"Darwin" gene concept

“Darwin” gene concept
(This is the translation software to translate papers )

The gene cannot change by the environment, how then the gene is does increase, how does the new gene is form? The gene mutation has caused the hereditary change, and affected together with the environment has formed the natural selection, how then the gene mutation forms the mimicry? Regarding the mimicry, the result which the observation post obtains by the hall but the hall was explained lacks “the morals” for the choice and the competition “the survival of the fittest” the scientific theory to manifest, how much time but this kind of choice needs and the probability can obtain that 种性状? Therefore the mimicry and the choice essentially radically is unable to relate, but this species are obtain through several generation of strengthening, for instance some kind of butterfly because of avoids more and more looking like some plants flowers, discusses the viewpoint with Darwin’s choice which birds’ capture changes, this kind of butterfly obviously is the compatible behavior and the condition which makes to own protection, but the mimicry actually certainly is not at the biosphere the universal condition, but is lies in under two living thing attribute mutually long-term dependence, the biology does not move in the situation completes mutually imitates, the latter darwinism appearance although does not have total repudiation Darwin, but actually proposed the question to Darwin, The biological evolution is the gene mutation and the natural environment dual chooses the multi- decisions in the Darwin eye, and thought the gene the sudden change has nothing to do with with the environment, but the gene occurs wrongly in the stochastic process changes gradually the result, this from some kind of significance said the gene is the gene, the species choice may expand to the gene in, but gene itself changes suddenly with the external environment does not have the relation, the gene to be allowed to decide the species the behavior way and follows the environmental variation to produce one kind of new kind, but why environment can’t itself actually change the gene stochastically to jump the way, Some kind of superiority gene and in the survival struggle escapes death by a hair’s breadth the species are the genuine powerhouse, can evolve the species which Cheng Geng consummates? Only has been actually right one half, the gene also is along with the environmental variation, also is we is called as “the memory” the thing, took has the field to exist, only is Darwin has not seen the gene stochastic sudden change the trend, only then has obtained such conclusion, the animal compatibility is follows the goal? By Darwin’s opinion, whether the stochastic sudden change or the hybrid butterfly can turn beautifully in which one day “the flowers”? The choice evolution only can explain the behavior habitual superiority, feasible no doubt cannot let it for the habit likely spend, if accidentally false fits out “the flowers” to be able to hide hunting for, then the butterfly can strengthen this “the habit”, but essentially the butterfly simply does not need any habit, the camouflage color completely is the gene change, it cannot as soon as start on the elephant “the flowers”, only because considered gene stochastic sudden change too Guang Taida, turned “the flowers” the probability nearly low is unable the imagination, Therefore must want truly to turn a butterfly “the flowers” not to be simply impossible from the existing geology age to determine, it needs the time can be longer, also does not conform to Darwin’s determination, possibly whips the computer on likely the monkey to be same. Just the opposite, the morphogenesis field supposition actually supports the environment and the gene interaction, also regards as the gene and the environment relation the life opening system the essential foundation, butterfly’s gene so long as achieved a gene mutation Chang Zhijiu may the instinct coincidence avoid exterminating, concurrently displays one kind of camouflage system, this inevitably is the gene in small scope high frequency change, in this official morphogenesis flower’s fresh object field and the butterfly resonate the result, this kind resonated had achieved one kind of ingenious general idea led the event, its result was two kinds

Your translation software sucks

基因不能被环境所改变,那么基因是如何增加的,新基因是如何形成的?基因突变导致了遗传性变化,并且与环境共同作用形成了自然选择,那么基因突变是如何形成拟态的?对于拟态,观察所得到的结果被堂而堂解释为选择与竞争而缺乏“道德性”的“适者生存”的科学理论体现,不过这种选择需要多少时间和几率才能获得那种性状?因此拟态与选择本质上根本无法联系,而这一物种是通过数代的强化得到的,比如某种蝴蝶因为避免鸟类的捕捉而变的越来越象某种花,用达尔文的选择论观点,这种蝴蝶显然是对自身保护而作出的适应性行为和状态,但拟态却并不处于生物界的普遍状态,而是在于两种生物属性的相互长期依赖下,生物不迁徙的情况下完成的互仿,后达尔文主义的出现虽然没有全盘否定达尔文,但却对达尔文提出了质疑,在达尔文眼里生物进化是基因突变和自然环境的双重选择多决定的,并认为基因的突变与环境无关,而基因在随机过程中发生错误的渐变结果,这从某种意义上说基因就是基因,物种选择可以被扩大到基因中,但基因本身突变和外界环境没有联系,基因可以决定物种的行为方式并伴随着环境变化而产生一种新种,但为什么环境本身却不能改变基因的随机跳跃方式,某种优势基因和生存斗争中幸免于难的物种才是真正的强者,才能进化成更完善的物种?其实只对了一半,基因也是随环境变化的,也就是我们称作“记忆”的东西,作为一个发生场而存在,只是达尔文没有看见基因随机突变的趋向性,才得出了这样的定论,动物适应性是伴随目的性的?以达尔文的言论,是否随机突变或杂交的蝴蝶会在哪一天变成一朵美丽的“花朵”?选择进化只能解释行为习性的优越性,可行为习性固然不会让其更象花,如果偶然伪装成“花朵”能够躲过捕猎者,那么蝴蝶就会强化这一“习性”,但本质上蝴蝶根本不需要任何习性,伪装颜色完全是基因的改变,它不会一开始就象“花朵”,只因为考虑到基因随机突变太广太大了,变成“花朵”的概率几乎低的无法想象,因此要想把一只蝴蝶真正变成“花朵”根本不可能从现有的地质学年代来判定,它需要的时间会更漫长,也不符合达尔文的判定,可能就象猴子拍打计算机一样。恰恰相反,形态发生场的假设却支持环境与基因的互动,也把基因与环境的联系看作生命开放系统的本质基础,蝴蝶的基因只要达到一个基因突变的常值就可以本能的巧合避免灭绝,并发展出一种伪装系统,这必然是基因在小范围中的高频变化,这正式形态发生中花的生物场与蝴蝶共振的结果,这种共振达到了一种巧妙的大概率事件,其结果是两种生物的依赖关系,蝴蝶开始“模仿”,蝴蝶趋向于这种模仿时,当这种共振优势加强时,基因开始受到某种“力”的牵制,开始这种恒常式基因突变,其结果必然有悖达尔文设立的理论,基因的突变并非达尔文所认为的那样不受环境约束,相反基因的变化于环境息息相关,而自然选择才只是其中一种原则。除此之外生物界还有共生原则,即某一种生物的产生给另一种生物带来好处,并相互进化,这在自然界也是非常普遍的,比如某种鸟类提供了植物传播的途径,植物也同样为某种鸟类提供了更强健的食物使其基因更完善,又一种物种的出现发迁徙会给另一个物种带来利益和促进,生存竞争只强调生物进化到达的一面,这显然缺乏辨证思想。共生原则也不仅仅给拟态带来了一种可观解释,也符合形态发生的假说,和生存竞争一道成为了进化的基础,而并非只是生存选择。同时形态发生学也给出了基因适应环境的全新“蓝图”。基因是与外界交换信息的,也是随机定态系统,基因的改变不只是试错或杂交中得来,而同样是环境对本身的影响和约束,是和环境相互作用的结果。