Concertation camps were sued across the world in times of war.
Native Americans were rounded up and moved to Oklahoma or placed in concertation camps.
Japanese Americans were placed in camps.
Most deaths in German camps occurred due to disease, malnutrition and not due to some plan for mass extermination.
The lies they fed you is not the whole truth.
What of the atrocities conducted against Germans after the war?
What about the atrocities against Native Americans when the had been totally defeated?
What about the atrocities against Palestinians?
What about the atrocities against all those sovereign nations the US bombed to the stone age and then invaded, using some pretext?
Spare me your selective humanism.
This is called “virtue signalling” implying some kind of moral high-ground.
If man is to be overcome, then let this nihilistic Abrahamic, postmodern victim hierarchy be overcome first.
Your self-righteousness reflects your american brainwashing.
Beyond Good & Evil, no…it’s your idol’s words.
In war, one does what one must to win.
Imagining the enemy as ‘evil’ or ‘insane’ or ‘dull’ as you do, is part of the brainwashing.
Everyone who resits Jew dominated Americanism is insane, crazy, evil, or stupid, no?
And you are good and smart, right?
Is your position that the extermination camps were real and necessary because of the war, or that they weren’t real but if they had been they would have constituted an atrocity?
My motive is to see the truth.
I describe what I see, without expressing my preference.
My preference has nothing to do with what is.
When I say races and genders are not social constructs, this is not my preference.
That you equate opinion with self-interest makes you conventional.
This is why you cannot relate to why Hitler did what he did, and you identify with the victims.
Tell me, when you watch a documentary of lions and it displays how a pride hunts and eats their prey, while it is still alive…do you identify with the prey or the predator?
Both are in a war for survival.
Do you feel the prey’s pain and not the joy of the predator that will survive another day?
Do you consider it inhuman that they should tear the animal apart while it is still conscious?
How about speaking some, then. My question was simple and straightforward.
Is your position that the extermination camps were real and necessary because of the war, or that they weren’t real but if they had been they would have constituted an atrocity?
it was implied that from the perspective of the Germans, or any side in a war, certain things are necessary.
Objectively speaking.
This has nothing to do with what I would do, or if I agree with it.
A war is fought for reasons; victory is the objective.
If concertation camps eliminate an internal destabilizing threat then that is what is done.
The issue is when you pretend to be moral and righteous and you contradict your own principles - that’s hypocrisy.
Like beating a man and screaming in pain…
I find that disgusting…
Lies and lairs…especially pretentious ones.
Can you spell it out for us dumb Jews? I still can’t for the life of me make out what your opinion is on this very simple matter.
Is your position that the extermination camps were real and necessary because of the war, or that they weren’t real but if they had been they would have constituted an atrocity?
Such binary thinkers.
They were real, and exaggerated for political reasons - and they were necessary from the perspective of the perpetrators.
No rules in love and war.
That’s adding too many things. All I want to know is if the original impression I got from what you said is accurate, which is: if the extermination camps existed, and we agree they did, they were atrocities.
What a manipulative boy you are.
Camps existed. Many died in them.
Many things happen in times of war. Spinning them after the war, by the victors, is propaganda.
How am I manipulative? Hahaha I asked a simple, direct, unambiguous question. And you have taken 20 posts not to answer what you could have answeered in one. Be a man.