A prosititue will say she sleeps for an object.
A woman will give up her body for what causes if she slept with more than one man? The object of love or temporaily love?
Or you all don’t have a clue what I am babbling about?
Why is this post women-centred? The whole idea as a very gynophobic twinge to it.
Women . . . and sexuality? The Horror!
Next thing you know, they’ll be telling me the female orgasm is real. Let me tell you from experience: it doesn’t exist. Na-uh. Anybody who tells you it does is a liar.
Its all been a pack of lies!?!?!
I think you both are lying. the forum is a lie. and I am lying what I am saying.
lying is for cowards and 8 year old girls
I’m a coward with a wonderfully vicious dominate gf at hand 
.
Mundane Babble
A
No, but I never do. 
[size=67](Note to self: never read another post by this guy)[/size]
Dan - it appears that the distinction here is only the particular “object” that is transferred. Is that what you are getting at? If you are willing to say that there is a transfer regardless of which type of woman you are speaking of, then there is no material difference by your own stipulations. This would make yours a rhetorical question.
Did some chick piss you off?
This sounds likeone of those “a chick just pissed me off” questions.
You may as well ask about the dude here - every transaction has at least two parties.
I knew the results. I just wanted to see will it come about.
Now I have seen it, I have no interest in this question anymore.
Dan, you have a keen sense of mundane babble.
What about a woman who sleeps with an object?
Wait… what?
Also, you say that a woman gives up her body. Sex isn’t nessisarily like that. Girls want sex too. If women are giving up their bodies then there are just as many men out there giving their dicks away.