Dan's "Theory of magick"~

Before the statement:
Some key realization points and foundationalisms would be:

*Infinite infinities exist.

*All substance possesses potential.

*Potential is infinitely various.

*Anything is possible if given the means.

*Only a minor percentage of reality is perceived by the physical senses, thus sanctioned belief is retardation.

*There is a way to achieve anything.

*Earth beings have the potential to manifest the potential of what they are, and each is universe.

*Self-control is control of universe.

*Control comes best through full understanding, as it is a form of engineering.

Theory of Magic:

There are infinite forms of magic, but real magic is often the understanding of self and the understanding of environment; an understanding which gets so deep that it leads to some measure of control, and the understanding cannot be comprehended or seen by the common people. What is far above the normal average, is seen as “supernatural”, “paranormal” and becomes misjudged by the ignorant. The ignorant ARE the majority, and normality is banality.

Explanation and proof are each finite remedy – for the ignorance of the audience. Whilst being too ignorant to already know what another appears to know, they may actually call him stupid for not being able to undo their own stupidity with his expressions. Thus, what is beyond the tiny minds is seen as non-sense, unreal, scary or crazy. Proof of magic is a burden, an attempted compensation for another mind’s lacking. Though I may be able to “prove” and “explain” one form of magic, how much of a burden would it be for me to “prove” and “explain” all of the other forms of magic? And if I did “prove” and “explain” all forms of magic, who would comprehend my explanation or even bother reading it?

The American democracy’s media, 2006, is a perfect example of the mentalities which I am talking about. The media revolves around repetition of simple, superficial concepts, predigested statistics and propaganda. But if none of these things were tolerated, they would no longer be funded, either, and thus would not exist. These kinds of people don’t care about proof and explanation of what is beyond normal. They care about amusement, and simple, quick, easy “answers” [which are more often lies]. “All magic is from the devil”, would be a perfect example of a quick, simple, easy “answer” which is just a lie. There’s no use trying to save the people from that which they have chosen and that which they will cling to, as YOU cannot save them from themselves, thus do not feel obligated to prove or explain anything that YOU already know and understand.

Dan(…squiggle here), it’s these bits of symbology you pass out, that make me continually read your threads, and anticipate the next one coming with bated, and baited, breath.

Well done. Keep it coming brother.

The domain of expression is sacrosanct to the spirit of life. What else have we, in being crude form?

:laughing:

You made my day.

I thought most people wouldn’t want it.

I have nothing to share with you, if I have not first listened to you express your mind.

Lead on Squiggle man, lead on.

I made 2 replies here:
ilovephilosophy.com/phpbb/vi … p?t=153420

It was my latest bit.

Mast, I think I am beginning to become aware of what your mrs enjoyed within you. Though I’d seen your frustrations, etc., on ILP, I am also guessing that you are very capable of showing and giving love to someone or something, etc.

We can talk about that more at the other thread, if you like.

Oy, young Grasshopper Squiggle … [thwack][thwack] screams of sobbing student

Have I taught you nothing!!!

The “Mrs.” doesn’t enjoy anything about me, unfortunately for her, she married an “all man” type of man …

She merely tolerates me, when it suits her whims. :evilfun:

Oh shit. :astonished: :laughing:

Is “Mrs. Squiggle” any different?

Are you truly surprised by the event, or just surprised that someone would word out the way the event actually occurs?

I have found most of your posts to be quite truthful. “Reality” as we so eloquently term it, is not Reality because we are not truly conscious enough to know what Reality is. Good post, Dan

You cute. :wink:

So, Dan~, How’s the heart?

Dan~, I am not amazed. This I expect of you, and it is excellent. Keep it up.

Be a Shephard.

Here’s a challenge for you Dan: explain your theory or whatever you want to call it without using words. Words are an aspect of reality.

If it were not for the words which are a cocept of reality which you speak, you would not be able to ask such a question nor comprehend anything being said. This being the case you have said nothing and asked nothing and will most likely get nothing in return.
For what you ask is to deny the very principle of reality on which your question is based.

Words are nothing but strokes and marks your mind and belief in such reality is what give them meaning. If you believe they are meaningless than they are. If you believe they mean somthing than they do. what they mean when put together the diferent concepts and structures provide infinite possibilities to Knowledge or beliefs and realities.

Would you deny such an infinality?
Would you deny reality and your own exsistance based thus to merely jibe at a philosiphy of another only to undue your very self by such action?

Or would you take heed and withdraw the meaning of such said words to yeild the infanitality of the illusion for which you call reality?

Well, if he was up to it, he could always just draw a picture…art goes beyond words, so does music…something I’ve actually been very interested in lately, particularly the music part.

True, But then one “usualy” has to use words to explain the meaning of ones art or it is mistranslated or misunderstood.