The computer hardware and operating system are comparable to the brain and body of the brain-body. The computer boot-up or start is comparable to the wake-up of the brain-body; both are ready for action. With boot-up of the computer and wake-up of the brain-body, applications can be loaded and the
brain-body’s sensibility, mentality, emotionality, body feelings and physicality
are functional; nothing else is necessary. Finally, the computer goes to sleep
and so does the brain-body. What can be deduced from this comparison: the
brain-body has no need for consciousness and the computer is fully functional.
Is the computer programmed like the brain/body with the capacity to say no to its programming, which includes such functions that may conflict with each other and cannot all happen at the same time & must be ranked? Is it programmed with the capacity to rewrite its ranking system?
If its capacities/functions must be programmed into it … what of anyone else’s?
No, it’s not. The computer (the old fashioned one) is not.
Well. How is that relevant now?
You mean the original unprogrammed programmer.
The pattern after which we are all programmed as programmers.
Right?
The original does not need to rewrite its ranking system, though it has that capacity—to use it would be a privation/malfunction. It always ranks according to itself (self=other). By choice.
The original Original is like a super Super computer, that’s self enclosed protected against decay, in fact there was no such thing before it
Every other computing system derives from it, but the longer It goes on more of that leaves the system into diminishing accessible sub systems. Depending on how far back, can the lost ones be recoverable .
The ones lost for ever can only remain by the traces they left,
The original loves a good “lost cause” challenge.
Almost like he wouldn’t’ve even done this whole thing if it wasn’t for that lost cause.
Get ready for a surprise, not-so-surprise “end”ing.
The lost cause is a built in feature of the cause
Without that the cause would<>could not affect any cause less effect (or the Other way around)
Therefore, self=other
SO, why bother to go out tonight
Tao
If my post is true, I think a “Data” is on the horizon because consciousness is not an obstacle; only the functions of humanity are an obstacle. AI is raging and then there is the help of quantum computing.
Which functions of humanity? Obstacle to what?
If my post is true, AI creators do not have consciousness as an obstacle and with quantum computing
should be able to create a “Data”.
What if the AI process’s data is not false but still infinitissamily far from the hypothetical quantum generated Truth? Yet close enough to be as near as consciousness to qualify as functional.
Functions: sensibility, mentality, emotionality, physicality. Consciousness is an
obstacle to AI development.
AI needs to be an android.
What if to be partly conscious to function, some of the conditional receptors may not yet operational, can a more advanced AI like a IPhone to be developed, compensate to become partially conscious?
So the OP is saying if the brain-body (or computer) requires consciousness (OP posits it does not), it would be an obstacle to developing a Data (android from Star Trek), if AI is not considered fully functional without consciousness.
He equates computer/brain “waking” from “sleep” to being fully functional (running its programs) to be all that is required to build a Data/android.
If he’s right… from where did he get the concept of consciousness?
Wacky stuff right there.
Got it, except was really thinking of Musk’s idea of him developing his smart phone, within the foreseeable future that would blow competition out of the water
AI seems to want to be always 1 step ahead
???
All anyone really needs to do is be in step with God.
…and he will make your paths straight.
Downright, straightup liquefaction.
Somethin. up , man
Uncertainty quantification as an expression of the nature of Gods willing nonessential to go along with it (It) in search of the certainty of the uncertain limit, or reversely?