I’ve fucking had it.
What’s the deal with Nietzsche?
If ever I was going to listen, it is now. Don’t undersetimate me this time (fucking manga clichés).
His deal? His mother and sister babied him, gave him a self fulfilling prophecy of following in his fathers shoes. You only need to see Citizen Kane too see how strong a early scene can morph and change a person on its singular repetitive basis. He didnt want to die, and was caught up in Feuerbach and Max Stirner in his early days. Think Walker here on this forum + citizen kane… but it offered him a way out. The Jesuit Baltisar and Schropenhauer had massive influence on his thinking and style, and he continued on his high school studies to investigate the vendanta religions, as well as the Babist (we call them Bahai now) and Sheikh religion… but never via primary texts. He was able to take in more eastern quotes such as from confucius and chuang tzu with ease. He had access to The Book of Mani and the Bhagavata Purana… at least to the extent of quoting it. He knew of the Mahabhrata and Ramayana since he was 17 but doesnt show a strong grasp on it. Basically, he did a grand tour of philosophy, and made his post christian overman have elements of every philosophy minus the christian ones.
His personality type via MBTI is INTJ, with emphasis on both Supplementry Motor areas, seen by a lot of mystics as the seat of the soul… literally Keter. He took his later refined religious skepticism from Spinoza, but not his good sense. He composed a autobiography of himself as a last measure of keeping himself alive as a person once he would soon pass… it was heavily based on Jerome Cardans autobiography. He came into contact with it undoubtedly during his dieting stage… and as Jerome was the same personality that Nietzsche and I was, it stuck. Nietzsche hit Hume both because he was big as well because he was envious, and this shows in his plans. He accepted Darwin, but had to make Darwin his own. Nietzsche’s whole philosophy was entirely selfish… but not for the selfish reasons everyone supposed… it was done for the sake of health, so that he might live. His outline for Dionysius I have not read, but I can gather from his later emphasis on Tertullian, the wheel hub concept of the mahabhrata, Machiavelli’s Wheel of Fortune and the Contempt for Boethius the direction it was going. Asia minor, in a cave, where the religious zealotry first emerged in a philistine mithra christian perversion of the dionysian cult.
He was showing doubts about this towards the end. The panic and realization he passed the point of no return too… this realization sets in on many insane men before it completely takes them. His left hemisphere left him first.
His taste of war… all I can find is he was a medic. Thought great thoughts of glory when the infantry were shell shocked and dying around him. I severly doubt he picked up the disease then… he never got injured with open wounds. He didnt catch a STD from his mother, as his sister was clean. Nor was he fucking her as his later delusional state suggests. He got it from the Whore house almost certainly,just like everyone else did. His cock was all fucked up, and was thus a celibate. Was still a man though… Lou was known to cuckold.
There is more… always much more, but I gotta go. Night approaches.
Just cultivate yourself and quite searching out idols. Your country was enslaved for this very characteristic.
Fantastic answer
Maybe I can find a way to get you to go deeper.
Deleted (irrelevant).
You could press me on a aspect of his thought, or ask why I am for or against him on a complex of issues. But this would essentially ruin you as a thinker… you would be no better than a 20th Century French Philosopher running high on too many details and picking and choosing between authorities, frantically trying to add your voice to their chorus, showing in result how childish, immature, and poorly thought out your own root motivations are. In the ocean of philosophy, I am a leviathan of the deep. Its as much a endeavor as my nature to be so… but there was never a guarantee in this arising as my eventual reality. My confrontation with a great many events brought me to here. I am now confident enough of my own nature and capacity to behave in a manner seemingly unbecomming. I can go against the norm in sacrificing a retarding aspects of myself others would dread the lost of… all so I can polish another aspect of myself before moving on.
You are a guppy. Your history gives you a edge and a imperative to grow and outcompete those around you… but in all honesty, who are they? Is overcoming them, shining in their light going to solve any of those questions and cruel or intriging occurances of your earliest memories? The mark of a philosophy is how he questions, the formulation of identity into adulthood is a metaphysical understanding of thishistoric process. We seek in others replacements for the questions we ourselves we not brave enough to live up to in acknowledging. Why do I ask, and why did I make this choice, continue to make it, and how did it arise in my head in the first place to rationally accept it as my life, and make sense of it within my cultures?
It is unwise to take too much from one man. Even the method I described here is a psychological brutality tearing you focus and understanding. We all seek a Didache of sorts. I can say to you only caution in over acceptance and too easy in a life of following if you find yourself repressing counter thoughts, or noting the ease the bounce off and away. This is a rotten core of hipocrisy. Build what you care to otherwise… but also beware of turning other men rotten in turn.
You’re good, there’s no doubt about it.
I feel tempted to press on, but it’s true that this thread is… unbecoming, and that you have given what you were asked.
God bless, carry on.