[b]NoelyG,
[/b]What would you say if I responded with intuition and what I feel to be a fair amount of research?
…
Alright… I’ll try and explain it (this thread) from my point of view… perhaps that will clear things up.
When I look at that article, I see a bunch of entries/recording/whatever, mostly from the 40-70’s era in fact. What I find to be perfectly logical, yet intuitively incorrect is that even half of these would be recorded with the explicit knowledge that they had perpetrated some hoax in which actual people disappear for some reason or another. To further explicate this, I would also find it logical possible, yet intuitively incorrect that a sole person would engineer an enter booklet of claims, most of which could probability be checked into to one degree or another.
I find it intuitively incorrect that every circle crop is a hoax, or that every UFO spotting is someone’s cry for attention. Or that every abduction story is just some psychological phenomenon. Government technology is at worst, 20 years ahead of us, and if you haven’t noticed… that’s a pretty big difference to us, at what appears to be, and is in a cosmic sense, the barest trickles of the incoming exponential wave.
You can feel when people are being sincere, even in writing. That’s part of the mystery as to how we can communicate – we’re all connected. Sure I come across a ton of bullshit but it’s like a net (no pun intended), when you sweep it through the Internet sea, eventually the logical bits start to add up.
What people have a hard time understanding is that it’s nothing new, the answers have been here all along. All around us. Folk stories, movies, legends, it all starts to add up in a conceptual time line.
But anyways, coming back to the article, it doesn’t matter if you can find a few stories which don’t add up, the point is: Can you accept that we’re being watched? That humans are viewed as no less that ignorant potential?
If you can, you’ll understand why our potential actually entails, and it’s significant.