (to connect this to another thread) of notes over utter silence.

I wonder if these eastern philosophies had a direct influence on Greek thought (on Heraclitus for instance) or if the similar conclusions were reached independently.

I’ll have to read more on the Tao.

Hi Satyr,

Vertigo? Perhaps momentarily, but it is actually an understanding that reinforces and defines center. The anxiety and fear comes from the illusion of a fixed self and not a fluid changing part of all that is. It is in letting go of this fixed externalization of self that the true core thinker appears.

There are a number of theories about the congruency of early philosophical thought. Most seem to point to India as the probable point of origin since the earliest written forms appear there. But yes, Hericlitus, the Thalian school in particular, Taoism, Confucianism, all seemed to arise at about the same time. It would have been a wonderful time to be alive - or maybe not. How people lived without Ipods is incomprehensible…

Processional/generational is the ambient wavelength, and I personally don’t believe it should be vertigo, but that it most often is, so your perspective appears correct. This is the illusionary aspect of most human perception.

Fear and anxiety? Of course and absolutely. In the poetic manner that tentative put forth, and captured precisely what I have been studying in Yuan Dao, the order of the human mind attempts to proscibe concreteness to all, which is unnatural. Hence, fear and anxiety are the standardised responses to fluidity.

That which is contained within the symbology of Tao that pertains to the Immortal Embryo/Uncarved Block is deemed to be the correct manner. Not fear and anxiety, because we cannot affix the permanency of the universe to a proscibed definition, but to approach all with awe and reverence, as we admire the unfolding, “self-so-becoming”, of experience within, as guided from without.

There then, with what I just wrote, is how we see the general belief that Tao is ornate and extravagant in language. Awe has a tendency to draw this type of language. I, for one, enjoy the fear and anxiety of non-personal knowing, and the ability to express with color that which is self-so-becoming.

My knowledge of Chinese history is certainly sad and incomplete, but to my knowledge, the ethnocentricity of the Chinese would have made it unlikey, although it appears that they are concordant, but independently profound instances of cognitive development. Tentative is correct that the eastern development appears historically to arrive first in India, but as was stated in the writing, even if you bring a new idea to China, the Chinese will work with it, until it becomes something Chinese, as with Pure Land and Chan Buddhism.

tentative, remind me to slap you at the first available opportunity … lol.

P.S. I agree with Satyr as far as the listening, you are certainly correct. But also consider, as I know you will understand … the inquisitor most often opens doors that may not be available from simply reading books. Your interest is appreciated and valuable.

Just to toss out a couple of notions, none of which are specifically substantiated, I offer the following:

Taoist thought is essentially ascosmotic: The idea of a knowable creator isn’t even a question. Further, ther is no knowing of any “grand design” or plan of the universe. While we discern a sense of order and balance, there is no specificity to those seeings and sensings.

Taoists are dualistic, but not in the traditional western sense of being and nothingness, but in the understanding that positives and negatives arise together, that one defines the other, that they are coterminous.

Taoism is anarchical in that interaction left to the nature of the constituants will provide the best possible outcomes. This is different than conventional western thought where one must answer whether man is intrinsically evil or good. Taoism assumes that our intrinsic nature is neither good nor evil, and that only in intereaction with others will accomodation be accomplished. This is a much different conclusion than many models of human interaction that assumes that only external control is viable.

I’m sure Mas will have all the suporting quotes and references to support these suppositions…

Of course. With a processional/generational perspective, each instance alludes to the previous and the antecedent, “self-so-becoming” is not modelled, but continually created from non-causal wavelength.

Yin rises, yang follows, as yang recedes again, making way for yin to rise yet again. One gives rise to two, two to three, and three to the myriad, is also the converse: the myriad recede to three, three to two, and two to the One, simultaneously.

The certainty of this is difficult to refute, especially as we watch entropy created by incessancy of will of force. “In seeing one does not know, in knowing, one does not see.”

Positions are equated, reference is from constructed definition and “words” never complete the picture.

As I know you will understand, this morning’s activities are my Tao. I took my mat out on the front stoop, watched the sun rise. Body relaxed, eyes closed and the mind emptied. I could “feel” life happening around me … the cricket to my right, scurrying under debris, cicadas in the front tree barking for superiority, the finches and bluejays vieing for territory, the lady and the St. Bernard commenting on the strange man sitting on his step, school buses with children talking and laughing, wind rustling leaves, wind grooming the grass, sunlight beaming gently but with continuity momentarily shaded by passing clouds … three hours passed, and still nothing was without attention.

I always found eastern spirituality and religions to be more mature or, at least, more honest than western ones.

Mastriani

I do something very similar.
I’ve always been a morning person.
I don’t like talking or being bothered in the morning - I’m grumpy - but I like the calm serenity of it.

My body feels relaxed and full of energy awaiting my focus.
I enjoy reading or writing or thinking, while drinking a cup of coffee, as a way of preparing for the challenges of the day.

I’ve always loved sunrises and sunsets; that in-between state of wakefulness and slumber.
The world is beautiful then.

I have a different perspective. What has become of “Western” religions is to much literalness. The value of the abstract and obscure that was inherent in the original languages, has been destroyed by overtranslation into Latin-Germanic themes, which give only two definitive paths: absolute literalism, (fundamentalism), and it’s antithesis, wrongful interpretation, (mysticism). They both venture to the extreme, hence, lack the balance.

Again, because of the damage “revealing” all the language did in many “Eastern” philosophies, people became extreme, and paid dearly for it. Many “Eastern” philosophies returned to the older method of allegory, metaphor and prose to lengthen the process, in essence, helping to develop the character first, and allow the fulfillment of the mind to come after this event.

Too much yang, and the aggression takes hold, and yin is lost. Too much yin, and apathy sets in, and yang is lost. The process becomes broke when balance is sacrificed for an absolutist stance on “how it all happens”.

I am quite the same, but also attempting to relearn that the beauty that one sees in an instance, is always present, we just allow our sight to it to become clouded by self-inflicted imbalance. That would be self-so-becoming.

No one ever said it would be an easy path.