I’ve recently taken on a Yin-like outlook.
More passive. Yea-saying. Amalgumating. Recessing.
Lo, so much for explaining.
My reasoning for such?
#The universe is greater than myself. #I cannot resist things greater than myself. #I should instead flow with things greater than myself, in order to become something greater than myself.
Such a concept is quite passive, though.
“Flowing” is not about moral chastity, or any sort of conflictions.
A mind of non-friction would not even tourment itself with baseless addictions to stress and toxins.
I say: The low have not gone down low enough,
And they have not gone back so far as to master their ultimate source, or their origin.
Also, as such,
I am taking more an interest in the passed than the future.
I wanteth to flow back into “what was”, before it separated.
While I understand your intentions, I would advise to refrain from limiting yourself, mentally or spiritually, to anything at any point in your lifetime. I believe man is neither bad nor good all the time. Man can not classify himself with the broad stroke of simple explanations because man is a complicated being that requires complicated explanations. At any time, we are capable of the highest of thought and action or the lowest in thought and action. The Yin-yang symbol is not to be separated. You must understand that you are neither solely Yin or solely Yang. You are, at all times, the circle that encompasses both Yin and Yang.
To classify onself in one area of the human spectrum alone, for any period of time, is to slow and limit edification. Be open to yourself and be ready to accept and understand the many lessons, no matter where they come from, that come before us in life.
Well Dan~ a low profile will make it much harder for your spidey suit to act up and overcome you at the important moment! - Gives it less “moral purchase” on ya…
I know that, and then, I forget it.
Dualities are the left and the right hands.
They polarize, so that they may out-reach and grasp fruitage.
Infact, right now, I’m really wondering about unified polarities, or co-dependent divisions. And what becomes more same as things change, etc. I am pondering chaos. I think that’s a step above the nothing or nihilism that many got caught in before-hand.
Two nice people replied to my thread, though, I’m impressed. Hugs
