‘non-spatial’ isn’t very descriptive. Also are you claiming that theres no spacetime?? Also whats the diference between this non-spacial dimension imparting time and it actually being time??
I think that space and time are just our perceptions of a thing called spacetime which is itself nothing more than a dualist interpretation of the single eternal way which incompasses space, time, energy, mass and information. But its just an idea.
The non-spatial imparts motion (Time, a change in the spatial) to us via the electron/photon ‘dance’. Electrons swarm photons, giving matter it’s ‘speed’. The more the swarm, the faster the matter.
Time is relative to the speed of the matter, or being, involved.
Many think time is the fourth dimension, that’s wrong. It’s the spatial that is time. The fourth dimension is the non-spatial, which ITSELF moves. This dimensional movement imparts the speed in the spatial.
Spatial= Things IN IT move
Non-spatial= Things in it do not move (no real ‘things’), the dimension itself moves.
How do things in the spatial reach the non-spatial? By changing…by dissipating and compressing until the ‘thing’ has more of itself in the non-spatial, thus speeding up, thus changing it’s ‘time’ and thus itself imparting motion.
When you die you will dissipate, what we call rot. You do not disappear, you become electromagnetic waves and move quaquaversally until you compress. You will ‘speed up’ thus near the non-spatial.
What does this all mean in terms of equations?? is special relativity wrong? whats the metric in flat space then? If we test special relativity, say we watch a clock tick in the rest frame and also measure it against o clock in a moving frame are we not measuring a time dilation?
I don’t know if it’s proven (I think it can’t yet be anyways), but molecules may be constantly blinking in and out of existance. If this is truely the case, then where do they go when they are not here?
Einsteins equivalence states that the speed of light is constant. light can bend therefore its deceleration is not constant. You clearly don’t understand General Relativity.
I know what EP means, I for some reason didn’t finish my thought. Light aquires mass when it interacts with fermions, something Einstein did not know when he devised EP. When this happens it’s force becomes noticeable. Thus showing that light dilates and time is constant.
If time were not constant, the harmony of quantum environment would deteriorate to chaos. The fundamental harmony of this creates the resonances that manifest as bosons and fermions.
time dilation has been measured; how do you explain this? only virtual photons aquire ‘mass’ but this is just a way of calculating the feynman diagram. A real photon involved with the photoelectric effect, ie with electrons in an atom, is massless. In other words light is made up of real photons which travel at a constant speed for all obesrvers hence time dilation.
Quatum field theory relys on relativistic effects such as time not being constant and this is where virtual photons come from so what you say is directly condicting itself.
What equations in relativity need to be altered to allow for this constant time? how does this affect QED? without relative time theres to lorentz invariance how come all tesets of lorentz invariance have been passed?
What unit of measurement was used when defining time dilation?
What tells you that the dilation is not observer illusion?
What regulates and/or measures this dilation?
Time dilation is in units, what creates these units?
I’m asking these questions to clarify what you mean. I can assume your answers and go on but maybe you’ll throw me a curveball…
Defining the ‘clock’ that measures this is crucial.
Erm you can use many units its independent of the units: secounds, eV^-1, lightmeters, kilograms^-1 take your pick.
What tells me its not an illusion? well you don’t need an observer for it to happen…its not schodingers cat…
What regulates and/or measures this dilation?
Any physical thing that can be a clock…
As I said before you could choose from many units but as c and h bar are constant natural units are where c= h bar =1. But time dilation is independent of units as are all physical laws…
To consider the change before defining what is changing is ludicrous.
You must define time, first. Pomo physics cannot do so.
Dilation, as a concept, assumes that something changes in comparison with something else.
This makes dilation a relative term and such a change is impossible to validate without a comparitive constant.
The only constant is the contrived speed of light, which is counterintuitive.
If one assumes that time is a counting of a unit; and that, it is also most logical that said unit that is counted is considered as a constant; then a definition of time can be framed.
Thus we start time as a constant (not dilating). This time then remains confused, but for now an axiom. So I ask what is the ‘clock’ that creates the constant ‘unit’.
When considering concepts such as relative past and future, something must dilate. And this is noticable as speeds increase toward the infinite, or infinitesimal. This dilation is easily accounted for when one realizes that light (delivering feedback) is decreasing in speed at the rate of one ‘unit’ of constant ‘time’ per pulse.
If Einstein kept time instead of light constant, he would not have been confused with the absolute structure necessity of the cosmological constant or the disruptive space-time continuum concept.
So the goal is to define the ‘clock’ that creates the ‘unit’ of time.
Light’s variance creates all diversity; time’s constant unit keeps said diversity from complete chaos.
where ds is invariant in all inertial frames of refernce
t= time
In units c=1
Time is define like that.
For special relativity.
This has been proven experimentally.
For GR the space is curved so the metric tensor is a fuction of spacetime…
atomic clocks have been put in planes to measure time dilation so its a fact…
It is true to say that time is just defined by the motion of objects thus its only define relative to the objects motion…This is relativity. A clock is any system that says in a constant harmonic state.
So if i had a universe with no harmonic states ie no clocks we couldn’t measure time and thus time would be impossible to measure. Like if nothing was in motion relative to other objects there would be no passage of time…understand??? Time is dependent on motion not the other way around…time is not absolute
relativity is simply a statment of logic for physics to be consistant…
Any harmonic system in a rest frame…simple…and as its any harmonic system the period can be of any length thus the unit of time can be any length…an hour a minute 0.367…the unit is defined by the dynamics of the system.
Interestingly this line of thought also verges on an explanition of th uncertainty principle…atleast for time and energy…may have to post my thoughts on this connection.
Motion alone cannot create time. Time requires a unit, that is motion must be interrupted to create time. This motion is accelerating, and an accelerating motion requires an energy source.
The first ‘tick’ is a function of dark energy. Subsequent ‘ticks’ are a function of resonance that are produced by complex oscillations (more on that later).
What is a ‘tick’, and more importantly HOW does it occur?
Perpetualty physics has defined the harmony that creates the resonances that stop/transfer the energy of the pulse for a ‘moment’. This ‘moment’ is the ‘tick’ that is fundamental time.
Everything has a geometry and all of this has been defined. The resonances that transfer energy have been defined.
When the unending quaquaversal motion is ‘just so’, in accordance with the probability of the Feynman Diagrams, there is a harmony that creates a resonance that requires an energy transfer that interrupts, in a cyclic manner, the decelerating expansion.
The slide, swing and vibrations of the opposing motion’s vectors complex oscillations can only form an ellipsoid.
If you study the geometry you would find that an ellipsoid is the only possibility if the opposing vectors from the spherical locus and it’s central point remain constant, which they must, as there is no manifestation that has evolved to change these vectors.
Observation of macro and micro scales indicates that all that exists is fundamentally ellipsoidal.
This eliminates the CP definition of time and the Universe. Geometry doesn’t lie. However, contrived equations can and do.
Equations can say anything. One can define anything by manipulating symbols. Einstein himself had equations for both the expanding Universe and a Perpetual Universe.
No words can say anything, equations have definate meaning and what you write does not. Its just BS…sorry but it is…equations are the language of physics so stop your psuedo science rants droping in CP this, feynman diagram that, dark energy blah blah blah…can u calculate a feynman diagram???..
And your wrong in what you said. a harmonic system(clock) does not need an energy source; energy is conserved…thats about as basic physics as you can get my friend. an accelerating object only needs to exchange its potential energy for kinetic energy…its a pendulum…thats all…im sure most people on here studied a simple pendulum at school…no energy souce is needed.
“The first ‘tick’ is a function of dark energy”…lmfao…yes clocks run on dark energy…
Haha and you just talked about dark energy hahahahaha…oopsy mr “the universe isn’t expanding”…why did physicists introduce dark energy??? oh yes because they thought the universe was expanding at an increased rate…apears you shot yourself in the foot there eh
Hang on… Wouldn’t the 3rd dimension be like in geometry. A bunch of planes(2nd dimension) connected together. That would make the 4th dimention be time, which connects the 3rd dimention together.
not really…thats more like a description of newtonian space and newtonian time as supposed to spacetime…
if you say theres 2d of space and 1d of time you can actually visualise it. so if each plane of 2d(3d planes really) is a single moment in time that would be absolute time the way newton understood it.
instead you don’t split spacetime into planes you just see it as 4d. So a rotaion in the 4d will change what you measure as time and what you measure as space.
just visulaise it as space being up and down and time being left and right then you take a bottle vertically and rotate it, so its on its side, its space dimension (its height in the visualistion) reduces and its time dimension(length in the visualistion) increases…this is just time dilation and length contraction…and you rotate something in spacetime simply by moving it at a speed relative to you.
If it was planes of 3d space you could only rotate in the 3d planes not in the 4d space time…understand?
Erm the dimensions don’t match in those equations…
whats e?
In the first equation your adding a square speed to a square distance to get a square speed…Oh dear…which are invariant s c or v? I’d assume s as thats its defination…so is s an invariant speed??? that would make more sense maybe? not sure…
