Realize that mass attraction and gravity principles were very vague and obscure to everyone not all that long ago.
The specific mention and focus on “Momentum” seems to be the only bit that the historic philosophers (including the founders of the religions) seem to have overlooked. They very lightly touch on the need, but display a lack of serious “scientific” understanding on the issue. It is a critical element. I can substantially prove that the concept undeniably belongs there, but most people are still arguing over other tidbits of their faith. No one really knows who to listen to so people make very little progress.
I do my own deducing and originating based as strictly as I can in the logical necessity within Logical Metaphysics. I am a genuine philosopher originating concepts from current concerns and perspectives. I very seldom, almost never, quote some other philosopher’s work. Although I can see from where many historic concepts originated, I don’t accept anything until I can see the validity of the concepts. But I am very aware of how distorted rhetoric has become concerning ancient thoughts, so I hold off judgment until I can see clearly exactly what must be true. I am a judge of “angels”/ideas, not people (“clarify, verify, and remember…”).
You shouldn’t be surprised with that nor with the idea that your notion of God, despite being similar to the most common in the West, is not really what the Middle Eastern originators thought either.
The word “God” is not my word. I didn’t invent the word nor any proposed concept behind it. As I studied, I found a great deal of confusion surrounding the word, intentional confusion. I cut through the clouds, in my usual manner, so as to get to the point. I discovered that many have intentionally obfuscated the entire issue surrounding the word “God” leaving many concepts available. Some of the concepts are valid depending entirely on perspective. So I don’t really use the word much myself unless someone else has.
I invented the word/name “Mygod” so as to emphasize the concept that anyone’s real situation is more of a God to them than anything else could be and is always a little unique to the person. To pray to Mygod means to examine, investigate, inquire of your personal situation when seeking answers (“clarify, verify, and remember…”)
My understanding of the intentions of the ancients comes largely through their words, not the translations that other people have made of them. Even in the Days of Moses, some concepts were already skewed from the days of Ahdam. I can know such things through proper attention and study (so could anyone else staying altruistic in their investigation). In addition to their actual words, logical consistency leads the way and eventually verifies the path.
- consistency
- completeness
- relevance
Those “angels” lead to the truth of what ancient people meant by what they wrote. That doesn’t mean that what they wrote was true or not. But until you really have studied enough to know without much question of exactly what they really meant, arguing that they were right or wrong is a bit immature.
As to your topic question;
You asked an open, “what’s your thought on this subject” type of question, so I answered. I’m not preaching, just explaining my perspective. Boyan was referring to one of the more valid concepts of God, but certainly not the only one. My advised answer includes his concept and probably all other valid concepts as well. But that is something you would have to study very carefully to verify.
The answer appears a bit vague and lengthy because it is new. It is a “whole” concept (“holy”) concerning the make of God. It includes all Secular principles as well as those of ancient religions. It, to my knowledge, is the “real deal”, vague to you currently or not.
Most ordinary people lack the education to even ask of God at all in that they have no real understanding of what they are asking so any answer tends to be misleading. And it has been that way for thousands of years. A great deal of misinformation has been generated (and is still being generated for political reasons).