The closest definitions for my religious values that come to mind are Agnostic and Pantheism. But I don’t find these accurate enough.
Pantheism suggests that although a God is self evident in natural things, it still includes doctrines of benevolence. Agnosticism (a bit closer) states that it simply cannot be known. I may not have imperical evidence, but I put faith in my belief. Which is . . .
That the cosmos has a will. It is not ruled by an omnipotent being. It is randomly generated, and we are wandering particles of its accidental make. But it . . . wants . . . things. At the very least, probably a binary reward and punishment operation. It does not divide people appropriately upon their death based on their cruelties and repentance. Still, it wants to administer a treatment. We have instincts of reward and punishment because it is beneficial to survival of the species. Bad people in our tribe threaten our survival. Good people aid our survival. But maybe there is more than instinct that aids our growth . . . and demands a suffering or death of – not the unconcsious things that prevent growth, but the wills that prevents growth. We are randomly generated machines that carry on some will of the cosmos.